1.1.4.RELEASE
Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 VMware, Inc. All rights reserved. VMware is a registered trademark or trademark of VMware, Inc. in the United States and/or other jurisdictions. All other marks and names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective companies.
Table of Contents
The Spring AMQP project applies core Spring concepts to the development of AMQP-based messaging solutions. We provide a "template" as a high-level abstraction for sending and receiving messages. We also provide support for Message-driven POJOs. These libraries facilitate management of AMQP resources while promoting the use of dependency injection and declarative configuration. In all of these cases, you will see similarities to the JMS support in the Spring Framework. The project consists of both Java and .NET versions. This manual is dedicated to the Java version. For links to the .NET version's manual or any other project-related information visit the Spring AMQP project homepage.
This first part of the reference documentation is a high-level overview of Spring AMQP and the underlying concepts and some code snippets that will get you up and running as quickly as possible.
This is the 5 minute tour to get started with Spring AMQP.
Prerequisites: install and run the RabbitMQ broker (http://www.rabbitmq.com/download.html). Then grab the spring-rabbit JAR and all its dependencies - the easiest way to do that is to declare a dependency in your build tool, e.g. for Maven:
<dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.amqp</groupId> <artifactId>spring-rabbit</artifactId> <version>1.1.4.RELEASE</version> </dependency>
Using plain, imperative Java to send and receive a message:
ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory(); AmqpAdmin admin = new RabbitAdmin(connectionFactory); admin.declareQueue(new Queue("myqueue")); AmqpTemplate template = new RabbitTemplate(connectionFactory); template.convertAndSend("myqueue", "foo"); String foo = (String) template.receiveAndConvert("myqueue");
Note that there is a ConnectionFactory
in
the native Java Rabbit client as well. We are using the Spring
abstraction in the code above. We are relying on the default exchange in
the broker (since none is specified in the send), and the default
binding of all queues to the default exchange by their name (hence we
can use the queue name as a routing key in the send). Those behaviours
are defined in the AMQP specification.
The same example as above, but externalizing the resource configuration to XML:
ApplicationContext context = new GenericXmlApplicationContext("classpath:/rabbit-context.xml"); AmqpTemplate template = context.getBean(AmqpTemplate.class); template.convertAndSend("myqueue", "foo"); String foo = (String) template.receiveAndConvert("myqueue");
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:rabbit="http://www.springframework.org/schema/rabbit" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/rabbit http://www.springframework.org/schema/rabbit/spring-rabbit-1.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <rabbit:connection-factory id="connectionFactory"/> <rabbit:template id="amqpTemplate" connection-factory="connectionFactory"/> <rabbit:admin connection-factory="connectionFactory"/> <rabbit:queue name="myqueue"/> </beans>
The <rabbit:admin/>
declaration by default
automatically looks for beans of type Queue
,
Exchange
and Binding
and
declares them to the broker on behalf of the user, hence there is no
need to use that bean explicitly in the simple Java driver. There are
plenty of options to configure the properties of the components in the
XML schema - you can use auto-complete features of your XML editor to
explore them and look at their documentation.
The same example again with the external configuration in Java:
ApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(RabbitConfiguration.class); AmqpTemplate template = context.getBean(AmqpTemplate.class); template.convertAndSend("myqueue", "foo"); String foo = (String) template.receiveAndConvert("myqueue");
@Configuration public class RabbitConfiguration { @Bean public ConnectionFactory connectionFactory() { CachingConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory("localhost"); return connectionFactory; } @Bean public AmqpAdmin amqpAdmin() { return new RabbitAdmin(connectionFactory()); } @Bean public RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate() { return new RabbitTemplate(connectionFactory()); } @Bean public Queue myQueue() { return new Queue("myqueue"); } }
This part of the reference documentation details the various components that comprise Spring AMQP. The main chapter covers the core classes to develop an AMQP application. This part also includes a chapter on integration with Erlang and a chapter about the sample applications.
In this chapter, we will explore the interfaces and classes that are the essential components for developing applications with Spring AMQP.
Spring AMQP consists of a handful of modules, each represented by a
JAR in the distribution. These modules are: spring-amqp, spring-rabbit and
spring-erlang. The 'spring-amqp' module contains the
org.springframework.amqp.core
package. Within that
package, you will find the classes that represent the core AMQP "model".
Our intention is to provide generic abstractions that do not rely on any
particular AMQP broker implementation or client library. End user code
will be more portable across vendor implementations as it can be developed
against the abstraction layer only. These abstractions are then used
implemented by broker-specific modules, such as 'spring-rabbit'. For the
1.0 release there is only a RabbitMQ implementation however the
abstractions have been validated in .NET using Apache Qpid in addition to
RabbitMQ. Since AMQP operates at the protocol level in principle the
RabbitMQ client can be used with any broker that supports the same
protocol version, but we do not test any other brokers at present.
The overview here assumes that you are already familiar with the basics of the AMQP specification already. If you are not, then have a look at the resources listed in Part IV, “Other Resources”
The 0-8 and 0-9-1 AMQP specifications do not define a Message
class or interface. Instead, when performing an operation such as
'
', the content is passed as a byte-array argument and
additional properties are passed in as separate arguments. Spring AMQP
defines a Message class as part of a more general AMQP domain model
representation. The purpose of the Message class is to simply
encapsulate the body and properties within a single instance so that the
API can in turn be simpler. The Message class definition is quite
straightforward.basicPublish
public class Message { private final MessageProperties messageProperties; private final byte[] body; public Message(byte[] body, MessageProperties messageProperties) { this.body = body; this.messageProperties = messageProperties; } public byte[] getBody() { return this.body; } public MessageProperties getMessageProperties() { return this.messageProperties; }
The MessageProperties
interface
defines several common properties such as 'messageId', 'timestamp',
'contentType', and several more. Those properties can also be extended
with user-defined 'headers' by calling the setHeader(String
key, Object value)
method.
The Exchange
interface represents
an AMQP Exchange, which is what a Message Producer sends to. Each
Exchange within a virtual host of a broker will have a unique name as
well as a few other properties:
public interface Exchange { String getName(); String getExchangeType(); boolean isDurable(); boolean isAutoDelete(); Map<String, Object> getArguments(); }
As you can see, an Exchange also has a 'type' represented by constants
defined in ExchangeTypes
. The basic types are:
Direct
, Topic
,
Fanout
, Headers
and
Federated
. In the core package you will find
implementations of the Exchange
interface
for each of those types. The behavior varies across these Exchange types
in terms of how they handle bindings to Queues. For example, a Direct exchange allows
for a Queue to be bound by a fixed routing key (often the Queue's name).
A Topic exchange supports bindings with routing patterns that may
include the '*' and '#' wildcards for 'exactly-one' and 'zero-or-more',
respectively. The Fanout exchange publishes to all Queues that are bound
to it without taking any routing key into consideration. For much more
information about these and the other Exchange types, check out Part IV, “Other Resources”.
![]() | Note |
---|---|
The AMQP specification also requires that any broker provide a "default" Direct Exchange that has no name. All Queues that are declared will be bound to that default Exchange with their names as routing keys. You will learn more about the default Exchange's usage within Spring AMQP in Section 2.3, “AmqpTemplate”. |
The Queue
class represents the component
from which a Message Consumer receives Messages. Like the various
Exchange classes, our implementation is intended to be an abstract
representation of this core AMQP type.
public class Queue { private final String name; private volatile boolean durable; private volatile boolean exclusive; private volatile boolean autoDelete; private volatile Map<String, Object> arguments; /** * The queue is durable, non-exclusive and non auto-delete. * * @param name the name of the queue. */ public Queue(String name) { this(name, true, false, false); } // Getters and Setters omitted for brevity
Notice that the constructor takes the Queue name. Depending on the implementation, the admin template may provide methods for generating a uniquely named Queue. Such Queues can be useful as a "reply-to" address or other temporary situations. For that reason, the 'exclusive' and 'autoDelete' properties of an auto-generated Queue would both be set to 'true'.
![]() | Note |
---|---|
See the section on queues in Section 2.8, “Configuring the broker” for information about declaring queues using namespace support, including queue arguments. |
Given that a producer sends to an Exchange and a consumer receives
from a Queue, the bindings that connect Queues to Exchanges are critical
for connecting those producers and consumers via messaging. In Spring
AMQP, we define a Binding
class to represent
those connections. Let's review the basic options for binding Queues to
Exchanges.
You can bind a Queue to a DirectExchange with a fixed routing key.
new Binding(someQueue, someDirectExchange, "foo.bar")
You can bind a Queue to a TopicExchange with a routing pattern.
new Binding(someQueue, someTopicExchange, "foo.*")
You can bind a Queue to a FanoutExchange with no routing key.
new Binding(someQueue, someFanoutExchange)
We also provide a BindingBuilder
to
facilitate a "fluent API" style.
Binding b = BindingBuilder.bind(someQueue).to(someTopicExchange).with("foo.*");
![]() | Note |
---|---|
The BindingBuilder class is shown above for clarity, but this style works well when using a static import for the 'bind()' method. |
By itself, an instance of the Binding class is just holding the
data about a connection. In other words, it is not an "active"
component. However, as you will see later in Section 2.8, “Configuring the broker”, Binding instances can be used by the
AmqpAdmin
class to actually trigger the
binding actions on the broker. Also, as you will see in that same
section, the Binding instances can be defined using Spring's
@Bean
-style within @Configuration
classes. There is also a convenient base class which further simplifies
that approach for generating AMQP-related bean definitions and
recognizes the Queues, Exchanges, and Bindings so that they will all be
declared on the AMQP broker upon application startup.
The AmqpTemplate
is also defined
within the core package. As one of the main components involved in actual
AMQP messaging, it is discussed in detail in its own section (see Section 2.3, “AmqpTemplate”).
Whereas the AMQP model we described in the previous section is generic and applicable to all implementations, when we get into the management of resources, the details are specific to the broker implementation. Therefore, in this section, we will be focusing on code that exists only within our "spring-rabbit" module since at this point, RabbitMQ is the only supported implementation.
The central component for managing a connection to the
RabbitMQ broker is the
ConnectionFactory
interface. The
responsibility of a
ConnectionFactory
implementation is
to provide an instance of
org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.connection.Connection
which is a wrapper for
com.rabbitmq.client.Connection
. The
only concrete implementation we provide is
CachingConnectionFactory
which establishes a
single connection proxy that can be shared by the application. Sharing
of the connection is possible since the "unit of work" for
messaging with AMQP is actually a "channel" (in some ways, this is
similar to the relationship between a Connection and a Session in
JMS). As you can imagine, the connection instance provides a
createChannel
method. The
CachingConnectionFactory
implementation
supports caching of those channels, and it maintains separate
caches for channels based on whether they are transactional or not.
When creating an instance of CachingConnectionFactory
,
the 'hostname' can be provided via the constructor. The 'username' and
'password' properties should be provided as well. If you would like to
configure the size of the channel cache (the default is 1), you could
call the setChannelCacheSize()
method here as well.
CachingConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory("somehost"); connectionFactory.setUsername("guest"); connectionFactory.setPassword("guest"); Connection connection = connectionFactory.createConnection();
When using XML, the configuration might look like this:
<bean id="connectionFactory" class="org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.connection.CachingConnectionFactory"> <constructor-arg value="somehost"/> <property name="username" value="guest"/> <property name="password" value="guest"/> </bean>
![]() | Note |
---|---|
There is also a SingleConnectionFactory
implementation which is only available in the unit test code of the framework.
It is simpler than CachingConnectionFactory since it does
not cache channels, but it is not intended for practical usage
outside of simple tests due to its lack of performance and resilience.
If you find a need to implement your own ConnectionFactory
for some reason, the AbstractConnectionFactory
base class may provide a nice starting point. |
A ConnectionFactory
can
be created quickly and conveniently using the rabbit namespace:
<rabbit:connection-factory id="connectionFactory"/>
In most cases this
will be preferable since the framework can choose the best
defaults for you. The created instance will be a
CachingConnectionFactory
.
Keep in mind that the default cache size for channels is 1.
If you want more channels to be cached set a larger value via the
'channelCacheSize' property. In XML it would look like this:
<bean id="connectionFactory" class="org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.connection.CachingConnectionFactory"> <constructor-arg value="somehost"/> <property name="username" value="guest"/> <property name="password" value="guest"/> <property name="channelCacheSize" value="25"/> </bean>
And with the namespace you can just add the 'channel-cache-size' attribute:
<rabbit:connection-factory id="connectionFactory" channel-cache-size="25"/>
Host and port attributes can be provided using the namespace
<rabbit:connection-factory id="connectionFactory" host="somehost" port="5672" />
Alternatively, if running in a clustered environment, use the addresses attribute.
<rabbit:connection-factory id="connectionFactory" addresses="host1:5672,host2:5672" />
Confirmed and returned messages are supported by setting the
CachingConnectionFactory
's publisherConfirms
and publisherReturns
properties to 'true' respectively.
Channel
s created by
the factory are wrapped in an PublisherCallbackChannel
which is used to facilitate the callbacks. When such a channel is obtained, the
client can register a PublisherCallbackChannel.Listener
with the Channel
. The
PublisherCallbackChannel
implementation contains logic
to route a confirm/return to the appropriate listener.
These features are explained further in the following sections.
![]() | Tip |
---|---|
For some more background information, please see the following blog post by the RabbitMQ team titled Introducing Publisher Confirms. |
As with many other high-level abstractions provided by the Spring
Framework and related projects, Spring AMQP provides a "template" that
plays a central role. The interface that defines the main operations is
called AmqpTemplate
. Those operations cover
the general behavior for sending and receiving Messages. In other words,
they are not unique to any implementation, hence the "AMQP" in the name.
On the other hand, there are implementations of that interface that are
tied to implementations of the AMQP protocol. Unlike JMS, which is an
interface-level API itself, AMQP is a wire-level protocol. The
implementations of that protocol provide their own client libraries, so
each implementation of the template interface will depend on a particular
client library. Currently, there is only a single implementation:
RabbitTemplate
. In the examples that follow, you
will often see usage of an "AmqpTemplate", but when you look at the
configuration examples, or any code excerpts where the template is
instantiated and/or setters are invoked, you will see the implementation
type (e.g. "RabbitTemplate").
As mentioned above, the AmqpTemplate
interface defines all of the basic operations for sending and receiving
Messages. We will explore Message sending and reception, respectively, in
the two sections that follow.
The RabbitTemplate
implementation of AmqpTemplate
supports Publisher Confirms and Returns.
For returned messages, the template's
mandatory
property must be set to 'true', and it requires
a CachingConnectionFactory
that has its
publisherReturns
property set to true. Returns are sent to
to the client by it registering a RabbitTemplate.ReturnCallback
by calling setReturnCallback(ReturnCallback callback)
. The callback
must implement this method:
void returnedMessage(Message message, int replyCode, String replyText, String exchange, String routingKey);
Only one ReturnCallback
is supported by each
RabbitTemplate
.
For Publisher Confirms (aka Publisher Acknowledgements), the template requires
a CachingConnectionFactory
that has its
publisherConfirms
property set to true. Confirms are sent to
to the client by it registering a RabbitTemplate.ConfirmCallback
by calling setConfirmCallback(ConfirmCallback callback)
. The callback
must implement this method:
void confirm(CorrelationData correlationData, boolean ack);
The CorrelationData
is an object supplied by the client when sending the
original message. This is described further in the next section.
Only one ConfirmCallback
is supported by a
RabbitTemplate
.
When sending a Message, one can use any of the following methods:
void send(Message message) throws AmqpException; void send(String routingKey, Message message) throws AmqpException; void send(String exchange, String routingKey, Message message) throws AmqpException;
We can begin our discussion with the last method listed above since it is actually the most explicit. It allows an AMQP Exchange name to be provided at runtime along with a routing key. The last parameter is the callback that is responsible for actual creating of the Message instance. An example of using this method to send a Message might look this this:
amqpTemplate.send("marketData.topic", "quotes.nasdaq.FOO", new Message("12.34".getBytes(), someProperties));
The "exchange" property can be set on the template itself if you plan to use that template instance to send to the same exchange most or all of the time. In such cases, the second method listed above may be used instead. The following example is functionally equivalent to the previous one:
amqpTemplate.setExchange("marketData.topic"); amqpTemplate.send("quotes.nasdaq.FOO", new Message("12.34".getBytes(), someProperties));
If both the "exchange" and "routingKey" properties are set on the
template, then the method accepting only the
Message
may be used:
amqpTemplate.setExchange("marketData.topic"); amqpTemplate.setRoutingKey("quotes.nasdaq.FOO"); amqpTemplate.send(new Message("12.34".getBytes(), someProperties));
A better way of thinking about the exchange and routing key properties is that the explicit method parameters will always override the template's default values. In fact, even if you do not explicitly set those properties on the template, there are always default values in place. In both cases, the default is an empty String, but that is actually a sensible default. As far as the routing key is concerned, it's not always necessary in the first place (e.g. a Fanout Exchange). Furthermore, a Queue may be bound to an Exchange with an empty String. Those are both legitimate scenarios for reliance on the default empty String value for the routing key property of the template. As far as the Exchange name is concerned, the empty String is quite commonly used because the AMQP specification defines the "default Exchange" as having no name. Since all Queues are automatically bound to that default Exchange (which is a Direct Exchange) using their name as the binding value, that second method above can be used for simple point-to-point Messaging to any Queue through the default Exchange. Simply provide the queue name as the "routingKey" - either by providing the method parameter at runtime:
RabbitTemplate template = new RabbitTemplate(); // using default no-name Exchange template.send("queue.helloWorld", new Message("Hello World".getBytes(), someProperties));
Or, if you prefer to create a template that will be used for publishing primarily or exclusively to a single Queue, the following is perfectly reasonable:
RabbitTemplate template = new RabbitTemplate(); // using default no-name Exchange template.setRoutingKey("queue.helloWorld"); // but we'll always send to this Queue template.send(new Message("Hello World".getBytes(), someProperties));
With the RabbitTemplate
implementation of AmqpTemplate
,
each of the send()
methods has an overloaded version that takes an
additional CorrelationData
object. When publisher confirms
are enabled, this object is returned in the callback described in
Section 2.3, “AmqpTemplate”. This allows the sender to correlate
a confirm (ack or nack) with the sent message.
When the template's mandatory
property is 'true' returned messages are provided
by the callback described in Section 2.3, “AmqpTemplate”.
Message reception is always a bit more complicated than sending. The
reason is that there are two ways to receive a
Message
. The simpler option is to poll for a single
Message
at a time with a synchronous, blocking
method call. The more complicated yet more common approach is to register
a listener that will receive Messages
on-demand,
asynchronously. We will look at an example of each approach in the next
two sub-sections.
The AmqpTemplate
itself can be used
for synchronous Message reception. There are two 'receive' methods
available. As with the Exchange on the sending side, there is a method
that requires a queue property having been set directly on the template
itself, and there is a method that accepts a queue parameter at
runtime.
Message receive() throws AmqpException; Message receive(String queueName) throws AmqpException;
Just like in the case of sending messages, the
AmqpTemplate
has some convenience methods for
receiving POJOs instead of Message
instances, and
implementations will provide a way to customize the
MessageConverter
used to create the
Object
returned:
Object receiveAndConvert() throws AmqpException; Object receiveAndConvert(String queueName) throws AmqpException;
For asynchronous Message
reception, a dedicated component (not the
AmqpTemplate
) is involved. That component
is a container for a Message consuming callback. We will look at the
container and its properties in just a moment, but first we should look at
the callback since that is where your application code will be integrated
with the messaging system. There are a few options for the callback. The
simplest of these is to implement the
MessageListener
interface:
public interface MessageListener { void onMessage(Message message); }
If your callback logic depends upon the AMQP
Channel instance for any reason, you may instead use the
ChannelAwareMessageListener
. It looks
similar but with an extra parameter:
public interface ChannelAwareMessageListener { void onMessage(Message message, Channel channel) throws Exception; }
If you prefer to maintain a stricter separation between your application logic and the messaging API, you can rely upon an adapter implementation that is provided by the framework. This is often referred to as "Message-driven POJO" support. When using the adapter, you only need to provide a reference to the instance that the adapter itself should invoke.
MessageListener listener = new MessageListenerAdapter(somePojo);
Now
that you've seen the various options for the Message-listening callback,
we can turn our attention to the container. Basically, the container
handles the "active" responsibilities so that the listener callback can
remain passive. The container is an example of a "lifecycle" component. It
provides methods for starting and stopping. When configuring the
container, you are essentially bridging the gap between an AMQP Queue and
the MessageListener
instance. You must
provide a reference to the
ConnectionFactory
and the queue name or
Queue instance(s) from which that listener should consume Messages. Here
is the most basic example using the default implementation,
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
: SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(); container.setConnectionFactory(rabbitConnectionFactory); container.setQueueNames("some.queue"); container.setMessageListener(new MessageListenerAdapter(somePojo));As an "active" component, it's most common to create the listener container with a bean definition so that it can simply run in the background. This can be done via XML:
<rabbit:listener-container connection-factory="rabbitConnectionFactory"> <rabbit:listener queues="some.queue" ref="somePojo" method="handle"/> </rabbit:listener-container>Or, you may prefer to use the @Configuration style which will look very similar to the actual code snippet above:
@Configuration public class ExampleAmqpConfiguration { @Bean public MessageListenerContainer messageListenerContainer() { SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(); container.setConnectionFactory(rabbitConnectionFactory()); container.setQueueName("some.queue"); container.setMessageListener(exampleListener()); return container; } @Bean public ConnectionFactory rabbitConnectionFactory() { CachingConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory("localhost"); connectionFactory.setUsername("guest"); connectionFactory.setPassword("guest"); return connectionFactory; } @Bean public MessageListener exampleListener() { return new MessageListener() { public void onMessage(Message message) { System.out.println("received: " + message); } }; } }
The AmqpTemplate
also defines several
methods for sending and receiving Messages that will delegate to a
MessageConverter
. The
MessageConverter
itself is quite
straightforward. It provides a single method for each direction: one for
converting to a Message and another for converting
from a Message. Notice that when converting to a
Message, you may also provide properties in addition to the object. The
"object" parameter typically corresponds to the Message body.
public interface MessageConverter { Message toMessage(Object object, MessageProperties messageProperties) throws MessageConversionException; Object fromMessage(Message message) throws MessageConversionException; }
The relevant Message-sending methods on the
AmqpTemplate
are listed below. They
are simpler than the methods we discussed previously because they
do not require the Message
instance.
Instead, the MessageConverter
is
responsible for "creating" each Message
by
converting the provided object to the byte array for
the Message
body and then adding any
provided MessageProperties
.
void convertAndSend(Object message) throws AmqpException; void convertAndSend(String routingKey, Object message) throws AmqpException; void convertAndSend(String exchange, String routingKey, Object message) throws AmqpException; void convertAndSend(Object message, MessagePostProcessor messagePostProcessor) throws AmqpException; void convertAndSend(String routingKey, Object message, MessagePostProcessor messagePostProcessor) throws AmqpException; void convertAndSend(String exchange, String routingKey, Object message, MessagePostProcessor messagePostProcessor) throws AmqpException;
On the receiving side, there are only two methods: one that accepts the queue name and one that relies on the template's "queue" property having been set.
Object receiveAndConvert() throws AmqpException; Object receiveAndConvert(String queueName) throws AmqpException;
The default implementation of the
MessageConverter
strategy is called
SimpleMessageConverter
. This is the converter
that will be used by an instance of RabbitTemplate if you do not
explicitly configure an alternative. It handles text-based content,
serialized Java objects, and simple byte arrays.
If the content type of the input Message begins with "text"
(e.g. "text/plain"), it will also check for the content-encoding
property to determine the charset to be used when converting the
Message body byte array to a Java String. If no content-encoding
property had been set on the input Message, it will use the "UTF-8"
charset by default. If you need to override that default setting, you
can configure an instance of
SimpleMessageConverter
, set its
"defaultCharset" property and then inject that into a
RabbitTemplate
instance.
If the content-type property value of the input Message is set
to "application/x-java-serialized-object", the
SimpleMessageConverter
will attempt to
deserialize (rehydrate) the byte array into a Java object. While that
might be useful for simple prototyping, it's generally not recommended
to rely on Java serialization since it leads to tight coupling between
the producer and consumer. Of course, it also rules out usage of
non-Java systems on either side. With AMQP being a wire-level
protocol, it would be unfortunate to lose much of that advantage with
such restrictions. In the next two sections, we'll explore some
alternatives for passing rich domain object content without relying on
Java serialization.
For all other content-types, the
SimpleMessageConverter
will return the Message
body content directly as a byte array.
When converting to a Message from an arbitrary Java Object, the
SimpleMessageConverter
likewise deals with byte
arrays, Strings, and Serializable instances. It will convert each of
these to bytes (in the case of byte arrays, there is nothing to
convert), and it will set the content-type property accordingly. If
the Object to be converted does not match one of those types, the
Message body will be null.
As mentioned in the previous section, relying on Java
serialization is generally not recommended. One rather common
alternative that is more flexible and portable across different
languages and platforms is JSON (JavaScript Object Notation). An
implementation is available and can be configured on any
RabbitTemplate
instance to override its usage of
the SimpleMessageConverter
default.
<bean class="org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.core.RabbitTemplate"> <property name="connectionFactory" ref="rabbitConnectionFactory"/> <property name="messageConverter"> <bean class="org.springframework.amqp.support.converter.JsonMessageConverter"> <!-- if necessary, override the DefaultClassMapper --> <property name="classMapper" ref="customClassMapper"/> </bean> </property> </bean>
As shown above, the JsonMessageConverter
uses a
DefaultClassMapper
by default. Type information is
added to (and retrieved from) the MessageProperties
.
If an inbound message does not contain type information in the
MessageProperties
, but you know the expected type,
you can configure a static type using the defaultType
property
<bean id="jsonConverterWithDefaultType" class="org.springframework.amqp.support.converter.JsonMessageConverter"> <property name="classMapper"> <bean class="org.springframework.amqp.support.converter.DefaultClassMapper"> <property name="defaultType" value="foo.PurchaseOrder" /> </bean> </property> </bean>
Yet another option is the
MarshallingMessageConverter
. It delegates to the
Spring OXM library's implementations of the
Marshaller
and
Unmarshaller
strategy interfaces. You can
read more about that library here.
In terms of configuration, it's most common to provide the constructor
argument only since most implementations of
Marshaller
will also implement
Unmarshaller
.
<bean class="org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.core.RabbitTemplate"> <property name="connectionFactory" ref="rabbitConnectionFactory"/> <property name="messageConverter"> <bean class="org.springframework.amqp.support.converter.MarshallingMessageConverter"> <constructor-arg ref="someImplemenationOfMarshallerAndUnmarshaller"/> </bean> </property> </bean>
The AmqpTemplate
also provides a variety of
sendAndReceive
methods that accept the same argument options
that you have seen above for the one-way send operations (exchange, routingKey, and Message).
Those methods are quite useful for request/reply scenarios since they handle the configuration
of the necessary "reply-to" property before sending and can listen for the reply message on an
exclusive Queue that is created internally for that purpose.
Similar request/reply methods are also available where the MessageConverter
is applied to both the request and reply. Those methods are named convertSendAndReceive
.
See the Javadoc of AmqpTemplate
for more detail.
By default, a new temporary queue is used for each reply. However, a single reply queue can be configured on the template, which allows you to set arguments on that queue (such as 'ha_args="all"' for mirrored queues). In this case, however, you must also provide a <reply-listener/> sub element. This element provides a listener container for the reply queue, with the template being the listener. All of the Section 2.11, “Message Listener Container Configuration” attributes allowed on a <listener-container/> are allowed on the element, except for connection-factory and message-converter, which are inherited from the template's configuration.
<rabbit:template id="amqpTemplate" connection-factory="connectionFactory" reply-queue="replies"> <rabbit:reply-listener /> </rabbit:template>
While the container and template share a connection factory, they do not share a channel and therefore requests and replies are not performed within the same transaction (if transactional).
The AMQP specification describes how the protocol can be used to configure Queues, Exchanges and Bindings on the broker. These operations which are portable from the 0.8 specification and higher are present in the AmqpAdmin interface in the org.springframework.amqp.core package. The RabbitMQ implementation of that class is RabbitAdmin located in the org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.core package.
The AmqpAdmin interface is based on using the Spring AMQP domain abstractions and is shown below:
public interface AmqpAdmin { // Exchange Operations void declareExchange(Exchange exchange); void deleteExchange(String exchangeName); // Queue Operations Queue declareQueue(); void declareQueue(Queue queue); void deleteQueue(String queueName); void deleteQueue(String queueName, boolean unused, boolean empty); void purgeQueue(String queueName, boolean noWait); // Binding Operations void declareBinding(Binding binding); }
The no-arg declareQueue() method defines a queue on the broker whose name is automatically generated. The additional properties of this auto-generated queue are exclusive=true, autoDelete=true, and durable=false.
![]() | Note |
---|---|
Removing a binding was not introduced until the 0.9 version of the AMQP spec. |
The RabbitMQ implementation of this interface is RabbitAdmin which when configured using Spring XML would look like this:
<rabbit:connection-factory id="connectionFactory"/> <rabbit:admin id="amqpAdmin" connection-factory="connectionFactory"/>
The RabbitAdmin
implementation does automatic
lazy declaration of Queues
,
Exchanges
and Bindings
declared in the same ApplicationContext
. These
components will be declared as son as a Connection
is opened to the broker. There are some namespace features that make this
very convenient, e.g. in the Stocks sample application we have:
<rabbit:queue id="tradeQueue" /> <rabbit:queue id="marketDataQueue" /> <fanout-exchange name="broadcast.responses" xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/rabbit"> <bindings> <binding queue="tradeQueue" /> </bindings> </fanout-exchange> <topic-exchange name="app.stock.marketdata" xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/rabbit"> <bindings> <binding queue="marketDataQueue" pattern="${stocks.quote.pattern}" /> </bindings> </topic-exchange>
In the example above we are using anonymous Queues (actually internally just Queues with names generated by the framework, not by the broker) and refer to them by ID. We can also declare Queues with explicit names, which also serve as identifiers for their bean definitions in the context. E.g.
<rabbit:queue name="stocks.trade.queue"/>
![]() | Tip |
---|---|
You can provide both an id and a name attribute. This allows you to refer to the queue (for example in a binding) by an id that is independent of the queue name. It also allows standard Spring features such as property placeholders, and SpEL expressions for the queue name; these features are not available when using the name as the bean identifier. |
Queues can be configured with additional arguments, for example, 'x-message-ttl' or 'x-ha-policy'. Using the namespace support, they are provided in the form of a Map of argument name/argument value pairs, using the <rabbit:queue-arguments> element.
<rabbit:queue name="withArguments"> <rabbit:queue-arguments> <entry key="x-ha-policy" value="all" /> </rabbit:queue-arguments> </rabbit:queue>
By default, the arguments are assumed to be strings. For arguments of other types, the type needs to be provided.
<rabbit:queue name="withArguments"> <rabbit:queue-arguments value-type="java.lang.Long"> <entry key="x-message-ttl" value="100" /> </rabbit:queue-arguments> </rabbit:queue>
When providing arguments of mixed types, the type is provided for each entry element:
<rabbit:queue name="withArguments"> <rabbit:queue-arguments> <entry key="x-message-ttl"> <value type="java.lang.Long">100</value> </entry> <entry key="x-ha-policy" value="all" /> </rabbit:queue-arguments> </rabbit:queue>
With Spring Framework 3.2 and later, this can be declared a little more succinctly:
<rabbit:queue name="withArguments"> <rabbit:queue-arguments> <entry key="x-message-ttl" value="100" value-type="java.lang.Long" /> <entry key="x-ha-policy" value="all" /> </rabbit:queue-arguments> </rabbit:queue>
To see how to use Java to configure the AMQP infrastructure, look at
the Stock sample application, where there is the @Configuration
class AbstractStockRabbitConfiguration
which in
turn has RabbitClientConfiguration and RabbitServerConfiguration
subclasses. The code for AbstractStockRabbitConfiguration is shown
below
@Configuration public abstract class AbstractStockAppRabbitConfiguration { @Bean public ConnectionFactory connectionFactory() { CachingConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory("localhost"); connectionFactory.setUsername("guest"); connectionFactory.setPassword("guest"); return connectionFactory; } @Bean public RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate() { RabbitTemplate template = new RabbitTemplate(connectionFactory()); template.setMessageConverter(jsonMessageConverter()); configureRabbitTemplate(template); return template; } @Bean public MessageConverter jsonMessageConverter() { return new JsonMessageConverter(); } @Bean public TopicExchange marketDataExchange() { return new TopicExchange("app.stock.marketdata"); } // additional code omitted for brevity }
In the Stock application, the server is configured using the following @Configuration class:
@Configuration public class RabbitServerConfiguration extends AbstractStockAppRabbitConfiguration { @Bean public Queue stockRequestQueue() { return new Queue("app.stock.request"); } }
This is the end of the whole inheritance chain of @Configuration classes. The end result is the the TopicExchange and Queue will be declared to the broker upon application startup. There is no binding of the TopicExchange to a queue in the server configuration, as that is done in the client application. The stock request queue however is automatically bound to the AMQP default exchange - this behavior is defined by the specification.
The client @Configuration class is a little more interesting and is shown below.
@Configuration public class RabbitClientConfiguration extends AbstractStockAppRabbitConfiguration { @Value("${stocks.quote.pattern}") private String marketDataRoutingKey; @Bean public Queue marketDataQueue() { return amqpAdmin().declareQueue(); } /** * Binds to the market data exchange. Interested in any stock quotes * that match its routing key. */ @Bean public Binding marketDataBinding() { return BindingBuilder.bind( marketDataQueue()).to(marketDataExchange()).with(marketDataRoutingKey); } // additional code omitted for brevity }
The client is declaring another queue via the declareQueue() method on the AmqpAdmin, and it binds that queue to the market data exchange with a routing pattern that is externalized in a properties file.
Rabbit supports federation; federated exchanges are backed by one of the other exchange types. Therefore, when configuring a federated exchange, it is important to supply bindings of the appropriate type for the backing exchange. Examples include...
<federated-exchange name="fedDirect" backing-type="direct" upstream-set="upstream-set"> <direct-bindings> <binding queue="bucket" /> </direct-bindings> </federated-exchange> <federated-exchange name="fedTopic" backing-type="topic" upstream-set="upstream-set"> <topic-bindings> <binding queue="bucket" pattern="bucket.#"/> </topic-bindings> </federated-exchange>
Notice that the child element, e.g. <direct-bindings/> matches the backing-type attribute.
Many operations with the RabbitMQ Java client can throw checked Exceptions. For example, there are a lot of cases where IOExceptions may be thrown. The RabbitTemplate, SimpleMessageListenerContainer, and other Spring AMQP components will catch those Exceptions and convert into one of the Exceptions within our runtime hierarchy. Those are defined in the 'org.springframework.amqp' package, and AmqpException is the base of the hierarchy.
If you are using a
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
you will also be
able to inject a Spring ErrorHandler
instance that
can be used to react to an exception in the listener. The
ErrorHandler
cannot prevent the exception from
eventually propagating, but it can be used to log or alert another
component that there is a problem.
The Spring Rabbit framework has support for automatic transaction management in the synchronous and asynchronous use cases with a number of different semantics that can be selected declaratively, as is familiar to existing users of Spring transactions. This makes many if not most common messaging patterns very easy to implement.
There are two ways to signal the desired transaction semantics to
the framework. In both the RabbitTemplate
and
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
there is a flag
channelTransacted
which, if true, tells the framework to use
a transactional channel and to end all operations (send or receive) with a
commit or rollback depending on the outcome, with an exception signaling
a rollback. Another signal is to provide an external transaction with one
of Spring's PlatformTransactionManager
implementations as a context for the ongoing operation. If there is
already a transaction in progress when the framework is sending or
receiving a message, and the channelTransacted
flag is true,
then the commit or rollback of the messaging transaction will be deferred
until the end of the current transaction. If the
channelTransacted
flag is false, then no transaction
semantics apply to the messaging operation (it is auto-acked).
The channelTransacted
flag is a configuration
time setting: it is declared and processed once when the AMQP components
are created, usually at application startup. The external transaction is
more dynamic in principle because the system responds to the current
Thread state at runtime, but in practice is often also a configuration
setting, when the transactions are layered onto an application
declaratively.
For synchronous use cases with RabbitTemplate
the external transaction is provided by the caller, either declaratively
or imperatively according to taste (the usual Spring transaction model).
An example of a declarative approach (usually preferred because it is
non-invasive), where the template has been configured with
channelTransacted=true
:
@Transactional public void doSomething() { String incoming = rabbitTemplate.receiveAndConvert(); // do some more database processing... String outgoing = processInDatabaseAndExtractReply(incoming); rabbitTemplate.convertAndSend(outgoing); }
A String payload is received, converted and sent as a message body
inside a method marked as @Transactional, so if the database processing
fails with an exception, the incoming message will be returned to the
broker, and the outgoing message will not be sent. This applies to any
operations with the RabbitTemplate
inside a chain
of transactional methods (unless the Channel
is
directly manipulated to commit the transaction early for instance).
For asynchronous use cases with
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
if an external
transaction is needed it has to be requested by the container when it sets
up the listener. To signal that an external transaction is required the
user provides an implementation of
PlatformTransactionManager
to the container when it
is configured. For example:
@Configuration public class ExampleExternalTransactionAmqpConfiguration { @Bean public MessageListenerContainer messageListenerContainer() { SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(); container.setConnectionFactory(rabbitConnectionFactory()); container.setTransactionManager(transactionManager()); container.setChannelTransacted(true); container.setQueueName("some.queue"); container.setMessageListener(exampleListener()); return container; } }
In the example above, the transaction manager is added as a
dependency injected from another bean definition (not shown), and the
channelTransacted
flag is also set to true. The effect is
that if the listener fails with an exception the transaction will be
rolled back, and the message will also be returned to the broker.
Significantly, if the transaction fails to commit (e.g. a database
constraint error, or connectivity problem), then the AMQP transaction will
also be rolled back, and the message will be returned to the broker. This is
sometimes known as a Best Efforts 1 Phase Commit, and is a very powerful
pattern for reliable messaging. If the channelTransacted
flag
was set to false in the example above, which is the default, then the
external transaction would still be provided for the listener, but all
messaging operations would be auto-acked, so the effect is to commit the
messaging operations even on a rollback of the business operation.
AMQP transactions only apply to messages and acks sent to the broker, so when there is a rollback of a Spring transaction and a message has been received, what Spring AMQP has to do is not just rollback the transaction, but also manually reject the message (sort of a nack, but that's not what the specification calls it). Such messages (and any that are unacked when a channel is closed or aborts) go to the back of the queue on a Rabbit broker, and this behaviour is not what some users expect, especially if they come from a JMS background, so it's good to be aware of it. The re-queuing order is not mandated by the AMQP specification, but it makes the broker much more efficient, and also means that if it is under load there is a natural back off before the message can be consumed again.
The RabbitTransactionManager is an alternative to executing Rabbit operations within, and synchronized with, external transactions. This Transaction Manager is an implementation of the PlatformTransactionManager interface and should be used with a single Rabbit ConnectionFactory.
![]() | Important |
---|---|
This strategy is not able to provide XA transactions, for example in order to share transactions between messaging and database access. |
Application code is required to retrieve the transactional Rabbit resources
via ConnectionFactoryUtils.getTransactionalResourceHolder(ConnectionFactory, boolean)
instead of a standard Connection.createChannel()
call with
subsequent Channel creation. When using Spring's
RabbitTemplate
,
it will autodetect a thread-bound Channel and automatically participate
in it.
With Java Configuration you can setup a new RabbitTransactionManager using:
@Bean public RabbitTransactionManager rabbitTransactionManager() { return new RabbitTransactionManager(connectionFactory); }
If you prefer using XML configuration, declare the following bean in your XML Application Context file:
<bean id="rabbitTxManager" class="org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.transaction.RabbitTransactionManager"> <property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory"/> </bean>
There are quite a few options for configuring a
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
related to
transactions and quality of service, and some of them interact with each
other.
When configuring with the XML namespace, the convention is to use hyphenated attributes rather than camel case; for example, for property 'connectionFactory', the XML equivalent is 'connection-factory'.
Table 2.1. Configuration options for a message listener container
Property | Description |
---|---|
channelTransacted | Boolean flag to signal that all messages should be acknowledged in a transaction (either manually or automatically) |
acknowledgeMode | NONE = no acks will be sent (the
default and incompatible with
channelTransacted=true ). RabbitMQ calls this
"autoack" because the broker assumes all messages are acked
without any action from the consumer. MANUAL = the listener must
acknowledge all messages by calling
Channel.basicAck() . AUTO = the container will
acknowledge the message automatically. Note that
acknowledgeMode is complementary to
channelTransacted - if the channel is transacted then the broker
requires a commit notification in addition to the ack. |
transactionManager | External transaction manager for the operation of the
listener. Also complementary to channelTransacted - if the
Channel is transacted then its
transaction will be synchronized with the external
transaction. |
prefetchCount | The number of messages to accept from the broker in one
socket frame. The higher this is the faster the messages can be
delivered, but the higher the risk of non-sequential processing.
Ignored if the acknowledgeMode is
NONE. |
shutdownTimeout | When a container shuts down (e.g. if its enclosing
ApplicationContext is closed) it waits
for in-flight messages to be processed up to this limit.
Defaults to 10 seconds. After the limit is reached, if the
channel is not transacted messages will be discarded. |
txSize | If the channel is transacted or an external transaction manager is provided, the container will attempt to process up to this number of messages per transaction (waiting for each one up to the receive timeout setting). |
receiveTimeout | The maximum time to wait for each message. If
acknowledgeMode=NONE (the default) this has very little effect -
the container just spins round and asks for another message. It
has the biggest effect for a transactional
Channel with txSize > 1 ,
since it can cause messages already consumed not to be
acknowledged until the timeout expires. |
autoStartup | Flag to indicate that the container should start when the
ApplicationContext does (as part of the
SmartLifecycle callbacks which happen
after all beans are initialized). Defaults to true, but set it
to false if your broker might not be available on startup, and
then call start() later manually when you know the
broker is ready. |
phase | When autoStartup is true, the lifecycle phase within which this container should start and stop. The lower the value the earlier this container will start and the later it will stop. The default is Integer.MAX_VALUE meaning the container will start as late as possible and stop as soon as possible. |
adviceChain | An array of AOP Advice to apply to the listener
execution. This can be used to apply additional cross cutting
concerns such as automatic retry in the event of broker death.
Note that simple re-connection after an AMQP error is handled by
the CachingConnectionFactory , as long as
the broker is still alive. |
taskExecutor | A reference to a Spring TaskExecutor (or standard JDK 1.5+ Executor) for executing listener invokers. Default is a SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor, using internally managed threads. |
errorHandler | A reference to an ErrorHandler strategy for handling any uncaught Exceptions that may occur during the execution of the MessageListener. |
concurrency | The number of concurrent consumers to start for each listener. |
connectionFactory | A reference to the connectionFactory; when configuring using the XML namespace, the default referenced bean name is "rabbitConnectionFactory". |
messageConverter | A reference to the MessageConverter strategy for converting AMQP Messages to listener method arguments for any referenced 'listener' that is a POJO. Default is a SimpleMessageConverter. |
requeueRejected | Determines whether messages that are rejected because the listener threw an exception should be requeued or not. Default 'true'. |
Some of the key (and most popular) high-level features that Spring AMQP provides are to do with recovery and automatic re-connection in the event of a protocol error or broker failure. We have seen all the relevant components already in this guide, but it should help to bring them all together here and call out the features and recovery scenarios individually.
The primary reconnection features are enabled by the
CachingConnectionFactory
itself.
It is also often beneficial to use the RabbitAdmin
auto-declaration features. In addition, if you care about
guaranteed delivery, you probably also need to use the
channelTransacted
flag in
RabbitTemplate
and
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
and also the
AcknowledgeMode.AUTO
(or manual if you do the acks
yourself) in the
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
.
The RabbitAdmin
component can
declare exchanges, queues and bindings on startup. It does this
lazily, through a ConnectionListener
, so
if the broker is not present on startup it doesn't matter. The
first time a Connection
is used (e.g. by
sending a message) the listener will fire and the admin features
will be applied. A further benefit of doing the auto
declarations in a listener is that if the connection is dropped
for any reason (e.g. broker death, network glitch, etc.) they
will be applied again the next time they are needed.
If you lose your connection to the broker in a synchronous
sequence using RabbitTemplate
(for
instance), then Spring AMQP will throw an
AmqpException
(usually but not always
AmqpIOException
). We don't try to hide
the fact that there was a problem, so you have to be able to
catch and respond to the exception. The easiest thing to do if
you suspect that the connection was lost, and it wasn't your
fault, is to simply try the operation again. You can do this
manually, or you could look at using Spring Retry to handle the
retry (imperatively or declaratively).
Spring Retry provides a couple of AOP interceptors and a
great deal of flexibility to specify the parameters of the retry
(number of attempts, exception types, backoff algorithm etc.).
Spring AMQP also provides some convenience factory beans for
creating Spring Retry interceptors in a convenient form for AMQP
use cases, with strongly typed callback interfaces for you to
implement custom recovery logic. See the Javadocs and
properties of
StatefulRetryOperationsInterceptor
and
StatelessRetryOperationsInterceptor
for
more detail. Stateless retry is appropriate if there is no
transaction or if a transaction is started inside the retry
callback. Note that stateless retry is simpler to configure and
analyse than stateful retry, but it is not usually appropriate
if there is an ongoing transaction which must be rolled back or
definitely is going to roll back. A dropped connection in the
middle of a transaction should have the same effect as a
rollback, so for reconnection where the transaction is started
higher up the stack, stateful retry is usually the best
choice.
If a MessageListener
fails because
of a business exception, the exception is handled by the message
listener container and then it goes back to listening for
another message. If the failure is caused by a dropped
connection (not a business exception), then the consumer that is
collecting messages for the listener has to be cancelled and
restarted. The
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
handles
this seamlessly, and it leaves a log to say that the listener is
being restarted. In fact it loops endlessly trying to restart
the consumer, and only if the consumer is very badly behaved
indeed will it give up. One side effect is that if the broker
is down when the container starts, it will just keep trying
until a connection can be established.
Business exception handling, as opposed to protocol errors
and dropped connections, might need more thought and some custom
configuration, especially if transactions and/or container acks
are in use. Prior to 2.8.x, RabbitMQ had no definition of dead letter behaviour, so
by default a message that is rejected or rolled back because of
a business exception can be redelivered ad infinitum. To put a
limit in the client on the number of re-deliveries, one
choice is a
StatefulRetryOperationsInterceptor
in the
advice chain of the listener. The interceptor can have a
recovery callback that implements a custom dead letter action:
whatever is appropriate for your particular environment.
Another alternative is to set the container's rejectRequeued property to false. This causes all failed messages to be discarded. When using RabbitMQ 2.8.x or higher, this also facilitates delivering the message to a Dead Letter Exchange.
Or, you can throw a AmqpRejectAndDontRequeueException
;
this prevents message requeuing, regardless of the setting of the
rejectRequeued property.
Often, a combination of both techniques will be used. Use a
StatefulRetryOperationsInterceptor
in the
advice chain, where it's MessageRecover
throws an AmqpRejectAndDontRequeueException
.
The MessageRecover
is called when all
retries have been exhausted. The default
MessageRecoverer
simply consumes the
errant message and emits a WARN message. In which case,
the message is ACK'd and won't be sent to the Dead Letter
Exchange, if any.
There is an open source project called JInterface that provides a way for Java applications to communicate with an Erlang process. The API is very low level and rather tedious to use and throws checked exceptions. The Spring Erlang module makes accessing functions in Erlang from Java easy, often they can be one liners.
The interface ErlangOperations is the high level API for interacting with an Erlang process.
public interface ErlangOperations { <T> T execute(ConnectionCallback<T> action) throws OtpException; OtpErlangObject executeErlangRpc(String module, String function, OtpErlangList args) throws OtpException; OtpErlangObject executeErlangRpc(String module, String function, OtpErlangObject... args) throws OtpException; OtpErlangObject executeRpc(String module, String function, Object... args) throws OtpException; Object executeAndConvertRpc(String module, String function, ErlangConverter converterToUse, Object... args) throws OtpException; // Sweet! Object executeAndConvertRpc(String module, String function, Object... args) throws OtpException; }
The class that implements this interface is called
ErlangTemplate
. There are a few convenience
methods, most notably executeAndConvertRpc
, as
well as the execute
method which gives you
access to the 'native' API of the JInterface project. For simple
functions, you can invoke executeAndConvertRpc
with the appropriate Erlang module name, function, and arguments in a
one-liner. For example, here is the implementation of the
RabbitBrokerAdmin method 'DeleteUser'
@ManagedOperation public void deleteUser(String username) { erlangTemplate.executeAndConvertRpc( "rabbit_access_control", "delete_user", username.getBytes()); }
As the JInterface library uses specific classes such as OtpErlangDouble and OtpErlangString to represent the primitive types in Erlang RPC calls, there is a converter class that works in concert with ErlangTemplate that knows how to translate from Java primitive types to their Erlang class equivalents. You can also create custom converters and register them with the ErlangTemplate to handle more complex data format translations.
The ErlangConverter interface is shown below.
public interface ErlangConverter { /** * Convert a Java object to a Erlang data type. * @param object the object to convert * @return the Erlang data type * @throws ErlangConversionException in case of conversion failure */ OtpErlangObject toErlang(Object object) throws ErlangConversionException; /** * Convert from a Erlang data type to a Java object. * @param erlangObject the Erlang object to convert * @return the converted Java object * @throws ErlangConversionException in case of conversion failure */ Object fromErlang(OtpErlangObject erlangObject) throws ErlangConversionException; /** * The return value from executing the Erlang RPC. */ Object fromErlangRpc(String module, String function, OtpErlangObject erlangObject) throws ErlangConversionException; }
The Spring AMQP Samples project includes two sample applications. The first is a simple "Hello World" example that demonstrates both synchronous and asynchronous message reception. It provides an excellent starting point for acquiring an understanding of the essential components. The second sample is based on a stock-trading use case to demonstrate the types of interaction that would be common in real world applications. In this chapter, we will provide a quick walk-through of each sample so that you can focus on the most important components. The samples are both Maven-based, so you should be able to import them directly into any Maven-aware IDE (such as SpringSource Tool Suite).
The Hello World sample demonstrates both synchronous and asynchronous message reception. You can import the 'spring-rabbit-helloworld' sample into the IDE and then follow the discussion below.
Within the 'src/main/java' directory, navigate to the 'org.springframework.amqp.helloworld' package. Open the HelloWorldConfiguration class and notice that it contains the @Configuration annotation at class-level and some @Bean annotations at method-level. This is an example of Spring's Java-based configuration. You can read more about that here.
@Bean public ConnectionFactory connectionFactory() { CachingConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory("localhost"); connectionFactory.setUsername("guest"); connectionFactory.setPassword("guest"); return connectionFactory; }
The configuration also contains an instance
of RabbitAdmin
, which by default looks
for any beans of type Exchange, Queue, or Binding and then
declares them on the broker. In fact, the "helloWorldQueue" bean
that is generated in HelloWorldConfiguration is an example
simply because it is an instance of Queue.
@Bean public Queue helloWorldQueue() { return new Queue(this.helloWorldQueueName); }
Looking back at the "rabbitTemplate" bean configuration, you will see that it has the helloWorldQueue's name set as its "queue" property (for receiving Messages) and for its "routingKey" property (for sending Messages).
Now that we've explored the configuration, let's look at the code that actually uses these components. First, open the Producer class from within the same package. It contains a main() method where the Spring ApplicationContext is created.
public static void main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(RabbitConfiguration.class); AmqpTemplate amqpTemplate = context.getBean(AmqpTemplate.class); amqpTemplate.convertAndSend("Hello World"); System.out.println("Sent: Hello World"); }
As you can see in the example above, the AmqpTemplate bean is retrieved and used for sending a Message. Since the client code should rely on interfaces whenever possible, the type is AmqpTemplate rather than RabbitTemplate. Even though the bean created in HelloWorldConfiguration is an instance of RabbitTemplate, relying on the interface means that this code is more portable (the configuration can be changed independently of the code). Since the convertAndSend() method is invoked, the template will be delegating to its MessageConverter instance. In this case, it's using the default SimpleMessageConverter, but a different implementation could be provided to the "rabbitTemplate" bean as defined in HelloWorldConfiguration.
Now open the Consumer class. It actually shares the same configuration base class which means it will be sharing the "rabbitTemplate" bean. That's why we configured that template with both a "routingKey" (for sending) and "queue" (for receiving). As you saw in Section 2.3, “AmqpTemplate”, you could instead pass the 'routingKey' argument to the send method and the 'queue' argument to the receive method. The Consumer code is basically a mirror image of the Producer, calling receiveAndConvert() rather than convertAndSend().
public static void main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(RabbitConfiguration.class); AmqpTemplate amqpTemplate = context.getBean(AmqpTemplate.class); System.out.println("Received: " + amqpTemplate.receiveAndConvert()); }
If you run the Producer, and then run the Consumer, you should see the message "Received: Hello World" in the console output.
Now that we've walked through the synchronous Hello World sample, it's time to move on to a slightly more advanced but significantly more powerful option. With a few modifications, the Hello World sample can provide an example of asynchronous reception, a.k.a. Message-driven POJOs. In fact, there is a sub-package that provides exactly that: org.springframework.amqp.samples.helloworld.async.
Once again, we will start with the sending side. Open the ProducerConfiguration class and notice that it creates a "connectionFactory" and "rabbitTemplate" bean. This time, since the configuration is dedicated to the message sending side, we don't even need any Queue definitions, and the RabbitTemplate only has the 'routingKey' property set. Recall that messages are sent to an Exchange rather than being sent directly to a Queue. The AMQP default Exchange is a direct Exchange with no name. All Queues are bound to that default Exchange with their name as the routing key. That is why we only need to provide the routing key here.
public RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate() { RabbitTemplate template = new RabbitTemplate(connectionFactory()); template.setRoutingKey(this.helloWorldQueueName); return template; }
Since this sample will be demonstrating asynchronous message reception, the producing side is designed to continuously send messages (if it were a message-per-execution model like the synchronous version, it would not be quite so obvious that it is in fact a message-driven consumer). The component responsible for sending messages continuously is defined as an inner class within the ProducerConfiguration. It is configured to execute every 3 seconds.
static class ScheduledProducer { @Autowired private volatile RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate; private final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(); @Scheduled(fixedRate = 3000) public void sendMessage() { rabbitTemplate.convertAndSend("Hello World " + counter.incrementAndGet()); } }
You don't need to understand all of the details since the real focus should be on the receiving side (which we will cover momentarily). However, if you are not yet familiar with Spring 3.0 task scheduling support, you can learn more here. The short story is that the "postProcessor" bean in the ProducerConfiguration is registering the task with a scheduler.
Now, let's turn to the receiving side. To emphasize the Message-driven POJO behavior will start with the component that is reacting to the messages. The class is called HelloWorldHandler.
public class HelloWorldHandler { public void handleMessage(String text) { System.out.println("Received: " + text); } }
Clearly, that is a POJO. It does not extend any base class, it doesn't implement any interfaces, and it doesn't even contain any imports. It is being "adapted" to the MessageListener interface by the Spring AMQP MessageListenerAdapter. That adapter can then be configured on a SimpleMessageListenerContainer. For this sample, the container is created in the ConsumerConfiguration class. You can see the POJO wrapped in the adapter there.
@Bean public SimpleMessageListenerContainer listenerContainer() { SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(); container.setConnectionFactory(connectionFactory()); container.setQueueName(this.helloWorldQueueName); container.setMessageListener(new MessageListenerAdapter(new HelloWorldHandler())); return container; }
The SimpleMessageListenerContainer is a Spring lifecycle component and will start automatically by default. If you look in the Consumer class, you will see that its main() method consists of nothing more than a one-line bootstrap to create the ApplicationContext. The Producer's main() method is also a one-line bootstrap, since the component whose method is annotated with @Scheduled will also start executing automatically. You can start the Producer and Consumer in any order, and you should see messages being sent and received every 3 seconds.
The Stock Trading sample demonstrates more advanced messaging scenarios than the Hello World sample. However, the configuration is very similar - just a bit more involved. Since we've walked through the Hello World configuration in detail, here we'll focus on what makes this sample different. There is a server that pushes market data (stock quotes) to a Topic Exchange. Then, clients can subscribe to the market data feed by binding a Queue with a routing pattern (e.g. "app.stock.quotes.nasdaq.*"). The other main feature of this demo is a request-reply "stock trade" interaction that is initiated by the client and handled by the server. That involves a private "replyTo" Queue that is sent by the client within the order request Message itself.
The Server's core configuration is in the RabbitServerConfiguration class within the org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.stocks.config.server package. It extends the AbstractStockAppRabbitConfiguration. That is where the resources common to the Server and Client(s) are defined, including the market data Topic Exchange (whose name is 'app.stock.marketdata') and the Queue that the Server exposes for stock trades (whose name is 'app.stock.request'). In that common configuration file, you will also see that a JsonMessageConverter is configured on the RabbitTemplate.
The Server-specific configuration consists of 2 things. First, it configures the market data exchange on the RabbitTemplate so that it does not need to provide that exchange name with every call to send a Message. It does this within an abstract callback method defined in the base configuration class.
public void configureRabbitTemplate(RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate) { rabbitTemplate.setExchange(MARKET_DATA_EXCHANGE_NAME); }
Secondly, the stock request queue is declared. It does not require any explicit bindings in this case, because it will be bound to the default no-name exchange with its own name as the routing key. As mentioned earlier, the AMQP specification defines that behavior.
@Bean public Queue stockRequestQueue() { return new Queue(STOCK_REQUEST_QUEUE_NAME); }
Now that you've seen the configuration of the Server's AMQP resources, navigate to the 'org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.stocks' package under the 'src/test/java' directory. There you will see the actual Server class that provides a main() method. It creates an ApplicationContext based on the 'server-bootstrap.xml' config file. In there you will see the scheduled task that publishes dummy market data. That configuration relies upon Spring 3.0's "task" namespace support. The bootstrap config file also imports a few other files. The most interesting one is 'server-messaging.xml' which is directly under 'src/main/resources'. In there you will see the "messageListenerContainer" bean that is responsible for handling the stock trade requests. Finally have a look at the "serverHandler" bean that is defined in "server-handlers.xml" (also in 'src/main/resources'). That bean is an instance of the ServerHandler class and is a good example of a Message-driven POJO that is also capable of sending reply Messages. Notice that it is not itself coupled to the framework or any of the AMQP concepts. It simply accepts a TradeRequest and returns a TradeResponse.
public TradeResponse handleMessage(TradeRequest tradeRequest) { ... }
Now that we've seen the most important configuration and code for the Server, let's turn to the Client. The best starting point is probably RabbitClientConfiguration within the 'org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.stocks.config.client' package. Notice that it declares two queues without providing explicit names.
@Bean public Queue marketDataQueue() { return amqpAdmin().declareQueue(); } @Bean public Queue traderJoeQueue() { return amqpAdmin().declareQueue(); }
Those are private queues, and unique names will be generated automatically. The first generated queue is used by the Client to bind to the market data exchange that has been exposed by the Server. Recall that in AMQP, consumers interact with Queues while producers interact with Exchanges. The "binding" of Queues to Exchanges is what instructs the broker to deliver, or route, messages from a given Exchange to a Queue. Since the market data exchange is a Topic Exchange, the binding can be expressed with a routing pattern. The RabbitClientConfiguration declares that with a Binding object, and that object is generated with the BindingBuilder's fluent API.
@Value("${stocks.quote.pattern}") private String marketDataRoutingKey; @Bean public Binding marketDataBinding() { return BindingBuilder.bind( marketDataQueue()).to(marketDataExchange()).with(marketDataRoutingKey); }
Notice that the actual value has been externalized in a properties file ("client.properties" under src/main/resources), and that we are using Spring's @Value annotation to inject that value. This is generally a good idea, since otherwise the value would have been hardcoded in a class and unmodifiable without recompilation. In this case, it makes it much easier to run multiple versions of the Client while making changes to the routing pattern used for binding. Let's try that now.
Start by running org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.stocks.Server and then org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.stocks.Client. You should see dummy quotes for NASDAQ stocks because the current value associated with the 'stocks.quote.pattern' key in client.properties is 'app.stock.quotes.nasdaq.*'. Now, while keeping the existing Server and Client running, change that property value to 'app.stock.quotes.nyse.*' and start a second Client instance. You should see that the first client is still receiving NASDAQ quotes while the second client receives NYSE quotes. You could instead change the pattern to get all stocks or even an individual ticker.
The final feature we'll explore is the request-reply interaction from the Client's perspective. Recall that we have already seen the ServerHandler that is accepting TradeRequest objects and returning TradeResponse objects. The corresponding code on the Client side is RabbitStockServiceGateway in the 'org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.stocks.gateway' package. It delegates to the RabbitTemplate in order to send Messages.
public void send(TradeRequest tradeRequest) { getRabbitTemplate().convertAndSend(tradeRequest, new MessagePostProcessor() { public Message postProcessMessage(Message message) throws AmqpException { message.getMessageProperties().setReplyTo(new Address(defaultReplyToQueue)); try { message.getMessageProperties().setCorrelationId( UUID.randomUUID().toString().getBytes("UTF-8")); } catch (UnsupportedEncodingException e) { throw new AmqpException(e); } return message; } }); }
Notice that prior to sending the message, it sets the "replyTo" address. It's providing the queue that was generated by the "traderJoeQueue" bean definition shown above. Here's the @Bean definition for the StockServiceGateway class itself.
@Bean public StockServiceGateway stockServiceGateway() { RabbitStockServiceGateway gateway = new RabbitStockServiceGateway(); gateway.setRabbitTemplate(rabbitTemplate()); gateway.setDefaultReplyToQueue(traderJoeQueue()); return gateway; }
If you are no longer running the Server and Client, start them now. Try sending a request with the format of '100 TCKR'. After a brief artificial delay that simulates "processing" of the request, you should see a confirmation message appear on the Client.
This part of the reference documentation provides a quick introduction to the AMQP support within the Spring Integration project.
The Spring Integration project includes AMQP Channel Adapters and Gateways that build upon the Spring AMQP project. Those adapters are developed and released in the Spring Integration project. In Spring Integration, "Channel Adapters" are unidirectional (one-way) whereas "Gateways" are bidirectional (request-reply). We provide an inbound-channel-adapter, outbound-channel-adapter, inbound-gateway, and outbound-gateway.
Since the AMQP adapters are part of the Spring Integration release, the documentation will be available as part of the Spring Integration distribution. As a taster, we just provide a quick overview of the main features here.
To receive AMQP Messages from a Queue, configure an <inbound-channel-adapter>
<amqp:inbound-channel-adapter channel="fromAMQP" queue-names="some.queue" connection-factory="rabbitConnectionFactory"/>
To send AMQP Messages to an Exchange, configure an <outbound-channel-adapter>. A 'routing-key' may optionally be provided in addition to the exchange name.
<amqp:outbound-channel-adapter channel="toAMQP" exchange-name="some.exchange" routing-key="foo" amqp-template="rabbitTemplate"/>
To receive an AMQP Message from a Queue, and respond to its reply-to address, configure an <inbound-gateway>.
<amqp:inbound-gateway request-channel="fromAMQP" reply-channel="toAMQP" queue-names="some.queue" connection-factory="rabbitConnectionFactory"/>
To send AMQP Messages to an Exchange and receive back a response from a remote client, configure an <outbound-gateway>. A 'routing-key' may optionally be provided in addition to the exchange name.
<amqp:outbound-gateway request-channel="toAMQP" reply-channel="fromAMQP" exchange-name="some.exchange" routing-key="foo" amqp-template="rabbitTemplate"/>
In addition to this reference documentation, there exist a number of other resources that may help you learn about AMQP.
For those who are not familiar with AMQP, the specification is actually quite readable. It is of course the authoritative source of information, and the Spring AMQP code should be very easy to understand for anyone who is familiar with the spec. Our current implementation of the RabbitMQ support is based on their 2.8.x version, and it officially supports AMQP 0.8 and 0.9.1. We recommend reading the 0.9.1 document.
There are many great articles, presentations, and blogs available on the RabbitMQ Getting Started page. Since that is currently the only supported implementation for Spring AMQP, we also recommend that as a general starting point for all broker-related concerns.
Finally, be sure to visit the Spring AMQP Forum if you have questions or suggestions. With this first GA release, we are looking forward to a lot of community feedback!
[jinterface-00] jinterface User Guide. Ericson AB . 2000.