1.3.5.RELEASE
Copyright © 2008-2013 The original authors
Table of Contents
Version control - git://github.com/SpringSource/spring-data-jpa.git
Bugtracker - https://jira.springsource.org/browse/DATAJPA
Release repository - http://repo.springsource.org/libs-release
Milestone repository - http://repo.springsource.org/libs-milestone
Snapshot repository - http://repo.springsource.org/libs-snapshot
The goal of Spring Data repository abstraction is to significantly reduce the amount of boilerplate code required to implement data access layers for various persistence stores.
Important | |
---|---|
Spring Data repository documentation and your module This chapter explains the core concepts and interfaces of Spring Data repositories. The information in this chapter is pulled from the Spring Data Commons module. It uses the configuration and code samples for the Java Persistence API (JPA) module. Adapt the XML namespace declaration and the types to be extended to the equivalents of the particular module that you are using. Appendix A, Namespace reference covers XML configuration which is supported across all Spring Data modules supporting the repository API, Appendix B, Repository query keywords covers the query method method keywords supported by the repository abstraction in general. For detailed information on the specific features of your module, consult the chapter on that module of this document. |
The central interface in Spring Data repository abstraction is
Repository
(probably not that much of a
surprise). It takes the the domain class to manage as well as the id type
of the domain class as type arguments. This interface acts primarily as a
marker interface to capture the types to work with and to help you to
discover interfaces that extend this one. The
CrudRepository
provides sophisticated CRUD
functionality for the entity class that is being managed.
Example 1.1. CrudRepository
interface
public interface CrudRepository<T, ID extends Serializable> extends Repository<T, ID> { <S extends T> S save(S entity); T findOne(ID primaryKey); Iterable<T> findAll(); Long count(); void delete(T entity); boolean exists(ID primaryKey); // … more functionality omitted. }
Saves the given entity. | |
Returns the entity identified by the given id. | |
Returns all entities. | |
Returns the number of entities. | |
Deletes the given entity. | |
Indicates whether an entity with the given id exists. |
Usually we will have persistence technology specific sub-interfaces
to include additional technology specific methods. We will now ship
implementations for a variety of Spring Data modules that implement
CrudRepository
.
On top of the CrudRepository
there is
a PagingAndSortingRepository
abstraction
that adds additional methods to ease paginated access to entities:
Example 1.2. PagingAndSortingRepository
public interface PagingAndSortingRepository<T, ID extends Serializable> extends CrudRepository<T, ID> { Iterable<T> findAll(Sort sort); Page<T> findAll(Pageable pageable); }
Accessing the second page of User
by a page
size of 20 you could simply do something like this:
PagingAndSortingRepository<User, Long> repository = // … get access to a bean Page<User> users = repository.findAll(new PageRequest(1, 20));
Standard CRUD functionality repositories usually have queries on the underlying datastore. With Spring Data, declaring those queries becomes a four-step process:
Declare an interface extending
Repository
or one of its subinterfaces
and type it to the domain class that it will handle.
public interface PersonRepository extends Repository<User, Long> { … }
Declare query methods on the interface.
List<Person> findByLastname(String lastname);
Set up Spring to create proxy instances for those interfaces.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans:beans xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa/spring-jpa.xsd"> <repositories base-package="com.acme.repositories" /> </beans>
Note | |
---|---|
The JPA namespace is used in this example. If you are using
the repository abstraction for any other store, you need to change
this to the appropriate namespace declaration of your store module
which should be exchanging |
Get the repository instance injected and use it.
public class SomeClient { @Autowired private PersonRepository repository; public void doSomething() { List<Person> persons = repository.findByLastname("Matthews"); } }
The sections that follow explain each step.
As a first step you define a domain class-specific repository
interface. The interface must extend
Repository
and be typed to the domain
class and an ID type. If you want to expose CRUD methods for that domain
type, extend CrudRepository
instead of
Repository
.
Typically, your repository interface will extend
Repository
,
CrudRepository
or
PagingAndSortingRepository
.
Alternatively, if you do not want to extend Spring Data interfaces,
you can also annotate your repository interface with
@RepositoryDefinition
.
Extending CrudRepository
exposes a
complete set of methods to manipulate your entities. If you prefer to
be selective about the methods being exposed, simply copy the ones you
want to expose from CrudRepository
into
your domain repository.
Example 1.3. Selectively exposing CRUD methods
interface MyBaseRepository<T, ID extends Serializable> extends Repository<T, ID> { T findOne(ID id); T save(T entity); } interface UserRepository extends MyBaseRepository<User, Long> { User findByEmailAddress(EmailAddress emailAddress); }
In this first step you defined a common base interface for all
your domain repositories and exposed
findOne(…)
as well as
save(…)
.These methods will be routed into the
base repository implementation of the store of your choice provided by
Spring Data because they are matching the method signatures in
CrudRepository
. So the
UserRepository
will now be able to save
users, and find single ones by id, as well as triggering a query to
find User
s by their email
address.
The repository proxy has two ways to derive a store-specific query from the method name. It can derive the query from the method name directly, or by using an additionally created query. Available options depend on the actual store. However, there's got to be an strategy that decides what actual query is created. Let's have a look at the available options.
The following strategies are available for the repository
infrastructure to resolve the query. You can configure the strategy at
the namespace through the query-lookup-strategy
attribute. Some strategies may not be supported for particular
datastores.
CREATE
attempts to construct a store-specific
query from the query method name. The general approach is to remove
a given set of well-known prefixes from the method name and parse
the rest of the method. Read more about query construction in the section called “Query creation”.
USE_DECLARED_QUERY
tries to find a declared query
and will throw an exception in case it can't find one. The query can
be defined by an annotation somewhere or declared by other means.
Consult the documentation of the specific store to find available
options for that store. If the repository infrastructure does not
find a declared query for the method at bootstrap time, it
fails.
CREATE_IF_NOT_FOUND
combines CREATE
and USE_DECLARED_QUERY
. It looks up a declared query
first, and if no declared query is found, it creates a custom method
name-based query. This is the default lookup strategy and thus will
be used if you do not configure anything explicitly. It allows quick
query definition by method names but also custom-tuning of these
queries by introducing declared queries as needed.
The query builder mechanism built into Spring Data repository
infrastructure is useful for building constraining queries over
entities of the repository. The mechanism strips the prefixes
find…By
, read…By
, and get…By
from the method and starts parsing the rest of it. The introducing
clause can contain further expressions such as a Distinct
to set a distinct flag on the query to be created. However, the first
By
acts as delimiter to indicate the start of the actual
criteria. At a very basic level you can define conditions on entity
properties and concatenate them with And
and Or
.
Example 1.4. Query creation from method names
public interface PersonRepository extends Repository<User, Long> { List<Person> findByEmailAddressAndLastname(EmailAddress emailAddress, String lastname); // Enables the distinct flag for the query List<Person> findDistinctPeopleByLastnameOrFirstname(String lastname, String firstname); List<Person> findPeopleDistinctByLastnameOrFirstname(String lastname, String firstname); // Enabling ignoring case for an individual property List<Person> findByLastnameIgnoreCase(String lastname); // Enabling ignoring case for all suitable properties List<Person> findByLastnameAndFirstnameAllIgnoreCase(String lastname, String firstname); // Enabling static ORDER BY for a query List<Person> findByLastnameOrderByFirstnameAsc(String lastname); List<Person> findByLastnameOrderByFirstnameDesc(String lastname); }
The actual result of parsing the method depends on the persistence store for which you create the query. However, there are some general things to notice.
The expressions are usually property traversals combined
with operators that can be concatenated. You can combine
property expressions with AND
and OR
.
You also get support for operators such as
Between
, LessThan
,
GreaterThan
, Like
for the
property expressions. The supported operators can vary by
datastore, so consult the appropriate part of your reference
documentation.
The method parser supports setting an
IgnoreCase
flag for individual properties, for
example,findByLastnameIgnoreCase(…)
) or
for all properties of a type that support ignoring case (usually
String
s, for example,
findByLastnameAndFirstnameAllIgnoreCase(…)
).
Whether ignoring cases is supported may vary by store, so
consult the relevant sections in the reference documentation for
the store-specific query method.
You can apply static ordering by appending an
OrderBy
clause to the query method that references
a property and by providing a sorting direction
(Asc
or Desc
). To create a query
method that supports dynamic sorting, see the section called “Special parameter handling”.
Property expressions can refer only to a direct property of the
managed entity, as shown in the preceding example. At query creation
time you already make sure that the parsed property is a property of
the managed domain class. However, you can also define constraints by
traversing nested properties. Assume Person
s
have Address
es with
ZipCode
s. In that case a method name of
List<Person> findByAddressZipCode(ZipCode zipCode);
creates the property traversal x.address.zipCode
.
The resolution algorithm starts with interpreting the entire part
(AddressZipCode
) as the property and checks the
domain class for a property with that name (uncapitalized). If the
algorithm succeeds it uses that property. If not, the algorithm splits
up the source at the camel case parts from the right side into a head
and a tail and tries to find the corresponding property, in our
example, AddressZip
and Code
. If
the algorithm finds a property with that head it takes the tail and
continue building the tree down from there, splitting the tail up in
the way just described. If the first split does not match, the
algorithm move the split point to the left
(Address
, ZipCode
) and
continues.
Although this should work for most cases, it is possible for the
algorithm to select the wrong property. Suppose the
Person
class has an addressZip
property as well. The algorithm would match in the first split round
already and essentially choose the wrong
property and finally fail (as the type of
addressZip
probably has no code property). To resolve this ambiguity you
can use _
inside your method name to manually
define traversal points. So our method name would end up like
so:
List<Person> findByAddress_ZipCode(ZipCode zipCode);
To handle parameters to your query you simply define method
parameters as already seen in the examples above. Besides that the
infrastructure will recognize certain specific types like
Pageable
and
Sort
to apply pagination and sorting to your
queries dynamically.
Example 1.5. Using Pageable and Sort in query methods
Page<User> findByLastname(String lastname, Pageable pageable); List<User> findByLastname(String lastname, Sort sort); List<User> findByLastname(String lastname, Pageable pageable);
The first method allows you to pass an
org.springframework.data.domain.Pageable
instance to the
query method to dynamically add paging to your statically defined
query. Sorting options are handled through the
Pageable
instance too. If you only need
sorting, simply add an
org.springframework.data.domain.Sort
parameter to your
method. As you also can see, simply returning a
List
is possible as well. In this case
the additional metadata required to build the actual
Page
instance will not be created
(which in turn means that the additional count query that would have
been necessary not being issued) but rather simply restricts the query
to look up only the given range of entities.
Note | |
---|---|
To find out how many pages you get for a query entirely you have to trigger an additional count query. By default this query will be derived from the query you actually trigger. |
In this section you create instances and bean definitions for the repository interfaces defined. The easiest way to do so is by using the Spring namespace that is shipped with each Spring Data module that supports the repository mechanism.
Each Spring Data module includes a repositories element that allows you to simply define a base package that Spring scans for you.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans:beans xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa/spring-jpa.xsd"> <repositories base-package="com.acme.repositories" /> </beans:beans>
In the preceding example, Spring is instructed to scan
com.acme.repositories and all its subpackages for
interfaces extending Repository
or one
of its subinterfaces. For each interface found, the infrastructure
registers the persistence technology-specific
FactoryBean
to create the appropriate
proxies that handle invocations of the query methods. Each bean is
registered under a bean name that is derived from the interface name,
so an interface of UserRepository
would
be registered under userRepository
. The
base-package
attribute allows wildcards, so that you can
have a pattern of scanned packages.
By default the infrastructure picks up every interface
extending the persistence technology-specific
Repository
subinterface located under
the configured base package and creates a bean instance for it.
However, you might want more fine-grained control over which
interfaces bean instances get created for. To do this you use
<include-filter />
and <exclude-filter
/>
elements inside <repositories />
.
The semantics are exactly equivalent to the elements in Spring's
context namespace. For details, see Spring reference documentation on these
elements.
For example, to exclude certain interfaces from instantiation as repository, you could use the following configuration:
Example 1.6. Using exclude-filter element
<repositories base-package="com.acme.repositories"> <context:exclude-filter type="regex" expression=".*SomeRepository" /> </repositories>
This example excludes all interfaces ending in
SomeRepository
from being
instantiated.
The repository infrastructure can also be triggered using a
store-specific
@Enable${store}Repositories
annotation
on a JavaConfig class. For an introduction into Java-based
configuration of the Spring container, see the reference
documentation.[1]
A sample configuration to enable Spring Data repositories looks something like this.
Example 1.7. Sample annotation based repository configuration
@Configuration @EnableJpaRepositories("com.acme.repositories") class ApplicationConfiguration { @Bean public EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory() { // … } }
Note | |
---|---|
The sample uses the JPA-specific annotation, which you would
change according to the store module you actually use. The same
applies to the definition of the
|
You can also use the repository infrastructure outside of a
Spring container. You still need some Spring libraries in your
classpath, but generally you can set up repositories programmatically
as well. The Spring Data modules that provide repository support ship
a persistence technology-specific
RepositoryFactory
that you can use as
follows.
Example 1.8. Standalone usage of repository factory
RepositoryFactorySupport factory = … // Instantiate factory here UserRepository repository = factory.getRepository(UserRepository.class);
Often it is necessary to provide a custom implementation for a few repository methods. Spring Data repositories easily allow you to provide custom repository code and integrate it with generic CRUD abstraction and query method functionality.
To enrich a repository with custom functionality you first define an interface and an implementation for the custom functionality. Use the repository interface you provided to extend the custom interface.
Example 1.9. Interface for custom repository functionality
interface UserRepositoryCustom { public void someCustomMethod(User user); }
Example 1.10. Implementation of custom repository functionality
class UserRepositoryImpl implements UserRepositoryCustom { public void someCustomMethod(User user) { // Your custom implementation } }
Note | |
---|---|
The implementation itself does not depend on Spring Data and can be a regular Spring bean. So you can use standard dependency injection behavior to inject references to other beans, take part in aspects, and so on. |
Example 1.11. Changes to the your basic repository interface
public interface UserRepository extends CrudRepository<User, Long>, UserRepositoryCustom { // Declare query methods here }
Let your standard repository interface extend the custom one. Doing so makes CRUD and custom functionality available to clients.
If you use namespace configuration, the repository
infrastructure tries to autodetect custom implementations by scanning
for classes below the package we found a repository in. These classes
need to follow the naming convention of appending the namespace
element's attribute repository-impl-postfix
to the found
repository interface name. This postfix defaults to
Impl
.
Example 1.12. Configuration example
<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" /> <repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" repository-impl-postfix="FooBar" />
The first configuration example will try to look up a class
com.acme.repository.UserRepositoryImpl
to act
as custom repository implementation, where the second example will try
to lookup
com.acme.repository.UserRepositoryFooBar
.
The preceding approach works well if your custom implementation uses annotation-based configuration and autowiring only, as it will be treated as any other Spring bean. If your custom implementation bean needs special wiring, you simply declare the bean and name it after the conventions just described. The infrastructure will then refer to the manually defined bean definition by name instead of creating one itself.
Example 1.13. Manual wiring of custom implementations (I)
<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" /> <beans:bean id="userRepositoryImpl" class="…"> <!-- further configuration --> </beans:bean>
The preceding approach is not feasible when you want to add a single method to all your repository interfaces.
To add custom behavior to all repositories, you first add an intermediate interface to declare the shared behavior.
Example 1.14. An interface declaring custom shared behavior
public interface MyRepository<T, ID extends Serializable> extends JpaRepository<T, ID> { void sharedCustomMethod(ID id); }
Now your individual repository interfaces will extend this
intermediate interface instead of the
Repository
interface to include the
functionality declared.
Next, create an implementation of the intermediate interface that extends the persistence technology-specific repository base class. This class will then act as a custom base class for the repository proxies.
Example 1.15. Custom repository base class
public class MyRepositoryImpl<T, ID extends Serializable> extends SimpleJpaRepository<T, ID> implements MyRepository<T, ID> { private EntityManager entityManager; // There are two constructors to choose from, either can be used. public MyRepositoryImpl(Class<T> domainClass, EntityManager entityManager) { super(domainClass, entityManager); // This is the recommended method for accessing inherited class dependencies. this.entityManager = entityManager; } public void sharedCustomMethod(ID id) { // implementation goes here } }
The default behavior of the Spring <repositories
/>
namespace is to provide an implementation for all
interfaces that fall under the base-package
. This means
that if left in its current state, an implementation instance of
MyRepository
will be created by
Spring. This is of course not desired as it is just supposed to act
as an intermediary between Repository
and the actual repository interfaces you want to define for each
entity. To exclude an interface that extends
Repository
from being instantiated as
a repository instance, you can either annotate it with
@NoRepositoryBean
or move it outside
of the configured base-package
.
Then create a custom repository factory to replace the default
RepositoryFactoryBean
that will in turn
produce a custom RepositoryFactory
. The new
repository factory will then provide your
MyRepositoryImpl
as the implementation of any
interfaces that extend the Repository
interface, replacing the SimpleJpaRepository
implementation you just extended.
Example 1.16. Custom repository factory bean
public class MyRepositoryFactoryBean<R extends JpaRepository<T, I>, T, I extends Serializable> extends JpaRepositoryFactoryBean<R, T, I> { protected RepositoryFactorySupport createRepositoryFactory(EntityManager entityManager) { return new MyRepositoryFactory(entityManager); } private static class MyRepositoryFactory<T, I extends Serializable> extends JpaRepositoryFactory { private EntityManager entityManager; public MyRepositoryFactory(EntityManager entityManager) { super(entityManager); this.entityManager = entityManager; } protected Object getTargetRepository(RepositoryMetadata metadata) { return new MyRepositoryImpl<T, I>((Class<T>) metadata.getDomainClass(), entityManager); } protected Class<?> getRepositoryBaseClass(RepositoryMetadata metadata) { // The RepositoryMetadata can be safely ignored, it is used by the JpaRepositoryFactory //to check for QueryDslJpaRepository's which is out of scope. return MyRepository.class; } } }
Finally, either declare beans of the custom factory directly
or use the factory-class
attribute of the Spring
namespace to tell the repository infrastructure to use your custom
factory implementation.
Example 1.17. Using the custom factory with the namespace
<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" factory-class="com.acme.MyRepositoryFactoryBean" />
This section documents a set of Spring Data extensions that enable Spring Data usage in a variety of contexts. Currently most of the integration is targeted towards Spring MVC.
Given you are developing a Spring MVC web application you typically have to resolve domain class ids from URLs. By default your task is to transform that request parameter or URL part into the domain class to hand it to layers below then or execute business logic on the entities directly. This would look something like this:
@Controller @RequestMapping("/users") public class UserController { private final UserRepository userRepository; @Autowired public UserController(UserRepository userRepository) { Assert.notNull(repository, "Repository must not be null!"); userRepository = userRepository; } @RequestMapping("/{id}") public String showUserForm(@PathVariable("id") Long id, Model model) { // Do null check for id User user = userRepository.findOne(id); // Do null check for user model.addAttribute("user", user); return "user"; } }
First you declare a repository dependency for each controller to
look up the entity managed by the controller or repository respectively.
Looking up the entity is boilerplate as well, as it's always a
findOne(…)
call. Fortunately Spring provides
means to register custom components that allow conversion between a
String
value to an arbitrary type.
For Spring versions before 3.0 simple Java
PropertyEditor
s had to be used. To
integrate with that, Spring Data offers a
DomainClassPropertyEditorRegistrar
, which looks
up all Spring Data repositories registered in the
ApplicationContext
and registers a
custom PropertyEditor
for the managed
domain class.
<bean class="….web.servlet.mvc.annotation.AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter"> <property name="webBindingInitializer"> <bean class="….web.bind.support.ConfigurableWebBindingInitializer"> <property name="propertyEditorRegistrars"> <bean class="org.springframework.data.repository.support.DomainClassPropertyEditorRegistrar" /> </property> </bean> </property> </bean>
If you have configured Spring MVC as in the preceding example, you can configure your controller as follows, which reduces a lot of the clutter and boilerplate.
@Controller @RequestMapping("/users") public class UserController { @RequestMapping("/{id}") public String showUserForm(@PathVariable("id") User user, Model model) { model.addAttribute("user", user); return "userForm"; } }
In Spring 3.0 and later the
PropertyEditor
support is superseded by
a new conversion infrastructure that eliminates the drawbacks of
PropertyEditor
s and uses a stateless X
to Y conversion approach. Spring Data now ships with a
DomainClassConverter
that mimics the behavior
of DomainClassPropertyEditorRegistrar
. To
configure, simply declare a bean instance and pipe the
ConversionService
being used into its
constructor:
<mvc:annotation-driven conversion-service="conversionService" /> <bean class="org.springframework.data.repository.support.DomainClassConverter"> <constructor-arg ref="conversionService" /> </bean>
If you are using JavaConfig, you can simply extend Spring MVC's
WebMvcConfigurationSupport
and hand the
FormatingConversionService
that the
configuration superclass provides into the
DomainClassConverter
instance you
create.
class WebConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurationSupport { // Other configuration omitted @Bean public DomainClassConverter<?> domainClassConverter() { return new DomainClassConverter<FormattingConversionService>(mvcConversionService()); } }
When working with pagination in the web layer you usually have to
write a lot of boilerplate code yourself to extract the necessary
metadata from the request. The less desirable approach shown in the
example below requires the method to contain an
HttpServletRequest
parameter that has to
be parsed manually. This example also omits appropriate failure
handling, which would make the code even more verbose.
@Controller @RequestMapping("/users") public class UserController { // DI code omitted @RequestMapping public String showUsers(Model model, HttpServletRequest request) { int page = Integer.parseInt(request.getParameter("page")); int pageSize = Integer.parseInt(request.getParameter("pageSize")); Pageable pageable = new PageRequest(page, pageSize); model.addAttribute("users", userService.getUsers(pageable)); return "users"; } }
The bottom line is that the controller should not have to handle
the functionality of extracting pagination information from the request.
So Spring includes a PageableArgumentResolver
that will do the work for you.
<bean class="….web.servlet.mvc.annotation.AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter"> <property name="customArgumentResolvers"> <list> <bean class="org.springframework.data.web.PageableArgumentResolver" /> </list> </property> </bean>
This configuration allows you to simplify controllers down to something like this:
@Controller @RequestMapping("/users") public class UserController { @RequestMapping public String showUsers(Model model, Pageable pageable) { model.addAttribute("users", userRepository.findAll(pageable)); return "users"; } }
The PageableArgumentResolver
automatically
resolves request parameters to build a
PageRequest
instance. By default it expects the
following structure for the request parameters.
Table 1.1. Request parameters evaluated by
PageableArgumentResolver
page | Page you want to retrieve. |
page.size | Size of the page you want to retrieve. |
page.sort | Property that should be sorted by. |
page.sort.dir | Direction that should be used for sorting. |
In case you need multiple Pageable
s
to be resolved from the request (for multiple tables, for example) you
can use Spring's @Qualifier
annotation to
distinguish one from another. The request parameters then have to be
prefixed with ${qualifier}_
. So for a method signature like
this:
public String showUsers(Model model, @Qualifier("foo") Pageable first, @Qualifier("bar") Pageable second) { … }
you have to populate foo_page
and
bar_page
and the related subproperties.
The PageableArgumentResolver
will use a
PageRequest
with the first page and a page size
of 10 by default. It will use that value if it cannot resolve a
PageRequest
from the request (because of
missing parameters, for example). You can configure a global default
on the bean declaration directly. If you might need controller method
specific defaults for the Pageable
,
annotate the method parameter with
@PageableDefaults
and specify page
(through pageNumber
), page size (through
value
), sort
(list of properties to sort
by), and sortDir
(the direction to sort by) as annotation
attributes:
public String showUsers(Model model, @PageableDefaults(pageNumber = 0, value = 30) Pageable pageable) { … }
If you work with the Spring JDBC module, you probably are familiar
with the support to populate a DataSource
using SQL scripts. A similar abstraction is available on the
repositories level, although it does not use SQL as the data definition
language because it must be store-independent. Thus the populators
support XML (through Spring's OXM abstraction) and JSON (through
Jackson) to define data with which to populate the repositories.
Assume you have a file data.json
with the
following content:
Example 1.18. Data defined in JSON
[ { "_class" : "com.acme.Person", "firstname" : "Dave", "lastname" : "Matthews" }, { "_class" : "com.acme.Person", "firstname" : "Carter", "lastname" : "Beauford" } ]
You can easily populate your repositories by using the populator
elements of the repository namespace provided in Spring Data Commons. To
populate the preceding data to your
PersonRepository
, do the
following:
Example 1.19. Declaring a Jackson repository populator
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:repository="http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/repository" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/repository http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/repository/spring-repository.xsd"> <repository:jackson-populator location="classpath:data.json" /> </beans>
This declaration causes the data.json
file
being read, deserialized by a Jackson
ObjectMapper
. The type to which the JSON object will be unmarshalled to will
be determined by inspecting the _class
attribute of the
JSON document. The infrastructure will eventually select the appropriate
repository to handle the object just deserialized.
To rather use XML to define the data the repositories shall be
populated with, you can use the unmarshaller-populator
element. You configure it to use one of the XML marshaller options
Spring OXM provides you with. See the Spring reference
documentation for details.
Example 1.20. Declaring an unmarshalling repository populator (using JAXB)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:repository="http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/repository" xmlns:oxm="http://www.springframework.org/schema/oxm" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/repository http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/repository/spring-repository.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/oxm http://www.springframework.org/schema/oxm/spring-oxm.xsd"> <repository:unmarshaller-populator location="classpath:data.json" unmarshaller-ref="unmarshaller" /> <oxm:jaxb2-marshaller contextPath="com.acme" /> </beans>
[1] JavaConfig in the Spring reference documentation - http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.1.x/spring-framework-reference/html/beans.html#beans-java
Abstract
This chapter includes details of the JPA repository implementation.
The JPA module of Spring Data contains a custom namespace that
allows defining repository beans. It also contains certain features and
element attributes that are special to JPA. Generally the JPA
repositories can be set up using the repositories
element:
Example 2.1. Setting up JPA repositories using the namespace
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jpa="http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa http://www.springframework.org/schema/data/jpa/spring-jpa.xsd"> <jpa:repositories base-package="com.acme.repositories" /> </beans>
Using this element looks up Spring Data repositories as described
in Section 1.2.3, “Creating repository instances”. Beyond that it
activates persistence exception translation for all beans annotated with
@Repository
to let exceptions being
thrown by the JPA presistence providers be converted into Spring's
DataAccessException
hierarchy.
Beyond the default attributes of the repositories
element the JPA namespace offers additional attributes to gain more
detailled control over the setup of the repositories:
Table 2.1. Custom JPA-specific attributes of the repositories element
entity-manager-factory-ref | Explicitly wire the
EntityManagerFactory to be used
with the repositories being detected by the
repositories element. Usually used if multiple
EntityManagerFactory beans are
used within the application. If not configured we will
automatically lookup the single
EntityManagerFactory configured
in the
ApplicationContext . |
transaction-manager-ref | Explicitly wire the
PlatformTransactionManager to
be used with the repositories being detected by the
repositories element. Usually only necessary if
multiple transaction managers and/or
EntityManagerFactory beans have
been configured. Default to a single defined
PlatformTransactionManager
inside the current
ApplicationContext . |
The Spring Data JPA repositories support cannot only be activated through an XML namespace but also using an annotation through JavaConfig.
Example 2.2. Spring Data JPA repositories using JavaConfig
@Configuration @EnableJpaRepositories @EnableTransactionManagement class ApplicationConfig { @Bean public DataSource dataSource() { EmbeddedDatabaseBuilder builder = new EmbeddedDatabaseBuilder(); return builder.setType(EmbeddedDatabaseType.HSQL).build(); } @Bean public EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory() { HibernateJpaVendorAdapter vendorAdapter = new HibernateJpaVendorAdapter(); vendorAdapter.setGenerateDdl(true); LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean factory = new LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean(); factory.setJpaVendorAdapter(vendorAdapter); factory.setPackagesToScan("com.acme.domain"); factory.setDataSource(dataSource()); factory.afterPropertiesSet(); return factory.getObject(); } @Bean public PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager() { JpaTransactionManager txManager = new JpaTransactionManager(); txManager.setEntityManagerFactory(entityManagerFactory()); return txManager; } }
The just shown configuration class sets up an embedded HSQL
database using the EmbeddedDatabaseBuilder
API of
spring-jdbc. We then set up a
EntityManagerFactory
and use Hibernate as
sample persistence provider. The last infrastructure component declared
here is the JpaTransactionManager
. We eventually
activate Spring Data JPA repositories using the
@EnableJpaRepositories
annotation which
essentially carries the same attributes as the XML namespace does. If no
base package is configured it will use the one the configuration class
resides in.
Saving an entity can be performed via the
CrudRepository.save(…)
-Method. It will persist or merge the
given entity using the underlying JPA
EntityManager
. If the entity has not been
persisted yet Spring Data JPA will save the entity via a call to the
entityManager.persist(…)
-Method, otherwise the
entityManager.merge(…)
-Method will be called.
Spring Data JPA offers the following strategies to detect whether an entity is new or not:
Table 2.2. Options for detection whether an entity is new in Spring Data JPA
Id-Property inspection (default) | By default Spring Data JPA inspects the Id-Property of
the given Entity. If the Id-Property is null ,
then the entity will be assumed as new, otherwise as not
new. |
Implementing
Persistable | If an entity implements the
Persistable interface, Spring
Data JPA will delegate the new-detection to the
isNew - Method of the Entity. See the
JavaDoc
for details. |
Implementing
EntityInformation | One can customize the
EntityInformation abstraction
used in the SimpleJpaRepository
implementation by creating a subclass of
JpaRepositoryFactory and overriding the
getEntityInformation -Method
accordingly. One then has to register the custom
implementation of JpaRepositoryFactory
as a Spring bean. Note that this should be rarely necessary.
See the JavaDoc
for details. |
The JPA module supports defining a query manually as String or have it being derived from the method name.
Although getting a query derived from the method name is quite
convenient, one might face the situation in which either the method
name parser does not support the keyword one wants to use or the
method name would get unnecessarily ugly. So you can either use JPA
named queries through a naming convention (see Section 2.3.3, “Using JPA NamedQueries” for more information) or
rather annotate your query method with
@Query
(see Section 2.3.4, “Using @Query” for details).
Generally the query creation mechanism for JPA works as described in Section 1.2, “Query methods”. Here's a short example of what a JPA query method translates into:
Example 2.3. Query creation from method names
public interface UserRepository extends Repository<User, Long> { List<User> findByEmailAddressAndLastname(String emailAddress, String lastname); }
We will create a query using the JPA criteria API from this but essentially this translates into the following query:
select u from User u where u.emailAddress = ?1 and u.lastname = ?2
Spring Data JPA will do a property check and traverse nested properties as described in ???. Here's an overview of the keywords supported for JPA and what a method containing that keyword essentially translates to.
Table 2.3. Supported keywords inside method names
Keyword | Sample | JPQL snippet |
---|---|---|
And | findByLastnameAndFirstname | … where x.lastname = ?1 and x.firstname =
?2 |
Or | findByLastnameOrFirstname | … where x.lastname = ?1 or x.firstname =
?2 |
Between | findByStartDateBetween | … where x.startDate between 1? and
?2 |
LessThan | findByAgeLessThan | … where x.age < ?1 |
GreaterThan | findByAgeGreaterThan | … where x.age > ?1 |
After | findByStartDateAfter | … where x.startDate > ?1 |
Before | findByStartDateBefore | … where x.startDate < ?1 |
IsNull | findByAgeIsNull | … where x.age is null |
IsNotNull,NotNull | findByAge(Is)NotNull | … where x.age not null |
Like | findByFirstnameLike | … where x.firstname like ?1 |
NotLike | findByFirstnameNotLike | … where x.firstname not like ?1 |
StartingWith | findByFirstnameStartingWith | … where x.firstname like ?1 (parameter
bound with appended % ) |
EndingWith | findByFirstnameEndingWith | … where x.firstname like ?1 (parameter
bound with prepended % ) |
Containing | findByFirstnameContaining | … where x.firstname like ?1 (parameter
bound wrapped in % ) |
OrderBy | findByAgeOrderByLastnameDesc | … where x.age = ?1 order by x.lastname
desc |
Not | findByLastnameNot | … where x.lastname <> ?1 |
In | findByAgeIn(Collection<Age>
ages) | … where x.age in ?1 |
NotIn | findByAgeNotIn(Collection<Age>
age) | … where x.age not in ?1 |
True | findByActiveTrue() | … where x.active = true |
False | findByActiveFalse() | … where x.active = false |
Note | |
---|---|
|
Note | |
---|---|
The examples use simple |
To use XML configuration simply add the necessary
<named-query />
element to the
orm.xml
JPA configuration file located in
META-INF
folder of your classpath. Automatic
invocation of named queries is enabled by using some defined naming
convention. For more details see below.
Example 2.4. XML named query configuration
<named-query name="User.findByLastname"> <query>select u from User u where u.lastname = ?1</query> </named-query>
As you can see the query has a special name which will be used to resolve it at runtime.
Annotation configuration has the advantage of not needing another configuration file to be edited, probably lowering maintenance costs. You pay for that benefit by the need to recompile your domain class for every new query declaration.
Example 2.5. Annotation based named query configuration
@Entity @NamedQuery(name = "User.findByEmailAddress", query = "select u from User u where u.emailAddress = ?1") public class User { }
To allow execution of these named queries all you need to do is
to specify the UserRepository
as
follows:
Example 2.6. Query method declaration in UserRepository
public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { List<User> findByLastname(String lastname); User findByEmailAddress(String emailAddress); }
Spring Data will try to resolve a call to these methods to a named query, starting with the simple name of the configured domain class, followed by the method name separated by a dot. So the example here would use the named queries defined above instead of trying to create a query from the method name.
Using named queries to declare queries for entities is a valid
approach and works fine for a small number of queries. As the queries
themselves are tied to the Java method that executes them you actually
can bind them directly using the Spring Data JPA @Query
annotation rather than annotating them to the domain class. This will
free the domain class from persistence specific information and
co-locate the query to the repository interface.
Queries annotated to the query method will take precedence over
queries defined using @NamedQuery
or named queries declared
in orm.xml
.
Example 2.7. Declare query at the query method using
@Query
public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { @Query("select u from User u where u.emailAddress = ?1") User findByEmailAddress(String emailAddress); }
The query execution mechanism for manually defined queries using
@Query
allow the definition of advanced
LIKE
expressions inside the query definition.
Example 2.8. Advanced LIKE
expressions in
@Query
public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { @Query("select u from User u where u.firstname like %?1") List<User> findByFirstnameEndsWith(String firstname); }
In the just shown sample LIKE
delimiter character
%
is recognized and the query transformed into a valid
JPQL query (removing the %
). Upon query execution the
parameter handed into the method call gets augmented with the
previously recognized LIKE
pattern.
The @Query
annotation allows to
execute native queries by setting the nativeQuery
flag to
true. Note, that we currently don't support execution of pagination or
dynamic sorting for native queries as we'd have to manipulate the
actual query declared and we cannot do this reliably for native
SQL.
Example 2.9. Declare a native query at the query method using
@Query
public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { @Query(value = "SELECT FROM USERS WHERE EMAIL_ADDRESS = ?0", nativeQuery = true) User findByEmailAddress(String emailAddress); }
By default Spring Data JPA will use position based parameter
binding as described in all the samples above. This makes query methods
a little error prone to refactoring regarding the parameter position. To
solve this issue you can use @Param
annotation to give a
method parameter a concrete name and bind the name in the query:
Example 2.10. Using named parameters
public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { @Query("select u from User u where u.firstname = :firstname or u.lastname = :lastname") User findByLastnameOrFirstname(@Param("lastname") String lastname, @Param("firstname") String firstname); }
Note that the method parameters are switched according to the occurrence in the query defined.
All the sections above describe how to declare queries to access a
given entity or collection of entities. Of course you can add custom
modifying behaviour by using facilities described in Section 1.3, “Custom implementations for Spring Data repositories”. As this approach is
feasible for comprehensive custom functionality, you can achieve the
execution of modifying queries that actually only need parameter binding
by annotating the query method with @Modifying
:
Example 2.11. Declaring manipulating queries
@Modifying @Query("update User u set u.firstname = ?1 where u.lastname = ?2") int setFixedFirstnameFor(String firstname, String lastname);
This will trigger the query annotated to the method as updating
query instead of a selecting one. As the
EntityManager
might contain outdated
entities after the execution of the modifying query, we automatically
clear it (see JavaDoc of
EntityManager
.clear()
for details). This will effectively drop all non-flushed changes still
pending in the EntityManager
. If you
don't wish the EntityManager
to be
cleared automatically you can set
@Modifying
annotation's
clearAutomatically
attribute to
false
;
To apply JPA QueryHint
s to the
queries declared in your repository interface you can use the
QueryHints
annotation. It takes an array
of JPA QueryHint
annotations plus a
boolean flag to potentially disable the hints applied to the addtional
count query triggered when applying pagination.
Example 2.12. Using QueryHints with a repository method
public interface UserRepository extends Repository<User, Long> { @QueryHints(value = { @QueryHint(name = "name", value = "value")}, forCounting = false) Page<User> findByLastname(String lastname, Pageable pageable); }
The just shown declaration would apply the configured
QueryHint
for that actually query but
omit applying it to the count query triggered to calculate the total
number of pages.
JPA 2 introduces a criteria API that can be used to build queries
programmatically. Writing a criteria
you actually define the
where-clause of a query for a domain class. Taking another step back these
criteria can be regarded as predicate over the entity that is described by
the JPA criteria API constraints.
Spring Data JPA takes the concept of a specification from Eric
Evans' book "Domain Driven Design", following the same semantics and
providing an API to define such
Specification
s using the JPA criteria API.
To support specifications you can extend your repository interface with
the JpaSpecificationExecutor
interface:
public interface CustomerRepository extends CrudRepository<Customer, Long>, JpaSpecificationExecutor { … }
The additional interface carries methods that allow you to execute
Specification
s in a variety of ways.
For example, the findAll
method will return all
entities that match the specification:
List<T> findAll(Specification<T> spec);
The Specification
interface is as
follows:
public interface Specification<T> { Predicate toPredicate(Root<T> root, CriteriaQuery<?> query, CriteriaBuilder builder); }
Okay, so what is the typical use case?
Specification
s can easily be used to build
an extensible set of predicates on top of an entity that then can be
combined and used with JpaRepository
without the need to declare a query (method) for every needed combination.
Here's an example:
Example 2.13. Specifications for a Customer
public class CustomerSpecs { public static Specification<Customer> isLongTermCustomer() { return new Specification<Customer>() { public Predicate toPredicate(Root<Customer> root, CriteriaQuery<?> query, CriteriaBuilder builder) { LocalDate date = new LocalDate().minusYears(2); return builder.lessThan(root.get(Customer_.createdAt), date); } }; } public static Specification<Customer> hasSalesOfMoreThan(MontaryAmount value) { return new Specification<Customer>() { public Predicate toPredicate(Root<T> root, CriteriaQuery<?> query, CriteriaBuilder builder) { // build query here } }; } }
Admittedly the amount of boilerplate leaves room for improvement
(that will hopefully be reduced by Java 8 closures) but the client side
becomes much nicer as you will see below. The
Customer_
type is a metamodel type generated using
the JPA Metamodel generator (see the Hibernate
implementation's documentation for example). So the expression
Customer_.createdAt
is asuming the
Customer
having a createdAt
attribute
of type Date
. Besides that we have expressed some
criteria on a business requirement abstraction level and created
executable Specification
s. So a client
might use a Specification
as
follows:
Example 2.14. Using a simple Specification
List<Customer> customers = customerRepository.findAll(isLongTermCustomer());
Okay, why not simply create a query for this kind of data access?
You're right. Using a single Specification
does not gain a lot of benefit over a plain query declaration. The power
of Specification
s really shines when you
combine them to create new Specification
objects. You can achieve this through the
Specifications
helper class we provide to build
expressions like this:
Example 2.15. Combined Specifications
MonetaryAmount amount = new MonetaryAmount(200.0, Currencies.DOLLAR); List<Customer> customers = customerRepository.findAll( where(isLongTermCustomer()).or(hasSalesOfMoreThan(amount)));
As
you can see, Specifications
offers some glue-code
methods to chain and combine
Specification
s. Thus extending your data
access layer is just a matter of creating new
Specification
implementations and
combining them with ones already existing.
CRUD methods on repository instances are transactional by default.
For reading operations the transaction configuration readOnly
flag is set to true, all others are configured with a plain
@Transactional
so that default transaction
configuration applies. For details see JavaDoc of
Repository
. If you need to tweak transaction
configuration for one of the methods declared in
Repository
simply redeclare the method in
your repository interface as follows:
Example 2.16. Custom transaction configuration for CRUD
public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { @Override @Transactional(timeout = 10) public List<User> findAll(); // Further query method declarations }
This will cause the findAll()
method to
be executed with a timeout of 10 seconds and without the
readOnly
flag.
Another possibility to alter transactional behaviour is using a facade or service implementation that typically covers more than one repository. Its purpose is to define transactional boundaries for non-CRUD operations:
Example 2.17. Using a facade to define transactions for multiple repository calls
@Service class UserManagementImpl implements UserManagement { private final UserRepository userRepository; private final RoleRepository roleRepository; @Autowired public UserManagementImpl(UserRepository userRepository, RoleRepository roleRepository) { this.userRepository = userRepository; this.roleRepository = roleRepository; } @Transactional public void addRoleToAllUsers(String roleName) { Role role = roleRepository.findByName(roleName); for (User user : userRepository.findAll()) { user.addRole(role); userRepository.save(user); } }
This will cause call to
addRoleToAllUsers(…)
to run inside a
transaction (participating in an existing one or create a new one if
none already running). The transaction configuration at the repositories
will be neglected then as the outer transaction configuration determines
the actual one used. Note that you will have to activate
<tx:annotation-driven />
explicitly to get annotation
based configuration at facades working. The example above assumes you
are using component scanning.
To allow your query methods to be transactional simply use
@Transactional
at the repository
interface you define.
Example 2.18. Using @Transactional at query methods
@Transactional(readOnly = true) public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> { List<User> findByLastname(String lastname); @Modifying @Transactional @Query("delete from User u where u.active = false") void deleteInactiveUsers(); }
Typically you will want the readOnly
flag set to
true as most of the query methods will only read data. In contrast to
that deleteInactiveUsers()
makes use of the
@Modifying
annotation and overrides the
transaction configuration. Thus the method will be executed with
readOnly
flag set to false.
Note | |
---|---|
It's definitely reasonable to use transactions for read only
queries and we can mark them as such by setting the
|
To specify the lock mode to be used the
@Lock
annotation can be used on query
methods:
Example 2.19. Defining lock metadata on query methods
interface UserRepository extends Repository<User, Long> { // Plain query method @Lock(LockModeType.READ) List<User> findByLastname(String lastname); }
This method declaration will cause the query being triggered to be
equipped with the LockModeType
READ
. You can also define locking for CRUD methods by
redeclaring them in your repository interface and adding the
@Lock
annotation:
Example 2.20. Defining lock metadata on CRUD methods
interface UserRepository extends Repository<User, Long> { // Redeclaration of a CRUD method @Lock(LockModeType.READ); List<User> findAll(); }
Spring Data provides sophisticated support to transparently keep track of who created or changed an entity and the point in time this happened. To benefit from that functionality you have to equip your entity classes with auditing metadata that can be defined either using annotations or by implementing an interface.
We provide @CreatedBy
,
@LastModifiedBy
to capture the user who
created or modified the entity as well as
@CreatedDate
and
@LastModifiedDate
to capture the point in
time this happened.
Example 2.21. An audited entity
class Customer { @CreatedBy private User user; @CreatedDate private DateTime createdDate; // … further properties omitted }
As you can see, the annotations can be applied selectively,
depending on which information you'd like to capture. For the annotations
capturing the points in time can be used on properties of type
org.joda.time.DateTime
,
java.util.Date
as well as
long
/Long
.
In case you don't want to use annotations to define auditing
metadata you can let your domain class implement the
Auditable
interface. It exposes setter
methods for all of the auditing properties.
There's also a convenience base class
AbstractAuditable
which you can extend to
avoid the need to manually implement the interface methods. Be aware that
this increases the coupling of your domain classes to Spring Data which
might be something you want to avoid. Usually the annotation based way of
defining auditing metadata is preferred as it is less invasive and more
flexible.
In case you use either @CreatedBy
or
@LastModifiedBy
, the auditing
infrastructure somehow needs to become aware of the current principal. To
do so, we provide an AuditorAware<T>
SPI interface that you have to implement to tell the infrastructure who
the current user or system interacting with the application is. The
generic type T
defines of what type the properties annotated
with @CreatedBy
or
@LastModifiedBy
have to be.
Here's an example implementation of the interface using Spring
Security's Authentication
object:
Example 2.22. Implementation of AuditorAware based on Spring Security
class SpringSecurityAuditorAware implements AuditorAware<User> { public User getCurrentAuditor() { Authentication authentication = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication(); if (authentication == null || !authentication.isAuthenticated()) { return null; } return ((MyUserDetails) authentication.getPrincipal()).getUser(); } }
The implementation is accessing the
Authentication
object provided by Spring
Security and looks up the custom
UserDetails
instance from it that you have
created in your UserDetailsService
implementation. We're assuming here that you are exposing the domain user
through that UserDetails
implementation but
you could also look it up from anywhere based on the
Authentication
found.
Spring Data JPA ships with an entity listener that can be used to
trigger capturing auditing information. So first you have to register
the AuditingEntityListener
inside your
orm.xml
to be used for all entities in your
persistence contexts:
Note that the auditing feature requires spring-aspects.jar
to be on the classpath.
Example 2.23. Auditing configuration orm.xml
<persistence-unit-metadata> <persistence-unit-defaults> <entity-listeners> <entity-listener class="….data.jpa.domain.support.AuditingEntityListener" /> </entity-listeners> </persistence-unit-defaults> </persistence-unit-metadata>
Now activating auditing functionality is just a matter of adding
the Spring Data JPA auditing
namespace element to
your configuration:
Example 2.24. Activating auditing in the Spring configuration
<jpa:auditing auditor-aware-ref="yourAuditorAwareBean" />
As you can see you have to provide a bean that implements the
AuditorAware
interface which looks as
follows:
Example 2.25. AuditorAware
interface
public interface AuditorAware<T, ID extends Serializable> { T getCurrentAuditor(); }
Usually you will have some kind of authentication component in
your application that tracks the user currently working with the system.
This component should be AuditorAware
and
thus allow seamless tracking of the auditor.
Spring supports having multiple persistence units out of the box.
Sometimes, however, you might want to modularize your application but
still make sure that all these modules run inside a single persistence
unit at runtime. To do so Spring Data JPA offers a
PersistenceUnitManager
implementation that automatically
merges persistence units based on their name.
Example 2.26. Using MergingPersistenceUnitmanager
<bean class="….LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean"> <property name="persistenceUnitManager"> <bean class="….MergingPersistenceUnitManager" /> </property </bean>
A plain JPA setup requires all annotation mapped entity classes
listed in orm.xml
. Same applies to XML mapping
files. Spring Data JPA provides a
ClasspathScanningPersistenceUnitPostProcessor
that gets a base package configured and optionally takes a mapping
filename pattern. It will then scan the given package for classes
annotated with @Entity
or
@MappedSuperclass
and also loads the
configuration files matching the filename pattern and hands them to the
JPA configuration. The PostProcessor has to be configured like
this
Example 2.27. Using ClasspathScanningPersistenceUnitPostProcessor
<bean class="….LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean"> <property name="persistenceUnitPostProcessors"> <list> <bean class="org.springframework.data.jpa.support.ClasspathScanningPersistenceUnitPostProcessor"> <constructor-arg value="com.acme.domain" /> <property name="mappingFileNamePattern" value="**/*Mapping.xml" /> </bean> </list> </property> </bean>
Note | |
---|---|
As of Spring 3.1 a package to scan can be configured on the
|
Instances of the repository interfaces are usually created by a container, which Spring is the most natural choice when working with Spring Data. There's sophisticated support to easily set up Spring to create bean instances documented in Section 1.2.3, “Creating repository instances”. As of version 1.1.0 Spring Data JPA ships with a custom CDI extension that allows using the repository abstraction in CDI environments. The extension is part of the JAR so all you need to do to activate it is dropping the Spring Data JPA JAR into your classpath.
You can now set up the infrastructure by implementing a CDI
Producer
for the
EntityManagerFactory
:
class EntityManagerFactoryProducer { @Produces @ApplicationScoped public EntityManagerFactory createEntityManagerFactory() { return Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("my-presistence-unit"); } public void close(@Disposes EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory) { entityManagerFactory.close(); } }
The Spring Data JPA CDI extension will pick up all
EntityManager
s availables as CDI beans
and create a proxy for a Spring Data repository whenever an bean of a
repository type is requested by the container. Thus obtaining an
instance of a Spring Data repository is a matter of declaring an
@Inject
ed property:
class RepositoryClient { @Inject PersonRepository repository; public void businessMethod() { List<Person> people = repository.findAll(); } }
The <repositories />
element triggers the setup
of the Spring Data repository infrastructure. The most important attribute
is base-package
which defines the package to scan for Spring
Data repository interfaces.[2]
Table A.1. Attributes
Name | Description |
---|---|
base-package | Defines the package to be used to be scanned for repository
interfaces extending *Repository
(actual interface is determined by specific Spring Data module) in
auto detection mode. All packages below the configured package
will be scanned, too. Wildcards are allowed. |
repository-impl-postfix | Defines the postfix to autodetect custom repository
implementations. Classes whose names end with the configured
postfix will be considered as candidates. Defaults to
Impl . |
query-lookup-strategy | Determines the strategy to be used to create finder
queries. See the section called “Query lookup strategies” for
details. Defaults to create-if-not-found . |
The following table lists the keywords generally supported by the Spring Data repository query derivation mechanism. However, consult the store-specific documentation for the exact list of supported keywords, because some listed here might not be supported in a particular store.
Table B.1. Query keywords
Logical keyword | Keyword expressions |
---|---|
AND | And |
OR | Or |
AFTER | After ,
IsAfter |
BEFORE | Before ,
IsBefore |
CONTAINING | Containing ,
IsContaining ,
Contains |
BETWEEN | Between ,
IsBetween |
ENDING_WITH | EndingWith ,
IsEndingWith ,
EndsWith |
EXISTS | Exists |
FALSE | False ,
IsFalse |
GREATER_THAN | GreaterThan ,
IsGreaterThan |
GREATER_THAN_EQUALS | GreaterThanEqual ,
IsGreaterThanEqual |
IN | In , IsIn |
IS | Is , Equals , (or no
keyword) |
IS_NOT_NULL | NotNull ,
IsNotNull |
IS_NULL | Null , IsNull |
LESS_THAN | LessThan ,
IsLessThan |
LESS_THAN_EQUAL | LessThanEqual ,
IsLessThanEqual |
LIKE | Like , IsLike |
NEAR | Near , IsNear |
NOT | Not , IsNot |
NOT_IN | NotIn ,
IsNotIn |
NOT_LIKE | NotLike ,
IsNotLike |
REGEX | Regex , MatchesRegex ,
Matches |
STARTING_WITH | StartingWith ,
IsStartingWith ,
StartsWith |
TRUE | True , IsTrue |
WITHIN | Within ,
IsWithin |
Aspect oriented programming
Commons DataBase Connection Pools - Library of the Apache
foundation offering pooling implementations of the
DataSource
interface.
Create, Read, Update, Delete - Basic persistence operations
Data Access Object - Pattern to separate persisting logic from the object to be persisted
Pattern to hand a component's dependency to the component from outside, freeing the component to lookup the dependant itself. For more information see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_Injection.
Object relational mapper implementing JPA - http://www.eclipselink.org
Object relational mapper implementing JPA - http://www.hibernate.org
Java Persistence Api
Java application framework - http://www.springframework.org