Spring features integration classes for remoting support using various technologies. The remoting support eases the development of remote-enabled services, implemented by your usual (Spring) POJOs. Currently, Spring supports the following remoting technologies:
Remote Method Invocation (RMI). Through
the use of the RmiProxyFactoryBean
and the
RmiServiceExporter
Spring supports both
traditional RMI (with java.rmi.Remote
interfaces and
java.rmi.RemoteException
) and
transparent remoting via RMI invokers (with any Java
interface).
Spring's HTTP invoker. Spring provides a
special remoting strategy which allows for Java serialization via
HTTP, supporting any Java interface (just like the RMI invoker). The
corresponding support classes are
HttpInvokerProxyFactoryBean
and
HttpInvokerServiceExporter
.
Hessian. By using Spring's
HessianProxyFactoryBean
and the
HessianServiceExporter
you can transparently
expose your services using the lightweight binary HTTP-based
protocol provided by Caucho.
Burlap. Burlap is Caucho's XML-based
alternative to Hessian. Spring provides support classes such as
BurlapProxyFactoryBean
and
BurlapServiceExporter
.
JAX-RPC. Spring provides remoting support for web services via JAX-RPC (J2EE 1.4's web service API).
JAX-WS. Spring provides remoting support for web services via JAX-WS (the successor of JAX-RPC, as introduced in Java EE 5 and Java 6).
JMS. Remoting using JMS as the underlying
protocol is supported via the
JmsInvokerServiceExporter
and
JmsInvokerProxyFactoryBean
classes.
While discussing the remoting capabilities of Spring, we'll use the following domain model and corresponding services:
public class Account implements Serializable{ private String name; public String getName(){ return name; } public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } }
public interface AccountService { public void insertAccount(Account account); public List<Account> getAccounts(String name); }
public interface RemoteAccountService extends Remote { public void insertAccount(Account account) throws RemoteException; public List<Account> getAccounts(String name) throws RemoteException; }
// the implementation doing nothing at the moment public class AccountServiceImpl implements AccountService { public void insertAccount(Account acc) { // do something... } public List<Account> getAccounts(String name) { // do something... } }
We will start exposing the service to a remote client by using RMI and talk a bit about the drawbacks of using RMI. We'll then continue to show an example using Hessian as the protocol.
Using Spring's support for RMI, you can transparently expose your services through the RMI infrastructure. After having this set up, you basically have a configuration similar to remote EJBs, except for the fact that there is no standard support for security context propagation or remote transaction propagation. Spring does provide hooks for such additional invocation context when using the RMI invoker, so you can for example plug in security frameworks or custom security credentials here.
Using the RmiServiceExporter
, we can expose
the interface of our AccountService object as RMI object. The interface
can be accessed by using RmiProxyFactoryBean
, or
via plain RMI in case of a traditional RMI service. The
RmiServiceExporter
explicitly supports the
exposing of any non-RMI services via RMI invokers.
Of course, we first have to set up our service in the Spring container:
<bean id="accountService" class="example.AccountServiceImpl"> <!-- any additional properties, maybe a DAO? --> </bean>
Next we'll have to expose our service using the
RmiServiceExporter
:
<bean class="org.springframework.remoting.rmi.RmiServiceExporter"> <!-- does not necessarily have to be the same name as the bean to be exported --> <property name="serviceName" value="AccountService"/> <property name="service" ref="accountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> <!-- defaults to 1099 --> <property name="registryPort" value="1199"/> </bean>
As you can see, we're overriding the port for the RMI registry.
Often, your application server also maintains an RMI registry and it is
wise to not interfere with that one. Furthermore, the service name is
used to bind the service under. So right now, the service will be bound
at 'rmi://HOST:1199/AccountService'
. We'll use the
URL later on to link in the service at the client side.
Note | |
---|---|
The |
Our client is a simple object using the
AccountService
to manage accounts:
public class SimpleObject { private AccountService accountService; public void setAccountService(AccountService accountService) { this.accountService = accountService; } // additional methods using the accountService }
To link in the service on the client, we'll create a separate Spring container, containing the simple object and the service linking configuration bits:
<bean class="example.SimpleObject"> <property name="accountService" ref="accountService"/> </bean> <bean id="accountService" class="org.springframework.remoting.rmi.RmiProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceUrl" value="rmi://HOST:1199/AccountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
That's all we need to do to support the remote account service on
the client. Spring will transparently create an invoker and remotely
enable the account service through the
RmiServiceExporter
. At the client we're linking
it in using the RmiProxyFactoryBean
.
Hessian offers a binary HTTP-based remoting protocol. It is developed by Caucho and more information about Hessian itself can be found at http://www.caucho.com.
Hessian communicates via HTTP and does so using a custom servlet.
Using Spring's DispatcherServlet
principles, as
known from Spring Web MVC usage, you can easily wire up such a servlet
exposing your services. First we'll have to create a new servlet in your
application (this is an excerpt from
'web.xml'
):
<servlet> <servlet-name>remoting</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>remoting</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/remoting/*</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
You're probably familiar with Spring's
DispatcherServlet
principles and if so, you know
that now you'll have to create a Spring container configuration resource
named 'remoting-servlet.xml'
(after the name of
your servlet) in the 'WEB-INF'
directory. The application context will be used in the next
section.
Alternatively, consider the use of Spring's simpler
HttpRequestHandlerServlet
. This allows you to
embed the remote exporter definitions in your root application context
(by default in 'WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml'
),
with individual servlet definitions pointing to specific exporter beans.
Each servlet name needs to match the bean name of its target exporter in
this case.
In the newly created application context called
remoting-servlet.xml
, we'll create a
HessianServiceExporter
exporting your
services:
<bean id="accountService" class="example.AccountServiceImpl"> <!-- any additional properties, maybe a DAO? --> </bean> <bean name="/AccountService" class="org.springframework.remoting.caucho.HessianServiceExporter"> <property name="service" ref="accountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
Now we're ready to link in the service at the client. No explicit
handler mapping is specified, mapping request URLs onto services, so
BeanNameUrlHandlerMapping
will be used: Hence,
the service will be exported at the URL indicated through its bean name
within the containing DispatcherServlet
's mapping
(as defined above):
'http://HOST:8080/remoting/AccountService'
.
Alternatively, create a
HessianServiceExporter
in your root application
context (e.g. in
'WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml'
):
<bean name="accountExporter" class="org.springframework.remoting.caucho.HessianServiceExporter"> <property name="service" ref="accountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
In the latter case, define a corresponding servlet for this
exporter in 'web.xml'
, with the same end result:
The exporter getting mapped to the request path
/remoting/AccountService
. Note that the servlet name
needs to match the bean name of the target exporter.
<servlet> <servlet-name>accountExporter</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.context.support.HttpRequestHandlerServlet</servlet-class> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>accountExporter</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/remoting/AccountService</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
Using the HessianProxyFactoryBean
we can
link in the service at the client. The same principles apply as with the
RMI example. We'll create a separate bean factory or application context
and mention the following beans where the
SimpleObject
is using the
AccountService
to manage accounts:
<bean class="example.SimpleObject"> <property name="accountService" ref="accountService"/> </bean> <bean id="accountService" class="org.springframework.remoting.caucho.HessianProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceUrl" value="http://remotehost:8080/remoting/AccountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
We won't discuss Burlap, the XML-based equivalent of Hessian, in
detail here, since it is configured and set up in exactly the same way
as the Hessian variant explained above. Just replace the word
Hessian
with Burlap
and you're all
set to go.
One of the advantages of Hessian and Burlap is that we can easily
apply HTTP basic authentication, because both protocols are HTTP-based.
Your normal HTTP server security mechanism can easily be applied through
using the web.xml
security features, for example.
Usually, you don't use per-user security credentials here, but rather
shared credentials defined at the
Hessian/BurlapProxyFactoryBean
level (similar to a
JDBC DataSource
).
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.BeanNameUrlHandlerMapping"> <property name="interceptors" ref="authorizationInterceptor"/> </bean> <bean id="authorizationInterceptor" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.UserRoleAuthorizationInterceptor"> <property name="authorizedRoles" value="administrator,operator"/> </bean>
This is an example where we explicitly mention the
BeanNameUrlHandlerMapping
and set an interceptor
allowing only administrators and operators to call the beans mentioned
in this application context.
Note | |
---|---|
Of course, this example doesn't show a flexible kind of security infrastructure. For more options as far as security is concerned, have a look at the Spring Security project at http://static.springsource.org/spring-security/site/. |
As opposed to Burlap and Hessian, which are both lightweight protocols using their own slim serialization mechanisms, Spring HTTP invokers use the standard Java serialization mechanism to expose services through HTTP. This has a huge advantage if your arguments and return types are complex types that cannot be serialized using the serialization mechanisms Hessian and Burlap use (refer to the next section for more considerations when choosing a remoting technology).
Under the hood, Spring uses either the standard facilities provided
by J2SE to perform HTTP calls or Commons
HttpClient
. Use the latter if you need more
advanced and easy-to-use functionality. Refer to jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient
for more info.
Setting up the HTTP invoker infrastructure for a service object
resembles closely the way you would do the same using Hessian or Burlap.
Just as Hessian support provides the
HessianServiceExporter
, Spring's HttpInvoker
support provides the
org.springframework.remoting.httpinvoker.HttpInvokerServiceExporter
.
To expose the AccountService
(mentioned above)
within a Spring Web MVC DispatcherServlet
, the
following configuration needs to be in place in the dispatcher's
application context:
<bean name="/AccountService" class="org.springframework.remoting.httpinvoker.HttpInvokerServiceExporter"> <property name="service" ref="accountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
Such an exporter definition will be exposed through the
DispatcherServlet
's standard mapping facilities,
as explained in the section on Hessian.
Alternatively, create an
HttpInvokerServiceExporter
in your root
application context (e.g. in
'WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml'
):
<bean name="accountExporter" class="org.springframework.remoting.httpinvoker.HttpInvokerServiceExporter"> <property name="service" ref="accountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
In addition, define a corresponding servlet for this exporter in
'web.xml'
, with the servlet name matching the bean
name of the target exporter:
<servlet> <servlet-name>accountExporter</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.context.support.HttpRequestHandlerServlet</servlet-class> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>accountExporter</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/remoting/AccountService</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
If you are running outside of a servlet container and are using
Sun's Java 6, then you can use the built-in HTTP server implementation.
You can configure the SimpleHttpServerFactoryBean
together with a
SimpleHttpInvokerServiceExporter
as is shown in this example:
<bean name="accountExporter" class="org.springframework.remoting.httpinvoker.SimpleHttpInvokerServiceExporter"> <property name="service" ref="accountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean> <bean id="httpServer" class="org.springframework.remoting.support.SimpleHttpServerFactoryBean"> <property name="contexts"> <util:map> <entry key="/remoting/AccountService" value-ref="accountExporter"/> </util:map> </property> <property name="port" value="8080" /> </bean>
Again, linking in the service from the client much resembles the way you would do it when using Hessian or Burlap. Using a proxy, Spring will be able to translate your calls to HTTP POST requests to the URL pointing to the exported service.
<bean id="httpInvokerProxy" class="org.springframework.remoting.httpinvoker.HttpInvokerProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceUrl" value="http://remotehost:8080/remoting/AccountService"/> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> </bean>
As mentioned before, you can choose what HTTP client you want to
use. By default, the HttpInvokerProxy
uses the
J2SE HTTP functionality, but you can also use the Commons
HttpClient
by setting the
httpInvokerRequestExecutor
property:
<property name="httpInvokerRequestExecutor"> <bean class="org.springframework.remoting.httpinvoker.CommonsHttpInvokerRequestExecutor"/> </property>
Spring provides full support for standard Java web services APIs:
Exposing web services using JAX-RPC
Accessing web services using JAX-RPC
Exposing web services using JAX-WS
Accessing web services using JAX-WS
Note | |
---|---|
Why two standard Java web services APIs? JAX-RPC 1.1 is the standard web service API in J2EE 1.4. As its name indicates, it focuses on on RPC bindings, which became less and less popular in the past couple of years. As a consequence, it has been superseded by JAX-WS 2.0 in Java EE 5, being more flexible in terms of bindings but also being heavily annotation-based. JAX-WS 2.1 is also included in Java 6 (or more specifically, in Sun's JDK 1.6.0_04 and above; previous Sun JDK 1.6.0 releases included JAX-WS 2.0), integrated with the JDK's built-in HTTP server. Spring can work with both standard Java web services APIs. On Java EE 5 / Java 6, the obvious choice is JAX-WS. On J2EE 1.4 environments that run on Java 5, you might have the option to plug in a JAX-WS provider; check your Java EE server's documentation. |
In addition to stock support for JAX-RPC and JAX-WS in Spring Core, the Spring portfolio also features Spring Web Services, a solution for contract-first, document-driven web services - highly recommended for building modern, future-proof web services.
Spring provides a convenience base class for JAX-RPC servlet
endpoint implementations -
ServletEndpointSupport
. To expose our
AccountService
we extend Spring's
ServletEndpointSupport
class and implement our
business logic here, usually delegating the call to the business
layer.
/** * JAX-RPC compliant RemoteAccountService implementation that simply delegates * to the AccountService implementation in the root web application context. * * This wrapper class is necessary because JAX-RPC requires working with dedicated * endpoint classes. If an existing service needs to be exported, a wrapper that * extends ServletEndpointSupport for simple application context access is * the simplest JAX-RPC compliant way. * * This is the class registered with the server-side JAX-RPC implementation. * In the case of Axis, this happens in "server-config.wsdd" respectively via * deployment calls. The web service engine manages the lifecycle of instances * of this class: A Spring application context can just be accessed here. */import org.springframework.remoting.jaxrpc.ServletEndpointSupport; public class AccountServiceEndpoint extends ServletEndpointSupport implements RemoteAccountService { private AccountService biz; protected void onInit() { this.biz = (AccountService) getWebApplicationContext().getBean("accountService"); } public void insertAccount(Account acc) throws RemoteException { biz.insertAccount(acc); } public Account[] getAccounts(String name) throws RemoteException { return biz.getAccounts(name); } }
Our AccountServletEndpoint
needs to run in
the same web application as the Spring context to allow for access to
Spring's facilities. In case of Axis, copy the
AxisServlet
definition into your
'web.xml'
, and set up the endpoint in
'server-config.wsdd'
(or use the deploy tool). See
the sample application JPetStore where the
OrderService
is exposed as a web service
using Axis.
Spring provides two factory beans to create JAX-RPC web service
proxies, namely LocalJaxRpcServiceFactoryBean
and
JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean
. The former can only
return a JAX-RPC service class for us to work with. The latter is the
full-fledged version that can return a proxy that implements our
business service interface. In this example we use the latter to create
a proxy for the AccountService
endpoint
we exposed in the previous section. You will see that Spring has great
support for web services requiring little coding efforts - most of the
setup is done in the Spring configuration file as usual:
<bean id="accountWebService" class="org.springframework.remoting.jaxrpc.JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.RemoteAccountService"/> <property name="wsdlDocumentUrl" value="http://localhost:8080/account/services/accountService?WSDL"/> <property name="namespaceUri" value="http://localhost:8080/account/services/accountService"/> <property name="serviceName" value="AccountService"/> <property name="portName" value="AccountPort"/> </bean>
Where serviceInterface
is our remote business
interface the clients will use. wsdlDocumentUrl
is
the URL for the WSDL file. Spring needs this at startup time to create
the JAX-RPC Service. namespaceUri
corresponds to the
targetNamespace in the .wsdl file. serviceName
corresponds to the service name in the .wsdl file.
portName
corresponds to the port name in the .wsdl
file.
Accessing the web service is now very easy as we have a bean
factory for it that will expose it as
RemoteAccountService
interface. We can wire this up
in Spring:
<bean id="client" class="example.AccountClientImpl"> ... <property name="service" ref="accountWebService"/> </bean>
From the client code we can access the web service just as if it
was a normal class, except that it throws
RemoteException
.
public class AccountClientImpl { private RemoteAccountService service; public void setService(RemoteAccountService service) { this.service = service; } public void foo() { try { service.insertAccount(...); } catch (RemoteException ex) { // ouch } } }
We can get rid of the checked
RemoteException
since Spring supports
automatic conversion to its corresponding unchecked
RemoteException
. This requires that we
provide a non-RMI interface also. Our configuration is now:
<bean id="accountWebService" class="org.springframework.remoting.jaxrpc.JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> <property name="portInterface" value="example.RemoteAccountService"/> ... </bean>
Where serviceInterface
is changed to our non
RMI interface. Our RMI interface is now defined using the property
portInterface
. Our client code can now avoid handling
java.rmi.RemoteException
:
public class AccountClientImpl { private AccountService service; public void setService(AccountService service) { this.service = service; } public void foo() { service.insertAccount(...); } }
Note that you can also drop the "portInterface" part and specify a
plain business interface as "serviceInterface". In this case,
JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean
will automatically
switch to the JAX-RPC "Dynamic Invocation Interface", performing dynamic
invocations without a fixed port stub. The advantage is that you don't
even need to have an RMI-compliant Java port interface around (e.g. in
case of a non-Java target web service); all you need is a matching
business interface. Check out
JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean
's javadoc for details
on the runtime implications.
To transfer complex objects over the wire such as
Account
we must register bean mappings on the
client side.
Note | |
---|---|
On the server side using Axis registering bean mappings is
usually done in the |
We will use Axis to register bean mappings on the client side. To do this we need to register the bean mappings programmatically:
public class AxisPortProxyFactoryBean extends JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean { protected void postProcessJaxRpcService(Service service) { TypeMappingRegistry registry = service.getTypeMappingRegistry(); TypeMapping mapping = registry.createTypeMapping(); registerBeanMapping(mapping, Account.class, "Account"); registry.register("http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/", mapping); } protected void registerBeanMapping(TypeMapping mapping, Class type, String name) { QName qName = new QName("http://localhost:8080/account/services/accountService", name); mapping.register(type, qName, new BeanSerializerFactory(type, qName), new BeanDeserializerFactory(type, qName)); } }
In this section we will register our own
javax.rpc.xml.handler.Handler
to the web
service proxy where we can do custom code before the SOAP message is
sent over the wire. The Handler
is a
callback interface. There is a convenience base class provided in
jaxrpc.jar
, namely
javax.rpc.xml.handler.GenericHandler
that we will
extend:
public class AccountHandler extends GenericHandler { public QName[] getHeaders() { return null; } public boolean handleRequest(MessageContext context) { SOAPMessageContext smc = (SOAPMessageContext) context; SOAPMessage msg = smc.getMessage(); try { SOAPEnvelope envelope = msg.getSOAPPart().getEnvelope(); SOAPHeader header = envelope.getHeader(); ... } catch (SOAPException ex) { throw new JAXRPCException(ex); } return true; } }
What we need to do now is to register our AccountHandler to
JAX-RPC Service so it would invoke
handleRequest(..)
before the message is sent
over the wire. Spring has at this time of writing no declarative support
for registering handlers, so we must use the programmatic approach.
However Spring has made it very easy for us to do this as we can
override the postProcessJaxRpcService(..)
method that is designed for this:
public class AccountHandlerJaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean extends JaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean { protected void postProcessJaxRpcService(Service service) { QName port = new QName(this.getNamespaceUri(), this.getPortName()); List list = service.getHandlerRegistry().getHandlerChain(port); list.add(new HandlerInfo(AccountHandler.class, null, null)); logger.info("Registered JAX-RPC AccountHandler on port " + port); } }
The last thing we must remember to do is to change the Spring configuration to use our factory bean:
<bean id="accountWebService" class="example.AccountHandlerJaxRpcPortProxyFactoryBean"> ... </bean>
Spring provides a convenient base class for JAX-WS servlet
endpoint implementations -
SpringBeanAutowiringSupport
. To expose our
AccountService
we extend Spring's
SpringBeanAutowiringSupport
class and implement
our business logic here, usually delegating the call to the business
layer. We'll simply use Spring 2.5's @Autowired
annotation for expressing such dependencies on Spring-managed
beans.
/** * JAX-WS compliant AccountService implementation that simply delegates * to the AccountService implementation in the root web application context. * * This wrapper class is necessary because JAX-WS requires working with dedicated * endpoint classes. If an existing service needs to be exported, a wrapper that * extends SpringBeanAutowiringSupport for simple Spring bean autowiring (through * the @Autowired annotation) is the simplest JAX-WS compliant way. * * This is the class registered with the server-side JAX-WS implementation. * In the case of a Java EE 5 server, this would simply be defined as a servlet * in web.xml, with the server detecting that this is a JAX-WS endpoint and reacting * accordingly. The servlet name usually needs to match the specified WS service name. * * The web service engine manages the lifecycle of instances of this class. * Spring bean references will just be wired in here. */ import org.springframework.web.context.support.SpringBeanAutowiringSupport; @WebService(serviceName="AccountService") public class AccountServiceEndpoint extends SpringBeanAutowiringSupport { @Autowired private AccountService biz; @WebMethod public void insertAccount(Account acc) { biz.insertAccount(acc); } @WebMethod public Account[] getAccounts(String name) { return biz.getAccounts(name); } }
Our AccountServletEndpoint
needs to run in
the same web application as the Spring context to allow for access to
Spring's facilities. This is the case by default in Java EE 5
environments, using the standard contract for JAX-WS servlet endpoint
deployment. See Java EE 5 web service tutorials for details.
The built-in JAX-WS provider that comes with Sun's JDK 1.6
supports exposure of web services using the built-in HTTP server that's
included in JDK 1.6 as well. Spring's
SimpleJaxWsServiceExporter
detects all
@WebService
annotated beans in the Spring application
context, exporting them through the default JAX-WS server (the JDK 1.6
HTTP server).
In this scenario, the endpoint instances are defined and managed
as Spring beans themselves; they will be registered with the JAX-WS
engine but their lifecycle will be up to the Spring application context.
This means that Spring functionality like explicit dependency injection
may be applied to the endpoint instances. Of course, annotation-driven
injection through @Autowired
will work as
well.
<bean class="org.springframework.remoting.jaxws.SimpleJaxWsServiceExporter"> <property name="baseAddress" value="http://localhost:8080/"/> </bean> <bean id="accountServiceEndpoint" class="example.AccountServiceEndpoint"> ... </bean> ...
The AccountServiceEndpoint
may derive from
Spring's SpringBeanAutowiringSupport
but doesn't
have to since the endpoint is a fully Spring-managed bean here. This
means that the endpoint implementation may look like as follows, without
any superclass declared - and Spring's @Autowired
configuration annotation still being honored:
@WebService(serviceName="AccountService") public class AccountServiceEndpoint { @Autowired private AccountService biz; @WebMethod public void insertAccount(Account acc) { biz.insertAccount(acc); } @WebMethod public List<Account> getAccounts(String name) { return biz.getAccounts(name); } }
Sun's JAX-WS RI, developed as part of the GlassFish project, ships Spring support as part of its JAX-WS Commons project. This allows for defining JAX-WS endpoints as Spring-managed beans, similar to the standalone mode discussed in the previous section - but this time in a Servlet environment. Note that this is not portable in a Java EE 5 environment; it is mainly intended for non-EE environments such as Tomcat, embedding the JAX-WS RI as part of the web application.
The difference to the standard style of exporting servlet-based
endpoints is that the lifecycle of the endpoint instances themselves
will be managed by Spring here, and that there will be only one JAX-WS
servlet defined in web.xml
. With the standard Java EE
5 style (as illustrated above), you'll have one servlet definition per
service endpoint, with each endpoint typically delegating to Spring
beans (through the use of @Autowired
, as shown
above).
Check out https://jax-ws-commons.dev.java.net/spring/ for the details on setup and usage style.
Analogous to the JAX-RPC support, Spring provides two factory
beans to create JAX-WS web service proxies, namely
LocalJaxWsServiceFactoryBean
and
JaxWsPortProxyFactoryBean
. The former can only
return a JAX-WS service class for us to work with. The latter is the
full-fledged version that can return a proxy that implements our
business service interface. In this example we use the latter to create
a proxy for the AccountService
endpoint
(again):
<bean id="accountWebService" class="org.springframework.remoting.jaxws.JaxWsPortProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceInterface" value="example.AccountService"/> <property name="wsdlDocumentUrl" value="http://localhost:8888/AccountServiceEndpoint?WSDL"/> <property name="namespaceUri" value="http://example/"/> <property name="serviceName" value="AccountService"/> <property name="portName" value="AccountServiceEndpointPort"/> </bean>
Where serviceInterface
is our business
interface the clients will use. wsdlDocumentUrl
is
the URL for the WSDL file. Spring needs this a startup time to create
the JAX-WS Service. namespaceUri
corresponds to the
targetNamespace in the .wsdl file. serviceName
corresponds to the service name in the .wsdl file.
portName
corresponds to the port name in the .wsdl
file.
Accessing the web service is now very easy as we have a bean
factory for it that will expose it as AccountService
interface. We can wire this up in Spring:
<bean id="client" class="example.AccountClientImpl"> ... <property name="service" ref="accountWebService"/> </bean>
From the client code we can access the web service just as if it was a normal class:
public class AccountClientImpl { private AccountService service; public void setService(AccountService service) { this.service = service; } public void foo() { service.insertAccount(...); } }
NOTE: The above is slightly simplified in
that JAX-WS requires endpoint interfaces and implementation classes to
be annotated with @WebService
,
@SOAPBinding
etc annotations. This means that you
cannot (easily) use plain Java interfaces and implementation classes as
JAX-WS endpoint artifacts; you need to annotate them accordingly first.
Check the JAX-WS documentation for details on those requirements.
It is also possible to expose services transparently using JMS as
the underlying communication protocol. The JMS remoting support in the
Spring Framework is pretty basic - it sends and receives on the
same thread
and in the same
non-transactional Session
, and
as such throughput will be very implementation dependent. Note that
these single-threaded and non-transactional constraints apply only to
Spring's JMS remoting support. See
Chapter 22, JMS (Java Message Service) for information on Spring's rich support for
JMS-based messaging.
The following interface is used on both the server and the client side.
package com.foo; public interface CheckingAccountService { public void cancelAccount(Long accountId); }
The following simple implementation of the above interface is used on the server-side.
package com.foo; public class SimpleCheckingAccountService implements CheckingAccountService { public void cancelAccount(Long accountId) { System.out.println("Cancelling account [" + accountId + "]"); } }
This configuration file contains the JMS-infrastructure beans that are shared on both the client and server.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean id="connectionFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> <property name="brokerURL" value="tcp://ep-t43:61616"/> </bean> <bean id="queue" class="org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQQueue"> <constructor-arg value="mmm"/> </bean> </beans>
On the server, you just need to expose the service object using
the JmsInvokerServiceExporter
.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean id="checkingAccountService" class="org.springframework.jms.remoting.JmsInvokerServiceExporter"> <property name="serviceInterface" value="com.foo.CheckingAccountService"/> <property name="service"> <bean class="com.foo.SimpleCheckingAccountService"/> </property> </bean> <bean class="org.springframework.jms.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer"> <property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory"/> <property name="destination" ref="queue"/> <property name="concurrentConsumers" value="3"/> <property name="messageListener" ref="checkingAccountService"/> </bean> </beans>
package com.foo; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; public class Server { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[]{"com/foo/server.xml", "com/foo/jms.xml"}); } }
The client merely needs to create a client-side proxy that will
implement the agreed upon interface
(CheckingAccountService
). The resulting
object created off the back of the following bean definition can be
injected into other client side objects, and the proxy will take care of
forwarding the call to the server-side object via JMS.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean id="checkingAccountService" class="org.springframework.jms.remoting.JmsInvokerProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="serviceInterface" value="com.foo.CheckingAccountService"/> <property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory"/> <property name="queue" ref="queue"/> </bean> </beans>
package com.foo; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; public class Client { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext( new String[] {"com/foo/client.xml", "com/foo/jms.xml"}); CheckingAccountService service = (CheckingAccountService) ctx.getBean("checkingAccountService"); service.cancelAccount(new Long(10)); } }
You may also wish to investigate the support provided by the Lingo project, which (to quote the homepage blurb) “ ... is a lightweight POJO based remoting and messaging library based on the Spring Framework's remoting libraries which extends it to support JMS. ”
The main reason why auto-detection of implemented interfaces does
not occur for remote interfaces is to avoid opening too many doors to
remote callers. The target object might implement internal callback
interfaces like InitializingBean
or
DisposableBean
which one would not want to
expose to callers.
Offering a proxy with all interfaces implemented by the target usually does not matter in the local case. But when exporting a remote service, you should expose a specific service interface, with specific operations intended for remote usage. Besides internal callback interfaces, the target might implement multiple business interfaces, with just one of them intended for remote exposure. For these reasons, we require such a service interface to be specified.
This is a trade-off between configuration convenience and the risk of accidental exposure of internal methods. Always specifying a service interface is not too much effort, and puts you on the safe side regarding controlled exposure of specific methods.
Each and every technology presented here has its drawbacks. You should carefully consider your needs, the services you are exposing and the objects you'll be sending over the wire when choosing a technology.
When using RMI, it's not possible to access the objects through the HTTP protocol, unless you're tunneling the RMI traffic. RMI is a fairly heavy-weight protocol in that it supports full-object serialization which is important when using a complex data model that needs serialization over the wire. However, RMI-JRMP is tied to Java clients: It is a Java-to-Java remoting solution.
Spring's HTTP invoker is a good choice if you need HTTP-based remoting but also rely on Java serialization. It shares the basic infrastructure with RMI invokers, just using HTTP as transport. Note that HTTP invokers are not only limited to Java-to-Java remoting but also to Spring on both the client and server side. (The latter also applies to Spring's RMI invoker for non-RMI interfaces.)
Hessian and/or Burlap might provide significant value when operating in a heterogeneous environment, because they explicitly allow for non-Java clients. However, non-Java support is still limited. Known issues include the serialization of Hibernate objects in combination with lazily-initialized collections. If you have such a data model, consider using RMI or HTTP invokers instead of Hessian.
JMS can be useful for providing clusters of services and allowing the JMS broker to take care of load balancing, discovery and auto-failover. By default: Java serialization is used when using JMS remoting but the JMS provider could use a different mechanism for the wire formatting, such as XStream to allow servers to be implemented in other technologies.
Last but not least, EJB has an advantage over RMI in that it supports standard role-based authentication and authorization and remote transaction propagation. It is possible to get RMI invokers or HTTP invokers to support security context propagation as well, although this is not provided by core Spring: There are just appropriate hooks for plugging in third-party or custom solutions here.
The RestTemplate
is the core class for
client-side access to RESTful services. It is conceptually similar to
other template classes in Spring, such as
JdbcTemplate
and JmsTemplate
and other template classes found in other Spring portfolio projects.
RestTemplate
's behavior is customized by providing
callback methods and configuring the
HttpMessageConverter
used to marshal
objects into the HTTP request body and to unmarshal any response back
into an object. As it is common to use XML as a message format, Spring
provides a MarshallingHttpMessageConverter
that
uses the Object-to-XML framework that is part of the
org.springframework.oxm
package. This gives you a
wide range of choices of XML to Object mapping technologies to choose
from.
This section describes how to use the
RestTemplate
and its associated
HttpMessageConverters
.
Invoking RESTful services in Java is typically done using a helper
class such as Jakarta Commons HttpClient
. For
common REST operations this approach is too low level as shown
below.
String uri = "http://example.com/hotels/1/bookings"; PostMethod post = new PostMethod(uri); String request = // create booking request content post.setRequestEntity(new StringRequestEntity(request)); httpClient.executeMethod(post); if (HttpStatus.SC_CREATED == post.getStatusCode()) { Header location = post.getRequestHeader("Location"); if (location != null) { System.out.println("Created new booking at :" + location.getValue()); } }
RestTemplate provides higher level methods that correspond to each of the six main HTTP methods that make invoking many RESTful services a one-liner and enforce REST best practices.
Table 20.1. Overview of RestTemplate methods
The names of RestTemplate
methods follow a
naming convention, the first part indicates what HTTP method is being
invoked and the second part indicates what is returned. For example, the
method getForObject()
will perform a GET, convert
the HTTP response into an object type of your choice and return that
object. The method postForLocation()
will do a
POST, converting the given object into a HTTP request and return the
response HTTP Location header where the newly created object can be
found. In case of an exception processing the HTTP request, an exception
of the type RestClientException
will be
thrown; this behavior can be changed by plugging in another ResponseErrorHandler
implementation into the RestTemplate
.
Objects passed to and returned from these methods are converted to
and from HTTP messages by
HttpMessageConverter
instances.
Converters for the main mime types are registered by default, but you
can also write your own converter and register it via the
messageConverters()
bean property. The default
converter instances registered with the template are
ByteArrayHttpMessageConverter
,
StringHttpMessageConverter
,
FormHttpMessageConverter
and
SourceHttpMessageConverter
. You can override
these defaults using the messageConverters()
bean
property as would be required if using the
MarshallingHttpMessageConverter
or
MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter
.
Each method takes URI template arguments in two forms, either as a
String
variable length argument or a
Map<String,String>
. For example,
String result = restTemplate.getForObject("http://example.com/hotels/{hotel}/bookings/{booking}", String.class,"42", "21");
using variable length arguments and
Map<String, String> vars = Collections.singletonMap("hotel", "42"); String result = restTemplate.getForObject("http://example.com/hotels/{hotel}/rooms/{hotel}", String.class, vars);
using a Map<String,String>
.
To create an instance of RestTemplate
you can
simply call the default no-arg constructor. This will use standard Java
classes from the java.net
package as the underlying
implementation to create HTTP requests. This can be overridden by
specifying an implementation of
ClientHttpRequestFactory
. Spring provides
the implementation
CommonsClientHttpRequestFactory
that uses the
Jakarta Commons HttpClient
to create requests.
CommonsClientHttpRequestFactory
is configured
using an instance of
org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient
which
can in turn be configured with credentials information or connection
pooling functionality.
The previous example using Jakarta Commons
HttpClient
directly rewritten to use the
RestTemplate
is shown below
uri = "http://example.com/hotels/{id}/bookings"; RestTemplate template = new RestTemplate(); Booking booking = // create booking object URI location = template.postForLocation(uri, booking, "1");
The general callback interface is
RequestCallback
and is called when the
execute method is invoked.
public <T> T execute(String url, HttpMethod method, RequestCallback requestCallback, ResponseExtractor<T> responseExtractor, String... urlVariables) // also has an overload with urlVariables as a Map<String, String>.
The RequestCallback
interface is
defined as
public interface RequestCallback { void doWithRequest(ClientHttpRequest request) throws IOException; }
and allows you to manipulate the request headers and write to the request body. When using the execute method you do not have to worry about any resource management, the template will always close the request and handle any errors. Refer to the API documentation for more information on using the execute method and the meaning of its other method arguments.
For each of the main HTTP methods, the RestTemplate
provides variants that either take a String URI or java.net.URI
as the first argument.
The String URI variants accept template arguments as a
String variable length argument or as a Map<String,String>
.
They also assume the URL String is not encoded and needs to be encoded.
For example the following:
restTemplate.getForObject("http://example.com/hotel list", String.class);
will perform a GET on http://example.com/hotel%20list
.
That means if the input URL String is already encoded, it will be encoded twice --
i.e. http://example.com/hotel%20list
will become
http://example.com/hotel%2520list
.
If this is not the intended effect, use the
java.net.URI
method variant, which assumes
the URL is already encoded is also generally useful if you want
to reuse a single (fully expanded) URI
multiple times.
The UriComponentsBuilder
class can be used
to build and encode the URI
including support
for URI templates. For example you can start with a URL String:
UriComponents uriComponents = UriComponentsBuilder.fromUriString("http://example.com/hotels/{hotel}/bookings/{booking}").build() .expand("42", "21") .encode(); URI uri = uriComponents.toUri();
Or specify each URI component indiviudally:
UriComponents uriComponents = UriComponentsBuilder.newInstance() .scheme("http").host("example.com").path("/hotels/{hotel}/bookings/{booking}").build() .expand("42", "21") .encode(); URI uri = uriComponents.toUri();
Besides the methods described above, the RestTemplate
also has the exchange()
method, which can be
used for arbitrary HTTP method execution based on the HttpEntity
class.
Perhaps most importantly, the exchange()
method can be used to add request headers and read response headers.
For example:
HttpHeaders requestHeaders = new HttpHeaders(); requestHeaders.set("MyRequestHeader", "MyValue"); HttpEntity<?> requestEntity = new HttpEntity(requestHeaders); HttpEntity<String> response = template.exchange("http://example.com/hotels/{hotel}", HttpMethod.GET, requestEntity, String.class, "42"); String responseHeader = response.getHeaders().getFirst("MyResponseHeader"); String body = response.getBody();
In the above example, we first prepare a request entity that contains the
MyRequestHeader
header. We then retrieve the response, and
read the MyResponseHeader
and body.
Objects passed to and returned from the methods
getForObject()
,
postForLocation()
, and
put()
are converted to HTTP requests and from
HTTP responses by HttpMessageConverters
.
The HttpMessageConverter
interface is
shown below to give you a better feel for its functionality
public interface HttpMessageConverter<T> { // Indicate whether the given class and media type can be read by this converter. boolean canRead(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType); // Indicate whether the given class and media type can be written by this converter. boolean canWrite(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType); // Return the list of MediaType objects supported by this converter. List<MediaType> getSupportedMediaTypes(); // Read an object of the given type from the given input message, and returns it. T read(Class<T> clazz, HttpInputMessage inputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotReadableException; // Write an given object to the given output message. void write(T t, HttpOutputMessage outputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotWritableException; }
Concrete implementations for the main media (mime) types are
provided in the framework and are registered by default with the
RestTemplate
on the client-side and with
AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter
on the
server-side.
The implementations of
HttpMessageConverter
s are described in the
following sections. For all converters a default media type is used but
can be overridden by setting the
supportedMediaTypes
bean property
An HttpMessageConverter
implementation that can read and write Strings from the HTTP request
and response. By default, this converter supports all text media types
(text/*
), and writes with a
Content-Type
of
text/plain
.
An HttpMessageConverter
implementation that can read and write form data from the HTTP request
and response. By default, this converter reads and writes the media
type application/x-www-form-urlencoded
. Form data
is read from and written into a MultiValueMap<String,
String>
.
An HttpMessageConverter
implementation that can read and write byte arrays from the HTTP
request and response. By default, this converter supports all media
types (*/*
), and writes with a
Content-Type
of
application/octet-stream
. This can be overridden by
setting the supportedMediaTypes property, and
overriding getContentType(byte[])
.
An HttpMessageConverter
implementation that can read and write XML using Spring's
Marshaller
and
Unmarshaller
abstractions from the
org.springframework.oxm
package. This converter
requires a Marshaller
and
Unmarshaller
before it can be used.
These can be injected via constructor or bean properties. By default
this converter supports (text/xml
) and
(application/xml
).
An HttpMessageConverter
implementation that can read and write JSON using Jackson's
ObjectMapper
. JSON mapping can be
customized as needed through the use of Jackson's provided annotations. When
further control is needed, a custom
ObjectMapper
can be injected through
the ObjectMapper
property for cases where custom
JSON serializers/deserializers need to be provided for specific types.
By default this converter supports (application/json
).
An HttpMessageConverter
implementation that can read and write
javax.xml.transform.Source
from the HTTP
request and response. Only DOMSource
,
SAXSource
, and
StreamSource
are supported. By default, this
converter supports (text/xml
) and
(application/xml
).