Annotation Interface EnableTransactionManagement
<tx:*>
XML namespace. To be used on
@Configuration
classes to configure traditional, imperative transaction management or
reactive transaction management.
The following example demonstrates imperative transaction management
using a PlatformTransactionManager
. For reactive transaction management, configure a
ReactiveTransactionManager
instead.
@Configuration @EnableTransactionManagement public class AppConfig { @Bean public FooRepository fooRepository() { // configure and return a class having @Transactional methods return new JdbcFooRepository(dataSource()); } @Bean public DataSource dataSource() { // configure and return the necessary JDBC DataSource } @Bean public PlatformTransactionManager txManager() { return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource()); } }
For reference, the example above can be compared to the following Spring XML configuration:
<beans> <tx:annotation-driven/> <bean id="fooRepository" class="com.foo.JdbcFooRepository"> <constructor-arg ref="dataSource"/> </bean> <bean id="dataSource" class="com.vendor.VendorDataSource"/> <bean id="transactionManager" class="org.sfwk...DataSourceTransactionManager"> <constructor-arg ref="dataSource"/> </bean> </beans>In both of the scenarios above,
@EnableTransactionManagement
and
<tx:annotation-driven/>
are responsible for registering the necessary Spring
components that power annotation-driven transaction management, such as the
TransactionInterceptor and the proxy- or AspectJ-based advice that weaves the
interceptor into the call stack when JdbcFooRepository
's @Transactional
methods are invoked.
A minor difference between the two examples lies in the naming of the
TransactionManager
bean: In the @Bean
case, the name is
"txManager" (per the name of the method); in the XML case, the name is
"transactionManager". <tx:annotation-driven/>
is hard-wired to
look for a bean named "transactionManager" by default, however
@EnableTransactionManagement
is more flexible; it will fall back to a by-type
lookup for any TransactionManager
bean in the container. Thus the name
can be "txManager", "transactionManager", or "tm": it simply does not matter.
For those that wish to establish a more direct relationship between
@EnableTransactionManagement
and the exact transaction manager bean to be used,
the TransactionManagementConfigurer
callback interface may be implemented -
notice the implements
clause and the @Override
-annotated method below:
@Configuration @EnableTransactionManagement public class AppConfig implements TransactionManagementConfigurer { @Bean public FooRepository fooRepository() { // configure and return a class having @Transactional methods return new JdbcFooRepository(dataSource()); } @Bean public DataSource dataSource() { // configure and return the necessary JDBC DataSource } @Bean public PlatformTransactionManager txManager() { return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource()); } @Override public PlatformTransactionManager annotationDrivenTransactionManager() { return txManager(); } }
This approach may be desirable simply because it is more explicit, or it may be
necessary in order to distinguish between two TransactionManager
beans
present in the same container. As the name suggests, the
annotationDrivenTransactionManager()
will be the one used for processing
@Transactional
methods. See TransactionManagementConfigurer
Javadoc
for further details.
The mode()
attribute controls how advice is applied: If the mode is
AdviceMode.PROXY
(the default), then the other attributes control the behavior
of the proxying. Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through
the proxy only; local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way.
Note that if the mode() is set to AdviceMode.ASPECTJ
, then the
value of the proxyTargetClass()
attribute will be ignored. Note also that in
this case the spring-aspects
module JAR must be present on the classpath, with
compile-time weaving or load-time weaving applying the aspect to the affected classes.
There is no proxy involved in such a scenario; local calls will be intercepted as well.
- Since:
- 3.1
- Author:
- Chris Beams, Juergen Hoeller
- See Also:
-
Optional Element Summary
Modifier and TypeOptional ElementDescriptionIndicate how transactional advice should be applied.int
Indicate the ordering of the execution of the transaction advisor when multiple advices are applied at a specific joinpoint.boolean
Indicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created (true
) as opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies (false
).Indicate the rollback behavior for rule-based transactions without custom rollback rules: default is rollback on unchecked exception, this can be switched to rollback on any exception (including checked).
-
Element Details
-
proxyTargetClass
boolean proxyTargetClassIndicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created (true
) as opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies (false
). The default isfalse
. Applicable only ifmode()
is set toAdviceMode.PROXY
.Note that setting this attribute to
true
will affect all Spring-managed beans requiring proxying, not just those marked with@Transactional
. For example, other beans marked with Spring's@Async
annotation will be upgraded to subclass proxying at the same time. This approach has no negative impact in practice unless one is explicitly expecting one type of proxy vs another, e.g. in tests.- Default:
- false
-
mode
AdviceMode modeIndicate how transactional advice should be applied.The default is
AdviceMode.PROXY
. Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through the proxy only. Local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way; anTransactional
annotation on such a method within a local call will be ignored since Spring's interceptor does not even kick in for such a runtime scenario. For a more advanced mode of interception, consider switching this toAdviceMode.ASPECTJ
.- Default:
- PROXY
-
order
int orderIndicate the ordering of the execution of the transaction advisor when multiple advices are applied at a specific joinpoint.The default is
Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE
.- Default:
- 2147483647
-
rollbackOn
RollbackOn rollbackOnIndicate the rollback behavior for rule-based transactions without custom rollback rules: default is rollback on unchecked exception, this can be switched to rollback on any exception (including checked).Note that transaction-specific rollback rules override the default behavior but retain the chosen default for unspecified exceptions. This is the case for Spring's
Transactional
as well as JTA'sTransactional
when used with Spring here.Unless you rely on EJB-style business exceptions with commit behavior, it is advisable to switch to
RollbackOn.ALL_EXCEPTIONS
for a consistent rollback even in case of a (potentially accidental) checked exception. Also, it is advisable to make that switch for Kotlin-based applications where there is no enforcement of checked exceptions at all.- Since:
- 6.2
- See Also:
- Default:
- RUNTIME_EXCEPTIONS
-