Spring Integration provides Channel Adapters for receiving and sending JMS messages. There are actually two
JMS-based inbound Channel Adapters. The first uses Spring's
JmsTemplate to receive based on
a polling period. The second is "message-driven" and relies upon a Spring MessageListener container. There is also
an outbound Channel Adapter which uses the
JmsTemplate to convert and send a JMS Message on
Whereas the JMS Channel Adapters are intended for unidirectional Messaging (send-only or receive-only), Spring Integration also provides inbound and outbound JMS Gateways for request/reply operations. The inbound gateway relies on one of Spring's MessageListener container implementations for Message-driven reception that is also capable of sending a return value to the "reply-to" Destination as provided by the received Message. The outbound Gateway sends a JMS Message to a "request-destination" and then receives a reply Message. The "reply-destination" reference (or "reply-destination-name") can be configured explicitly or else the outbound gateway will use a JMS TemporaryQueue.
The inbound Channel Adapter requires a reference to either a single
instance or both
(a 'destinationName' can be provided in place of the 'destination' reference). The following example defines an
inbound Channel Adapter with a
<jms:inbound-channel-adapter id="jmsIn" destination="inQueue" channel="exampleChannel"> <integration:poller fixed-rate="30000"/> </jms:inbound-channel-adapter>
|Notice from the configuration that the inbound-channel-adapter is a Polling Consumer. That means that it invokes receive() when triggered. This should only be used in situations where polling is done relatively infrequently and timeliness is not important. For all other situations (a vast majority of JMS-based use-cases), the message-driven-channel-adapter described below is a better option.|
|All of the JMS adapters that require a reference to the ConnectionFactory will automatically look for a bean named "connectionFactory" by default. That is why you don't see a "connection-factory" attribute in many of the examples. However, if your JMS ConnectionFactory has a different bean name, then you will need to provide that attribute.|
If 'extract-payload' is set to true (which is the default), the received JMS Message will be passed through the MessageConverter. When relying on the default SimpleMessageConverter, this means that the resulting Spring Integration Message will have the JMS Message's body as its payload. A JMS TextMessage will produce a String-based payload, a JMS BytesMessage will produce a byte array payload, and a JMS ObjectMessage's Serializable instance will become the Spring Integration Message's payload. If instead you prefer to have the raw JMS Message as the Spring Integration Message's payload, then set 'extract-payload' to false.
<jms:inbound-channel-adapter id="jmsIn" destination="inQueue" channel="exampleChannel" extract-payload="false"/> <integration:poller fixed-rate="30000"/> </jms:inbound-channel-adapter>
The "message-driven-channel-adapter" requires a reference to either an instance of a Spring MessageListener
container (any subclass of
AbstractMessageListenerContainer) or both
(a 'destinationName' can be provided in place of the 'destination' reference). The following example defines a
message-driven Channel Adapter with a
<jms:message-driven-channel-adapter id="jmsIn" destination="inQueue" channel="exampleChannel"/>
|The Message-Driven adapter also accepts several properties that pertain to the MessageListener container. These values are only considered if you do not provide an actual 'container' reference. In that case, an instance of DefaultMessageListenerContainer will be created and configured based on these properties. For example, you can specify the "transaction-manager" reference, the "concurrent-consumers" value, and several other property references and values. Refer to the JavaDoc and Spring Integration's JMS Schema (spring-integration-jms-2.0.xsd) for more detail.|
The 'extract-payload' property has the same effect as described above, and once again its default value
is 'true'. The poller sub-element is not applicable for a message-driven
Channel Adapter, as it will be actively invoked. For most usage scenarios, the message-driven approach is better since the Messages will
be passed along to the
MessageChannel as soon as they are received from the underlying
Finally, the <message-driven-channel-adapter> also accepts the 'error-channel' attribute. This provides the same basic functionality as described in Section 7.2.1, “GatewayProxyFactoryBean”.
<jms:message-driven-channel-adapter id="jmsIn" destination="inQueue" channel="exampleChannel" error-channel="exampleErrorChannel"/>
When comparing this to the generic gateway configuration, or the JMS 'inbound-gateway' that will be discussed below, the key difference here is that we are in a one-way flow since this is a 'channel-adapter', not a gateway. Therefore, the flow downstream from the 'error-channel' should also be one-way. For example, it could simply send to a logging handler, or it could be connected to a different JMS <outbound-channel-adapter> element.
JmsSendingMessageHandler implements the
interface and is capable of converting Spring Integration
Messages to JMS messages
and then sending to a JMS destination. It requires either a 'jmsTemplate' reference or both 'connectionFactory' and
'destination' references (again, the 'destinationName' may be provided in place of the 'destination'). As with the
inbound Channel Adapter, the easiest way to configure this adapter is with the namespace support. The following
configuration will produce an adapter that receives Spring Integration Messages from the "exampleChannel" and then
converts those into JMS Messages and sends them to the JMS Destination reference whose bean name is "outQueue".
<jms:outbound-channel-adapter id="jmsOut" destination="outQueue" channel="exampleChannel"/>
As with the inbound Channel Adapters, there is an 'extract-payload' property. However, the meaning is reversed for the outbound adapter. Rather than applying to the JMS Message, the boolean property applies to the Spring Integration Message payload. In other words, the decision is whether to pass the Spring Integration Message itself as the JMS Message body or whether to pass the Spring Integration Message's payload as the JMS Message body. The default value is once again 'true'. Therefore, if you pass a Spring Integration Message whose payload is a String, a JMS TextMessage will be created. If on the other hand you want to send the actual Spring Integration Message to another system via JMS, then simply set this to 'false'.
|Regardless of the boolean value for payload extraction, the Spring Integration MessageHeaders will map to JMS properties as long as you are relying on the default converter or provide a reference to another instance of HeaderMappingMessageConverter (the same holds true for 'inbound' adapters except that in those cases, it's the JMS properties mapping to Spring Integration MessageHeaders).|
Spring Integration's message-driven JMS inbound-gateway delegates to a
MessageListener container, supports dynamically adjusting concurrent consumers,
and can also handle replies. The inbound gateway requires references to a
ConnectionFactory, and a request
'requestDestinationName'). The following example defines a JMS "inbound-gateway" that receives from the JMS
queue referenced by the bean id "inQueue" and sends to the Spring Integration channel named "exampleChannel".
<jms:inbound-gateway id="jmsInGateway" request-destination="inQueue" request-channel="exampleChannel"/>
Since the gateways provide request/reply behavior instead of unidirectional send or receive, they also have two distinct properties for the "payload extraction" (as discussed above for the Channel Adapters' 'extract-payload' setting). For an inbound-gateway, the 'extract-request-payload' property determines whether the received JMS Message body will be extracted. If 'false', the JMS Message itself will become the Spring Integration Message payload. The default is 'true'.
Similarly, for an inbound-gateway the 'extract-reply-payload' property applies to the Spring Integration Message that is going to be converted into a reply JMS Message. If you want to pass the whole Spring Integration Message (as the body of a JMS ObjectMessage) then set this to 'false'. By default, it is also 'true' such that the Spring Integration Message payload will be converted into a JMS Message (e.g. String payload becomes a JMS TextMessage).
As with anything else, Gateway invocation might result in error. By default Producer will not be notified of the errors that might have occurred on the consumer side and will time out waiting for the reply. However there might be times when you want to communicate an error condition back to the consumer, in other words treat the Exception as a valid reply by mapping it to a Message. To accomplish this JMS Inbound Gateway provides support for a Message Channel to which errors can be sent for processing, potentially resulting in a reply Message payload that conforms to some contract defining what a caller may expect as an "error" reply. Such a channel can be configured via the error-channel attribute.
<int-jms:inbound-gateway request-destination="requestQueue" request-channel="jmsinputchannel" error-channel="errorTransformationChannel"/> <si:transformer input-channel="exceptionTransformationChannel" ref="exceptionTransformer" method="createErrorResponse"/>
You might notice that this example looks very similar to that included within Section 7.2.1, “GatewayProxyFactoryBean”. The same idea applies here: The exceptionTransformer could be a simple POJO that creates error response objects, you could reference the "nullChannel" to suppress the errors, or you could leave 'error-channel' out to let the Exception propagate.
The outbound Gateway creates JMS Messages from Spring Integration Messages and then sends to a 'request-destination'. It will then handle the JMS reply Message either by using a selector to receive from the 'reply-destination' that you configure, or if no 'reply-destination' is provided, it will create JMS TemporaryQueues. Notice that the "reply-channel" is also provided.
<jms:outbound-gateway id="jmsOutGateway" request-destination="outQueue" request-channel="outboundJmsRequests" reply-channel="jmsReplies"/>
The 'outbound-gateway' payload extraction properties are inversely related to those of the 'inbound-gateway' (see the discussion above). That means that the 'extract-request-payload' property value applies to the Spring Integration Message that is being converted into a JMS Message to be sent as a request, and the 'extract-reply-payload' property value applies to the JMS Message that is received as a reply and then converted into a Spring Integration Message to be subsequently sent to the 'reply-channel' as shown in the example configuration above.
If you need to convert the message, all JMS adapters and gateways, allow you to
MessageConverter via message-converter attribute. Simply provide the
bean name of an instance of
MessageConverter that is available within the same
Also, to provide some consistency with Marshaller and Unmarshaller interfaces Spring provides
which you can configure with your own custom Marshallers and Unmarshallers
<int-jms:inbound-gateway request-destination="requestQueue" request-channel="inbound-gateway-channel" message-converter="marshallingMessageConverter"/> <bean id="marshallingMessageConverter" class="org.springframework.jms.support.converter.MarshallingMessageConverter"> <constructor-arg> <bean class="org.bar.SampleMarshaller"/> </constructor-arg> <constructor-arg> <bean class="org.bar.SampleUnmarshaller"/> </constructor-arg> </bean>
|Note, however, that when you provide your own MessageConverter instance, it will still be wrapped within the HeaderMappingMessageConverter. This means that the 'extract-request-payload' and 'extract-reply-payload' properties may effect what actual objects are passed to your converter. The HeaderMappingMessageConverter itself simply delegates to a target MessageConverter while also mapping the Spring Integration MessageHeaders to JMS Message properties and vice-versa.|
The Channel Adapters and Gateways featured above are all intended for applications that are integrating with other external systems. The inbound options assume that some other system is sending JMS Messages to the JMS Destination and the outbound options assume that some other system is receiving from the Destination. The other system may or may not be a Spring Integration application. Of course, when sending the Spring Integration Message instance as the body of the JMS Message itself (with the 'extract-payload' value set to false), it is assumed that the other system is based on Spring Integration. However, that is by no means a requirement. That flexibility is one of the benefits of using a Message-based integration option with the abstraction of "channels" or Destinations in the case of JMS.
There are cases where both the producer and consumer for a given JMS Destination are intended to be part of the same application, running within the same process. This could be accomplished by using a pair of inbound and outbound Channel Adapters. The problem with that approach is that two adapters are required even though conceptually the goal is to have a single Message Channel. A better option is supported as of Spring Integration version 2.0. Now it is possible to define a single "channel" when using the JMS namespace.
<jms:channel id="jmsChannel" queue="exampleQueue"/>
The channel in the above example will behave much like a normal <channel/> element from the main Spring Integration namespace. It can be referenced by both "input-channel" and "output-channel" attributes of any endpoint. The difference is that this channel is backed by a JMS Queue instance named "exampleQueue". This means that asynchronous messaging is possible between the producing and consuming endpoints, but unlike the simpler asynchronous Message Channels created by adding a <queue/> sub-element within a non-JMS <channel/> element, the Messages are not just stored in an in-memory queue. Instead those Messages are passed within a JMS Message body, and the full power of the underlying JMS provider is then available for that channel. Probably the most common rationale for using this alternative would be to take advantage of the persistence made available by the store and forward approach of JMS messaging. If configured properly, the JMS-backed Message Channel also supports transactions. In other words, a producer would not actually write to a transactional JMS-backed channel if its send operation is part of a transaction that rolls back. Likewise, a consumer would not physically remove a JMS Message from the channel if the reception of that Message is part of a transaction that rolls back. Note that the producer and consumer transactions are separate in such a scenario. This is significantly different than the propagation of a transactional context across the simple, synchronous <channel/> element that has no <queue/> sub-element.
Since the example above is referencing a JMS Queue instance, it will act as a point-to-point channel. If on the other hand, publish/subscribe behavior is needed, then a separate element can be used, and a JMS Topic can be referenced instead.
<jms:publish-subscribe-channel id="jmsChannel" topic="exampleTopic"/>
For either type of JMS-backed channel, the name of the destination may be provided instead of a reference.
<jms:channel id="jmsQueueChannel" queue-name="exampleQueueName"/> <jms:publish-subscribe-channel id="jmsTopicChannel" topic-name="exampleTopicName"/>
In the examples above, the Destination names would be resolved by Spring's default
DynamicDestinationResolver implementation, but any implementation of the
DestinationResolver interface could be provided. Also, the JMS
ConnectionFactory is a required property of the channel, but by default
the expected bean name would be "connectionFactory". The example below provides both a custom instance
for resolution of the JMS Destination names and a different name for the ConnectionFactory.
<jms:channel id="jmsChannel" queue-name="exampleQueueName" destination-resolver="customDestinationResolver" connection-factory="customConnectionFactory"/>
To experiment with these JMS adapters, check out JMS samples available in our new Samples Git repository available here: http://git.springsource.org/+spring-integration/spring-integration/samples . There are two samples included. One provides inbound and outbound Channel Adapters, and the other provides inbound and outbound Gateways. They are configured to run with an embedded ActiveMQ process, but the "common.xml" file can easily be modified to support either a different JMS provider or a standalone ActiveMQ process. In other words, you can split the configuration so that the inbound and outbound adapters are running in separate JVMs. If you have ActiveMQ installed, simply modify the "brokerURL" property within the configuration to use "tcp://localhost:61616" for example (instead of "vm://localhost"). Both of the samples accept input via stdin and then echo back to stdout. Look at the configuration to see how these messages are routed over JMS.