Programmers used to working with relational databases coming to the LDAP world often express surprise to the fact that there is no notion of transactions. It is not specified in the protocol, and thus no servers support it. Recognizing that this may be a major problem, Spring LDAP provides support for client-side, compensating transactions on LDAP resources.
LDAP transaction support is provided by ContextSourceTransactionManager
, a
PlatformTransactionManager
implementation that manages Spring transaction
support for LDAP operations. Along with its collaborators it keeps track of the LDAP operations
performed in a transaction, making record of the state before each operation and taking steps to
restore the initial state should the transaction need to be rolled back.
In addition to the actual transaction management, Spring LDAP transaction support also
makes sure that the same DirContext
instance will be used throughout the same transaction,
i.e. the DirContext
will not actually be closed until the transaction is finished,
allowing for more efficient resources usage.
modifyAttributes
followed by a rebind
), or
if transaction synchronization with a JDBC data source is not required (see below) there will be nothing to gain
by using the LDAP transaction support.
Configuring Spring LDAP transactions should look very familiar if you're used to configuring Spring transactions.
You will create a TransactionManager
instance and wrap your target object using a
TransactionProxyFactoryBean
. In addition to this, you will also need to wrap your
ContextSource
in a TransactionAwareContextSourceProxy
.
<beans> ... <bean id="contextSourceTarget" class="org.springframework.ldap.core.support.LdapContextSource"> <property name="url" value="ldap://localhost:389" /> <property name="base" value="dc=example,dc=com" /> <property name="userDn" value="cn=Manager" /> <property name="password" value="secret" /> </bean> <bean id="contextSource" class="org.springframework.ldap.transaction.compensating.manager.TransactionAwareContextSourceProxy"> <constructor-arg ref="contextSourceTarget" /> </bean> <bean id="ldapTemplate" class="org.springframework.ldap.core.LdapTemplate"> <constructor-arg ref="contextSource" /> </bean> <bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.ldap.transaction.compensating.manager.ContextSourceTransactionManager"> <property name="contextSource" ref="contextSource" /> </bean> <bean id="myDataAccessObjectTarget" class="com.example.MyDataAccessObject"> <property name="ldapTemplate" ref="ldapTemplate" /> </bean> <bean id="myDataAccessObject" class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="transactionManager" ref="transactionManager" /> <property name="target" ref="myDataAccessObjectTarget" /> <property name="transactionAttributes"> <props> <prop key="*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW</prop> </props> </property> </bean> ...
In a real world example you would probably apply the transactions on the service object level rather than the DAO level; the above serves as an example to demonstrate the general idea.
ContextSource
and DAO instances get ids with a
"Target" suffix. The beans you will actually refer to are the Proxies that are created
around the targets; contextSource
and myDataAccessObject
A common use case when working against LDAP is that some of the data is stored in the LDAP tree, but other data is stored in a relational database. In this case, transaction support becomes even more important, since the update of the different resources should be synchronized.
While actual XA transactions is not supported, support is provided to conceptually wrap JDBC and LDAP
access within the same transaction using the ContextSourceAndDataSourceTransactionManager
.
A DataSource
and a ContextSource
is supplied to the
ContextSourceAndDataSourceTransactionManager
, which will then manage the two transactions,
virtually as if they were one. When performing a commit, the LDAP part of the operation will always
be performed first, allowing both transactions to be rolled back should the LDAP commit fail. The JDBC
part of the transaction is managed exactly as in DataSourceTransactionManager
, except that
nested transactions is not supported.
Spring LDAP manages compensating transactions by making record of the state in the LDAP tree
before each modifying operation (bind
, unbind
, rebind
,
modifyAttributes
, and rename
).
This enables the system
to perform compensating operations should the transaction need to be rolled back. In many cases the
compensating operation is pretty straightforward. E.g. the compensating rollback operation for a
bind
operation will quite obviously be to unbind the entry. Other operations however require
a different, more complicated approach because of some particular characteristics of LDAP databases. Specifically,
it is not always possible to get the values of all Attributes
of an entry, making the above
strategy insufficient for e.g. an unbind
operation.
This is why each modifying operation performed within a Spring LDAP managed transaction is internally split up in four distinct operations - a recording operation, a preparation operation, a commit operation, and a rollback operation. The specifics for each LDAP operation is described in the table below:
Table 6.1.
LDAP Operation | Recording | Preparation | Commit | Rollback |
---|---|---|---|---|
bind | Make record of the DN of the entry to bind. | Bind the entry. | No operation. | Unbind the entry using the recorded DN. |
rename | Make record of the original and target DN. | Rename the entry. | No operation. | Rename the entry back to its original DN. |
unbind | Make record of the original DN and calculate a temporary DN. | Rename the entry to the temporary location. | Unbind the temporary entry. | Rename the entry from the temporary location back to its original DN. |
rebind | Make record of the original DN and the new Attributes , and calculate a temporary DN. | Rename the entry to a temporary location. | Bind the new Attributes at the original DN, and unbind the original entry
from its temporary location. | Rename the entry from the temporary location back to its original DN. |
modifyAttributes | Make record of the DN of the entry to modify and calculate compensating ModificationItem s
for the modifications to be done. | Perform the modifyAttributes operation. | No operation. | Perform a modifyAttributes operation using the calculated compensating
ModificationItem s. |
A more detailed description of the internal workings of the Spring LDAP transaction support is available in the javadocs.
TempEntryRenamingStrategy
supplied to the ContextSourceTransactionManager
. Two implementations are supplied with Spring LDAP,
but if specific behaviour is required a custom implementation can easily be implemented by the user. The
provided TempEntryRenamingStrategy
implementations are:
DefaultTempEntryRenamingStrategy
(the default). Adds a suffix to the least significant
part of the entry DN. E.g. for the DN cn=john doe, ou=users
, this strategy would return the
temporary DN cn=john doe_temp, ou=users
. The suffix is configurable using the tempSuffix
property
DifferentSubtreeTempEntryRenamingStrategy
. Takes the least significant part of the DN
and appends a subtree DN to this. This makes all temporary entries be placed at a specific location in the LDAP tree.
The temporary subtree DN is configured using the subtreeNode
property. E.g., if
subtreeNode
is ou=tempEntries
and the original DN of the entry is
cn=john doe, ou=users
, the temporary DN will be cn=john doe, ou=tempEntries
.
Note that the configured subtree node needs to be present in the LDAP tree.
DefaultTempEntryRenamingStrategy
will not work. E.g. if your are planning
to do recursive deletes you'll need to use DifferentSubtreeTempEntryRenamingStrategy
. This is because
the recursive delete operation actually consists of a depth-first delete of each node in the sub tree individually.
Since it is not allowed to rename an entry that has any children, and DefaultTempEntryRenamingStrategy
would
leave each node in the same subtree (with a different name) in stead of actually removing it, this operation would fail.
When in doubt, use DifferentSubtreeTempEntryRenamingStrategy
.