Version 2.4.3
Table of Contents
Many web applications require the same sequence of steps to execute in different contexts. Often these sequences are merely components of a larger task the user is trying to accomplish. Such a reusable sequence is called a flow.
Consider a typical shopping cart application. User registration, login, and cart checkout are all examples of flows that can be invoked from several places in this type of application.
Spring Web Flow is the module of Spring for implementing flows. The Web Flow engine plugs into the Spring Web MVC platform and provides declarative flow definition language. This reference guide shows you how to use and extend Spring Web Flow.
This guide covers all aspects of Spring Web Flow. It covers implementing flows in end-user applications and working with the feature set. It also covers extending the framework and the overall architectural model.
You can ask questions and interact on StackOverflow using the designated tags, see Spring at StackOverflow.
Report bugs and make requests using the Spring Issue Tracker.
Submit pull requests and work with the source code , see Web Flow on Github.
Each jar in the Web Flow distribution is available in the Maven Central Repository. This allows you to easily integrate Web Flow into your application if you are already using Maven as the build system for your web development project.
To access Web Flow jars from Maven Central, declare the following dependency in your pom (includes transitive dependencies "spring-binding" and "spring-js"):
<dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.webflow</groupId> <artifactId>spring-webflow</artifactId> <version>x.y.z.RELEASE</version> </dependency>
If using JavaServer Faces, declare the following dependency in your pom (includes transitive dependencies "spring-binding", "spring-webflow" and "spring-js"):
<dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.webflow</groupId> <artifactId>spring-faces</artifactId> <version>x.y.z.RELEASE</version> </dependency>
To access Spring Web Flow jars with Ivy, add the following repositories to your Ivy config:
<url name="com.springsource.repository.bundles.release"> <ivy pattern="http://repository.springsource.com/ivy/bundles/release/ [organisation]/[module]/[revision]/[artifact]-[revision].[ext]" /> <artifact pattern="http://repository.springsource.com/ivy/bundles/release/ [organisation]/[module]/[revision]/[artifact]-[revision].[ext]" /> </url> <url name="com.springsource.repository.bundles.external"> <ivy pattern="http://repository.springsource.com/ivy/bundles/external/ [organisation]/[module]/[revision]/[artifact]-[revision].[ext]" /> <artifact pattern="http://repository.springsource.com/ivy/bundles/external/ [organisation]/[module]/[revision]/[artifact]-[revision].[ext]" /> </url>
To access Spring Web Flow jars as well as 3rd party dependencies with Ivy, add the following repository to your Ivy config:
<url name="springsource-repository"> <ivy pattern="http://repo.spring.io/libs-release/[organization]/[module]/[revision]/[type]s/ivy-[revision].xml" /> <artifact pattern="http://repo.spring.io/libs-release/[organization]/[module]/[revision]/[type]s/[module](-[classifier])-[revision].[ext]" /> </url>
Then declare the following dependencies in your ivy.xml:
<dependency org="org.springframework.webflow" name="org.springframework.binding" rev="x.y.z.RELEASE" conf="compile->runtime" /> <dependency org="org.springframework.webflow" name="org.springframework.js" rev="x.y.z.RELEASE" conf="compile->runtime" /> <dependency org="org.springframework.webflow" name="org.springframework.webflow" rev="x.y.z.RELEASE" conf="compile->runtime" />
If using JavaServer Faces, declare the following dependency in your pom (also adds the above dependencies):
<dependency org="org.springframework.webflow" name="org.springframework.faces" rev="x.y.z.RELEASE" conf="compile->runtime" />
Nightly snapshots of Web Flow development branches are available using Maven. These snapshot builds are useful for testing out fixes you depend on in advance of the next release, and provide a convenient way for you to provide feedback about whether a fix meets your needs.
For milestones and snapshots you'll need to use the SpringSource repository. Add the following repository to your Maven pom.xml:
<repository> <id>springsource-repository</id> <name>Spring project snapshots, milestones, and releases</name> <url>http://repo.spring.io/snapshot</url> </repository>
Then declare the following dependencies:
<dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.webflow</groupId> <artifactId>spring-binding</artifactId> <version>x.y.z.BUILD-SNAPSHOT</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.webflow</groupId> <artifactId>spring-js</artifactId> <version>x.y.z.BUILD-SNAPSHOT</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.webflow</groupId> <artifactId>spring-webflow</artifactId> <version>x.y.z.BUILD-SNAPSHOT</version> </dependency>
And if using JavaServerFaces:
<dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.webflow</groupId> <artifactId>spring-faces</artifactId> <version>x.y.z.BUILD-SNAPSHOT</version> </dependency>
This release requires JDK 1.6.
Web Flow now supports a Java-based alternative for its system configuration. See the updated Chapter 10, System Setup.
Also see the booking-mvc and booking-faces samples that have been updated to use all Java config.
When a flow ends it can now redirect to a Spring MVC controller after saving attributes in Spring MVC's flash scope for the controller to access.
A flow definition can apply partial validation on the model through the validation-hints attribute supported on view state and transition elements.
The HibernateFlowExecutionListener
now supports Hibernate 4 in addition to Hibernate 3.
As of 2.4.3 the HibernateFlowExecutionListener
also works with Hibernate 5.
Java ServerFaces version 1.2 and earlier are no longer supported by Spring Web Flow, if you have not done so already you will need to upgrade to JSF 2.0 or above. In addition the Spring Faces components that were previously provided with JSF 1.2 for progressive AJAX enhancements have been removed in this release.
The internal Portlet integration introduced in Spring Web Flow 2.2 has been upgraded for JSF 2.0 compatibility.
Some of the more advanced JSF 2.0 features, such as partial state saving, are not supported in a Portlet environment, however, existing application can now upgrade to the minimum required JSF version.
Upgraded projects will need to ensure that the <faces:resources>
elements is
included as part of their Spring configuration.
This release deprecates Spring.js. The deprecation includes the entire
spring-js-resources module including Spring.js and
Spring-Dojo.js and the bundled Dojo and CSS Framework.
Also deprecated is the SpringJavascriptAjaxHandler
from the spring-js module. The rest of spring-js,
e.g. AjaxHandler
, AjaxTilesView
, will be
folded into spring-webflow in a future release.
OGNL support is now deprecated.
By default Web Flow does a client-side redirect upon entering every view state. That makes it impossible to embed a flow on a page or within a modal dialog and execute more than one view state without causing a full-page refresh. Web Flow now supports launching a flow in "embedded" mode. In this mode a flow can transition to other view states without a client-side redirect during Ajax requests. See Section 11.7, “Embedding A Flow On A Page” and Section 13.8, “Embedding a Flow On a Page”.
Support for the JSR-303 Bean Validation API is now available building on equivalent support available in Spring MVC. See Section 5.10, “Validating a model” for more details.
Starting with Web Flow 2.3 a flow managed PersistenceContext
is automatically extended (propagated) to sub-flows assuming the subflow also has the feature enabled as well.
See Section 7.3, “Flow Managed Persistence And Sub-Flows”.
Support for Portlet 2.0 resource requests has now been added enabling Ajax requests with partial rendering.
URLs for such requests can be prepared with the <portlet:resourceURL>
tag in JSP pages.
Server-side processing is similar to a combined an action and a render requests but combined in a single request.
Unlike a render request, the response from a resource request includes content from the target portlet only.
The <flow-execution-repository>
element now provides a conversation-manager attribute accepting a reference to a ConversationManager instance.
By default Web Flow does a client-side redirect when remaining in the same view state as long as the current request is not an Ajax request. This is useful after form validation failure. Hitting Refresh or Back won't result in browser warnings. Hence this behavior is usually desirable. However a new flow execution attribute makes it possible to disable it and that may also be necessary in some cases specific to JSF applications. See Section 13.9, “Redirect In Same State”.
The process for building the samples included with the distribution has been simplified. Maven can be used to build all samples in one step. Eclipse settings include source code references to simplify debugging.
Additional samples can be accessed as follows:
mkdir spring-samples cd spring-samples svn co https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-samples/webflow-primefaces-showcase cd webflow-primefaces-showcase mvn package # import into Eclipse
mkdir spring-samples cd spring-samples svn co https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-samples/webflow-showcase cd webflow-showcase mvn package # import into Eclipse
Building on 2.1, Spring Web Flow version 2.2 adds support for core JSF 2 features The following features that were not supported in 2.1 are now available: partial state saving, JSF 2 resource request, handling, and JSF 2 Ajax requests. At this point support for JSF 2 is considered comprehensive although not covering every JSF 2 feature -- excluded are mostly features that overlap with the core value Web Flow provides such as those relating to navigation and state management.
See Section 13.5, “Configuring Web Flow for use with JSF” for important configuration changes.
Note that partial state saving is only supported with Sun Mojarra 2.0.3 or later.
It is not yet supported with Apache MyFaces. This is due to the
fact MyFaces was not as easy to customize with regards to how component state is stored.
We will work with Apache MyFaces to provide this support. In the mean time you will need to use
the javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING
context parameter in web.xml
to disable partial state saving with Apache MyFaces.
The main Spring Travel sample demonstrating Spring Web Flow and JSF support is now built on JSF 2 and components from the PrimeFaces component library. Please check out the booking-faces sample in the distribution.
Additional samples can be found at the Spring Web Flow - Prime Faces Showcase, an SVN repository within the spring-samples repository. Use these commands to check out and build:
svn co https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-samples/webflow-primefaces-showcase cd webflow-primefaces-showcase mvn package
A new Spring Security tag library is available for use with with JSF 2.0 or with JSF 1.2 Facelets views. It provides an <authorize> tag as well as several EL functions. See Section 13.11, “Using the Spring Security Facelets Tag Library” for more details.
Starting with Spring 3.0.4, the Spring Framework includes a replacement for the ResourcesServlet. Please see the Spring Framework documentation for details on the custom mvc namespace, specifically the new "resources" element.
The bundled custom Dojo build is upgraded to version 1.5. It now includes dojox.
Note that applications are generally encouraged to prepare their own custom Dojo build for optimized performance depending on what parts of Dojo are commonly used together. For examples see the scripts used by Spring Web Flow to prepare its own custom Dojo build.
The spring-js
artifact has been split in two -- the new artifact
(spring-js-resources
) contains client side resource (.js, .css, etc.) while
the existing artifact (spring-js
) contains server-side Java code only.
Applications preparing their own custom Dojo build have an option now to
avoid including spring-js-resources
and put Spring.js
and
Spring-Dojo.js
directly under the root of their web application.
Bundled client resources (.js, .css, etc.)
have been moved to META-INF/web-resources
from their previous location
under META-INF
. This change is transparent for applications but will result
in simpler and safer configuration when using the new resource handling
mechanism available in Spring 3.0.4.
In previous versions of Spring Web Flow support for JSF Portlets relied on a Portlet Bridge for JSF implementation and was considered experimental. Spring Web Flow 2.2 adds support for JSF Portlets based on its own internal Portlet integration targeting Portlet API 2.0 and JSF 1.2 environments. See Section 14.6, “Using Portlets with JSF” for more details. The Spring Web Flow Travel JSF Portlets sample has been successfully tested on the Apache Pluto portal container.
This chapter begins the Users Section. It shows how to implement flows using the flow definition language. By the end of this chapter you should have a good understanding of language constructs, and be capable of authoring a flow definition.
A flow encapsulates a reusable sequence of steps that can execute in different contexts. Below is a Garrett Information Architecture diagram illustrating a reference to a flow that encapsulates the steps of a hotel booking process:
In Spring Web Flow, a flow consists of a series of steps called "states". Entering a state typically results in a view being displayed to the user. On that view, user events occur that are handled by the state. These events can trigger transitions to other states which result in view navigations.
The example below shows the structure of the book hotel flow referenced in the previous diagram:
Flows are authored by web application developers using a simple XML-based flow definition language. The next steps of this guide will walk you through the elements of this language.
Every flow begins with the following root element:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> </flow>
All states of the flow are defined within this element. The first state defined becomes the flow's starting point.
Use the view-state
element to define a step of the flow that renders a view:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" />
By convention, a view-state maps its id to a view template in the directory where the flow is located.
For example, the state above might render /WEB-INF/hotels/booking/enterBookingDetails.xhtml
if the flow itself was located in the /WEB-INF/hotels/booking
directory.
Use the transition
element to handle events that occur within a state:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="submit" to="reviewBooking" /> </view-state>
These transitions drive view navigations.
Use the end-state
element to define a flow outcome:
<end-state id="bookingCancelled" />
When a flow transitions to a end-state it terminates and the outcome is returned.
With the three elements view-state
, transition
, and end-state
, you can quickly express your view navigation logic.
Teams often do this before adding flow behaviors so they can focus on developing the user interface of the application with end users first.
Below is a sample flow that implements its view navigation logic using these elements:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="submit" to="reviewBooking" /> </view-state> <view-state id="reviewBooking"> <transition on="confirm" to="bookingConfirmed" /> <transition on="revise" to="enterBookingDetails" /> <transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" /> </view-state> <end-state id="bookingConfirmed" /> <end-state id="bookingCancelled" /> </flow>
Most flows need to express more than just view navigation logic. Typically they also need to invoke business services of the application or other actions.
Within a flow, there are several points where you can execute actions. These points are:
On flow start
On state entry
On view render
On transition execution
On state exit
On flow end
Actions are defined using a concise expression language. Spring Web Flow uses the Unified EL by default. The next few sections will cover the essential language elements for defining actions.
The action element you will use most often is the evaluate
element.
Use the evaluate
element to evaluate an expression at a point within your flow.
With this single tag you can invoke methods on Spring beans or any other flow variable.
For example:
<evaluate expression="entityManager.persist(booking)" />
If the expression returns a value, that value can be saved in the flow's data model called flowScope
:
<evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="flowScope.hotels" />
Now review the sample booking flow with actions added:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <input name="hotelId" /> <on-start> <evaluate expression="bookingService.createBooking(hotelId, currentUser.name)" result="flowScope.booking" /> </on-start> <view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="submit" to="reviewBooking" /> </view-state> <view-state id="reviewBooking"> <transition on="confirm" to="bookingConfirmed" /> <transition on="revise" to="enterBookingDetails" /> <transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" /> </view-state> <end-state id="bookingConfirmed" /> <end-state id="bookingCancelled" /> </flow>
This flow now creates a Booking object in flow scope when it starts. The id of the hotel to book is obtained from a flow input attribute.
Each flow has a well-defined input/output contract. Flows can be passed input attributes when they start, and can return output attributes when they end. In this respect, calling a flow is conceptually similar to calling a method with the following signature:
FlowOutcome flowId(Map<String, Object> inputAttributes);
... where a FlowOutcome
has the following signature:
public interface FlowOutcome { public String getName(); public Map<String, Object> getOutputAttributes(); }
Use the input
element to declare a flow input attribute:
<input name="hotelId" />
Input values are saved in flow scope under the name of the attribute.
For example, the input above would be saved under the name hotelId
.
Use the type
attribute to declare the input attribute's type:
<input name="hotelId" type="long" />
If an input value does not match the declared type, a type conversion will be attempted.
Use the value
attribute to specify an expression to assign the input value to:
<input name="hotelId" value="flowScope.myParameterObject.hotelId" />
If the expression's value type can be determined, that metadata will be used for type coersion if no type
attribute is specified.
Use the output
element to declare a flow output attribute.
Output attributes are declared within end-states that represent specific flow outcomes.
<end-state id="bookingConfirmed"> <output name="bookingId" /> </end-state>
Output values are obtained from flow scope under the name of the attribute.
For example, the output above would be assigned the value of the bookingId
variable.
Now review the sample booking flow with input/output mapping:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <input name="hotelId" /> <on-start> <evaluate expression="bookingService.createBooking(hotelId, currentUser.name)" result="flowScope.booking" /> </on-start> <view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="submit" to="reviewBooking" /> </view-state> <view-state id="reviewBooking"> <transition on="confirm" to="bookingConfirmed" /> <transition on="revise" to="enterBookingDetails" /> <transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" /> </view-state> <end-state id="bookingConfirmed" > <output name="bookingId" value="booking.id"/> </end-state> <end-state id="bookingCancelled" /> </flow>
The flow now accepts a hotelId
input attribute and returns a bookingId
output attribute
when a new booking is confirmed.
A flow may declare one or more instance variables.
These variables are allocated when the flow starts.
Any @Autowired
transient references the variable holds are also rewired when the flow resumes.
Web Flow can store variables in one of several scopes:
Flow scope gets allocated when a flow starts and destroyed when the flow ends. With the default implementation, any objects stored in flow scope need to be Serializable.
View scope gets allocated when a view-state
enters and destroyed when the state exits.
View scope is only referenceable from within a view-state
. With the
default implementation, any objects stored in view scope need to be Serializable.
Request scope gets allocated when a flow is called and destroyed when the flow returns.
Flash scope gets allocated when a flow starts, cleared after every view render, and destroyed when the flow ends. With the default implementation, any objects stored in flash scope need to be Serializable.
Conversation scope gets allocated when a top-level flow starts and destroyed when the top-level flow ends. Conversation scope is shared by a top-level flow and all of its subflows. With the default implementation, conversation scoped objects are stored in the HTTP session and should generally be Serializable to account for typical session replication.
The scope to use is often determined contextually, for example depending on where a variable is defined -- at the start of the flow definition (flow scope), inside a a view state (view scope), etc. In other cases, for example in EL expressions and Java code, it needs to be specified explicitly. Subsequent sections explain how this is done.
A flow may call another flow as a subflow. The flow will wait until the subflow returns, then respond to the subflow outcome.
Use the subflow-state
element to call another flow as a subflow:
<subflow-state id="addGuest" subflow="createGuest"> <transition on="guestCreated" to="reviewBooking"> <evaluate expression="booking.guests.add(currentEvent.attributes.guest)" /> </transition> <transition on="creationCancelled" to="reviewBooking" /> </subflow-state>
The above example calls the createGuest
flow, then waits for it to return.
When the flow returns with a guestCreated
outcome, the new guest is added to the booking's guest list.
Use the input
element to pass input to the subflow:
<subflow-state id="addGuest" subflow="createGuest"> <input name="booking" /> <transition to="reviewBooking" /> </subflow-state>
When a subflow completes, its end-state id is returned to the calling flow as the event to use to continue navigation.
The subflow can also create output attributes to which the calling flow can refer within an outcome transition as follows:
<transition on="guestCreated" to="reviewBooking"> <evaluate expression="booking.guests.add(currentEvent.attributes.guest)" /> </transition>
In the above example, guest
is the name of an output attribute returned by the guestCreated
outcome.
Now review the sample booking flow calling a subflow:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <input name="hotelId" /> <on-start> <evaluate expression="bookingService.createBooking(hotelId, currentUser.name)" result="flowScope.booking" /> </on-start> <view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="submit" to="reviewBooking" /> </view-state> <view-state id="reviewBooking"> <transition on="addGuest" to="addGuest" /> <transition on="confirm" to="bookingConfirmed" /> <transition on="revise" to="enterBookingDetails" /> <transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" /> </view-state> <subflow-state id="addGuest" subflow="createGuest"> <transition on="guestCreated" to="reviewBooking"> <evaluate expression="booking.guests.add(currentEvent.attributes.guest)" /> </transition> <transition on="creationCancelled" to="reviewBooking" /> </subflow-state> <end-state id="bookingConfirmed" > <output name="bookingId" value="booking.id" /> </end-state> <end-state id="bookingCancelled" /> </flow>
The flow now calls a createGuest
subflow to add a new guest to the guest list.
Web Flow uses EL to access its data model and to invoke actions. This chapter will familiarize you with EL syntax, configuration, and special EL variables you can reference from your flow definition.
EL is used for many things within a flow including:
Access client data such as declaring flow inputs or referencing request parameters.
Access data in Web Flow's RequestContext
such as flowScope
or currentEvent
.
Invoke methods on Spring-managed objects through actions.
Resolve expressions such as state transition criteria, subflow ids, and view names.
EL is also used to bind form parameters to model objects and reversely to render formatted form fields from the properties of a model object. That however does not apply when using Web Flow with JSF in which case the standard JSF component lifecyle applies.
An important concept to understand is there are two types of expressions in Web Flow: standard expressions and template expressions.
The first and most common type of expression is the standard expression.
Such expressions are evaluated directly by the EL and need not be enclosed in delimiters like #{}
.
For example:
<evaluate expression="searchCriteria.nextPage()" />
The expression above is a standard expression that invokes the nextPage
method on the searchCriteria
variable when evaluated.
If you attempt to enclose this expression in a special delimiter like #{}
you will get an IllegalArgumentException
.
In this context the delimiter is seen as redundant.
The only acceptable value for the expression
attribute is an single expression string.
The second type of expression is a template expression.
A template expression allows mixing of literal text with one or more standard expressions.
Each standard expression block is explicitly surrounded with the #{}
delimiters.
For example:
<view-state id="error" view="error-#{externalContext.locale}.xhtml" />
The expression above is a template expression.
The result of evaluation will be a string that concatenates literal text such as error-
and .xhtml
with the result of evaluating externalContext.locale
.
As you can see, explicit delimiters are necessary here to demarcate standard expression blocks within the template.
Note | |
---|---|
See the Web Flow XML schema for a complete listing of those XML attributes that accept standard expressions and those that accept template expressions. You can also use F2 in Eclipse (or equivalent shortcut in other IDEs) to access available documentation when typing out specific flow definition attributes. |
Starting with version 2.1 Web Flow uses the Spring Expression Language (Spring EL).
Spring EL was created to provide a single, well-supported expression language for use across all the products in the Spring portfolio.
It is distributed as a separate jar org.springframework.expression
in the Spring Framework.
Existing applications will need to remove dependencies on org.jboss.el
or org.ognl
and use org.springframework.expression
instead.
See the section below on EL Portability for other notes on upgrading.
In Web Flow 2.0 Unified EL was the default expression language with jboss-el
as the implementation.
Use of Unified EL also implies a dependency on el-api
although that is typically provided by your web container.
Tomcat 6 includes it, for example.
Spring EL is the default and recommended expression language to use.
However it is possible to replace it with Unified EL if you wish to do so.
You need the following Spring configuration to plug in the WebFlowELExpressionParser
to the flow-builder-services
:
<webflow:flow-builder-services expression-parser="expressionParser"/> <bean id="expressionParser" class="org.springframework.webflow.expression.el.WebFlowELExpressionParser"> <constructor-arg> <bean class="org.jboss.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl" /> </constructor-arg> </bean>
Note that if your application is registering custom converters it's important to ensure the WebFlowELExpressionParser is configured with the conversion service that has those custom converters.
<webflow:flow-builder-services expression-parser="expressionParser" conversion-service="conversionService"/> <bean id="expressionParser" class="org.springframework.webflow.expression.el.WebFlowELExpressionParser"> <constructor-arg> <bean class="org.jboss.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl" /> </constructor-arg> <property name="conversionService" ref="conversionService"/> </bean> <bean id="conversionService" class="somepackage.ApplicationConversionService"/>
Note | |
---|---|
OGNL support is deprecated as of Web Flow version 2.4. |
OGNL is the third supported expression language. OGNL is the EL most familiar to Web Flow version 1.0 users. Please refer to the OGNL language guide for specifics on its EL syntax. If you wish to use OGNL this is the Spring configuration necessary to plug it in:
<webflow:flow-builder-services expression-parser="expressionParser"/> <bean id="expressionParser" class="org.springframework.webflow.expression.WebFlowOgnlExpressionParser"/>
Note that if your application is registering custom converters it's important to ensure the WebFlowOgnlExpressionParser is configured with the conversion service that has those custom converters.
<webflow:flow-builder-services expression-parser="expressionParser" conversion-service="conversionService"/> <bean id="expressionParser" class="org.springframework.webflow.expression.WebFlowOgnlExpressionParser"> <property name="conversionService" ref="conversionService"/> </bean> <bean id="conversionService" class="somepackage.ApplicationConversionService"/>
In general, you will find Spring EL, Unified EL and OGNL to have a very similar syntax.
Note however there are some advantages to Spring EL. For example Spring EL is closely integrated with the type conversion of Spring 3 and that allows you to take full advantage of its features. Specifically the automatic detection of generic types as well as the use of formatting annotations is currently supported with Spring EL only.
There are some minor changes to keep in mind when upgrading to Spring EL from Unified EL or OGNL as follows:
Expressions deliniated with ${}
in flow definitions must be changed to #{}
.
Expressions testing the current event #{currentEvent == 'submit'}
must be changed to #{currentEvent.id == 'submit'}
.
Resolving properties such as #{currentUser.name}
may cause NullPointerException without any checks such as #{currentUser != null ? currentUser.name : null}
.
A much better alternative though is the safe navigation operator #{currentUser?.name}
.
For more information on Spring EL syntax please refer to the Language Reference section in the Spring Documentation.
There are several implicit variables you may reference from within a flow. These variables are discussed in this section.
Keep in mind this general rule. Variables referring to data scopes (flowScope, viewScope, requestScope, etc.) should only be used when assigning a new variable to one of the scopes.
For example when assigning the result of the call to bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)
to a new variable called "hotels" you must prefix it with a scope variable in order to let Web Flow know where you want it stored:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" ... > <var name="searchCriteria" class="org.springframework.webflow.samples.booking.SearchCriteria" /> <view-state id="reviewHotels"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" /> </on-render> </view-state> </flow>
However when setting an existing variable such as "searchCriteria" in the example below, you reference the variable directly without prefixing it with any scope variables:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" ... > <var name="searchCriteria" class="org.springframework.webflow.samples.booking.SearchCriteria" /> <view-state id="reviewHotels"> <transition on="sort"> <set name="searchCriteria.sortBy" value="requestParameters.sortBy" /> </transition> </view-state> </flow>
The following is the list of implicit variables you can reference within a flow definition:
Use flowScope
to assign a flow variable.
Flow scope gets allocated when a flow starts and destroyed when the flow ends. With the default
implementation, any objects stored in flow scope need to be Serializable.
<evaluate expression="searchService.findHotel(hotelId)" result="flowScope.hotel" />
Use viewScope
to assign a view variable.
View scope gets allocated when a view-state
enters and destroyed when the state exits.
View scope is only referenceable from within a view-state
. With the
default implementation, any objects stored in view scope need to be Serializable.
<on-render> <evaluate expression="searchService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render>
Use requestScope
to assign a request variable.
Request scope gets allocated when a flow is called and destroyed when the flow returns.
<set name="requestScope.hotelId" value="requestParameters.id" type="long" />
Use flashScope
to assign a flash variable.
Flash scope gets allocated when a flow starts, cleared after every view render, and destroyed when the
flow ends. With the default implementation, any objects stored in flash scope need to be Serializable.
<set name="flashScope.statusMessage" value="'Booking confirmed'" />
Use conversationScope
to assign a conversation variable.
Conversation scope gets allocated when a top-level flow starts and destroyed when the top-level flow ends.
Conversation scope is shared by a top-level flow and all of its subflows. With the default
implementation, conversation scoped objects are stored in the HTTP session and should generally be
Serializable to account for typical session replication.
<evaluate expression="searchService.findHotel(hotelId)" result="conversationScope.hotel" />
Use requestParameters
to access a client request parameter:
<set name="requestScope.hotelId" value="requestParameters.id" type="long" />
Use currentEvent
to access attributes of the current Event
:
<evaluate expression="booking.guests.add(currentEvent.attributes.guest)" />
Use currentUser
to access the authenticated Principal
:
<evaluate expression="bookingService.createBooking(hotelId, currentUser.name)" result="flowScope.booking" />
Use messageContext
to access a context for retrieving and creating flow execution messages, including error and success messages.
See the MessageContext
Javadocs for more information.
<evaluate expression="bookingValidator.validate(booking, messageContext)" />
Use resourceBundle
to access a message resource.
<set name="flashScope.successMessage" value="resourceBundle.successMessage" />
Use flowRequestContext
to access the RequestContext
API, which is a representation of the current flow request.
See the API Javadocs for more information.
Use flowExecutionContext
to access the FlowExecutionContext
API, which is a representation of the current flow state.
See the API Javadocs for more information.
Use flowExecutionUrl
to access the context-relative URI for the current flow execution view-state.
As mentioned earlier in this section when assigning a variable in one of the flow scopes, referencing that scope is required. For example:
<set name="requestScope.hotelId" value="requestParameters.id" type="long" />
When simply accessing a variable in one of the scopes, referencing the scope is optional. For example:
<evaluate expression="entityManager.persist(booking)" />
When no scope is specified, like in the use of booking
above, a scope searching algorithm is used.
The algorithm will look in request, flash, view, flow, and conversation scope for the variable.
If no such variable is found, an EvaluationException
will be thrown.
This chapter shows you how to use the view-state
element to render views within a flow.
Use the view-state
element to define a step of the flow that renders a view and waits for a user event to resume:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="submit" to="reviewBooking" /> </view-state>
By convention, a view-state maps its id to a view template in the directory where the flow is located.
For example, the state above might render /WEB-INF/hotels/booking/enterBookingDetails.xhtml
if the flow itself was located in the /WEB-INF/hotels/booking
directory.
Below is a sample directory structure showing views and other resources like message bundles co-located with their flow definition:
Use the view
attribute to specify the id of the view to render explicitly.
The view id may be a relative path to view resource in the flow's working directory:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" view="bookingDetails.xhtml">
The view id may be a absolute path to a view resource in the webapp root directory:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" view="/WEB-INF/hotels/booking/bookingDetails.xhtml">
With some view frameworks, such as Spring MVC's view framework, the view id may also be a logical identifier resolved by the framework:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" view="bookingDetails">
See the Spring MVC integration section for more information on how to integrate with the MVC ViewResolver
infrastructure.
A view-state allocates a new viewScope
when it enters.
This scope may be referenced within the view-state to assign variables that should live for the duration of the state.
This scope is useful for manipulating objects over a series of requests from the same view, often Ajax requests.
A view-state destroys its viewScope when it exits.
Use the var
tag to declare a view variable.
Like a flow variable, any @Autowired
references are automatically restored when the view state resumes.
<var name="searchCriteria" class="com.mycompany.myapp.hotels.SearchCriteria" />
Use the on-render
tag to assign a variable from an action result before the view renders:
<on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" /> </on-render>
Objects in view scope are often manipulated over a series of requests from the same view. The following example pages through a search results list. The list is updated in view scope before each render. Asynchronous event handlers modify the current data page, then request re-rendering of the search results fragment.
<view-state id="searchResults"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" /> </on-render> <transition on="next"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.nextPage()" /> <render fragments="searchResultsFragment" /> </transition> <transition on="previous"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.previousPage()" /> <render fragments="searchResultsFragment" /> </transition> </view-state>
Use the on-render
element to execute one or more actions before view rendering.
Render actions are executed on the initial render as well as any subsequent refreshes, including any partial re-renderings of the view.
<on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" /> </on-render>
Use the model
attribute to declare a model object the view binds to.
This attribute is typically used in conjunction with views that render data controls, such as forms.
It enables form data binding and validation behaviors to be driven from metadata on your model object.
The following example declares an enterBookingDetails
state manipulates the booking
model:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking">
The model may be an object in any accessible scope, such as flowScope
or viewScope
.
Specifying a model
triggers the following behavior when a view event occurs:
View-to-model binding. On view postback, user input values are bound to model object properties for you.
Model validation. After binding, if the model object requires validation that validation logic will be invoked.
For a flow event to be generated that can drive a view state transition, model binding must complete successfully. If model binding fails, the view is re-rendered to allow the user to revise their edits.
When request parameters are used to populate the model (commonly referred to as data binding), type conversion is required to parse String-based request parameter values before setting target model properties. Default type conversion is available for many common Java types such as numbers, primitives, enums, and Dates. Users also have the ability to register their own type conversion logic for user-defined types, and to override the default Converters.
Starting with version 2.1 Spring Web Flow uses the type conversion and formatting system introduced in Spring 3 for nearly all type conversion needs.
Previously Web Flow applications used a type conversion mechanism that was different from the one in Spring MVC, which relied on the java.beans.PropertyEditor
abstraction.
Spring 3 offers a modern type conversion alternative to PropertyEditors that was actually influenced by Web Flow's own type conversion system.
Hence Web Flow users should find it natural to work with the new Spring 3 type conversion.
Another obvious and very important benefit of this change is that a single type conversion mechanism can now be used across Spring MVC And Spring Web Flow.
What does this practically mean for existing applications?
Existing applications are likely registering their own converters of type org.springframework.binding.convert.converters.Converter
through a sub-class of DefaultConversionService
available in Spring Binding.
Those converters can continue to be registered as before.
They will be adapted as Spring 3 GenericConverter
types and registered with a Spring 3 org.springframework.core.convert.ConversionService
instance.
In other words existing converters will be invoked through Spring's type conversion service.
The only exception to this rule are named converters, which can be referenced from a binding
element in a view-state
:
public class ApplicationConversionService extends DefaultConversionService { public ApplicationConversionService() { addDefaultConverters(); addDefaultAliases(); addConverter("customConverter", new CustomConverter()); } }
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking"> <binder> <binding property="checkinDate" required="true" converter="customConverter" /> </binder> </view-state>
Named converters are not supported and cannot be used with the type conversion service available in Spring 3. Therefore such converters will not be adapted and will continue to work as before, i.e. will not involve the Spring 3 type conversion. However, this mechanism is deprecated and applications are encouraged to favor Spring 3 type conversion and formatting features.
Also note that the existing Spring Binding DefaultConversionService
no longer registers any default converters.
Instead Web Flow now relies on the default type converters and formatters in Spring 3.
In summary the Spring 3 type conversion and formatting is now used almost exclusively in Web Flow. Although existing applications will work without any changes, we encourage moving towards unifying the type conversion needs of Spring MVC and Spring Web Flow parts of applications.
In Spring MVC an instance of a FormattingConversionService
is created automatically through the custom MVC namespace:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd"> <mvc:annotation-driven/>
Internally that is done with the help of FormattingConversionServiceFactoryBean
, which registers a default set of converters and formatters.
You can customize the conversion service instance used in Spring MVC through the conversion-service
attribute:
<mvc:annotation-driven conversion-service="applicationConversionService" />
In Web Flow an instance of a Spring Binding DefaultConversionService
is created automatically, which does not register any converters.
Instead it delegates to a FormattingConversionService
instance for all type conversion needs.
By default this is not the same FormattingConversionService
instance as the one used in Spring 3.
However that won't make a practical difference until you start registering your own formatters.
The DefaultConversionService
used in Web Flow can be customized through the flow-builder-services element:
<webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" conversion-service="defaultConversionService" />
Connecting the dots in order to register your own formatters for use in both Spring MVC and in Spring Web Flow you can do the following. Create a class to register your custom formatters:
public class ApplicationConversionServiceFactoryBean extends FormattingConversionServiceFactoryBean { @Override protected void installFormatters(FormatterRegistry registry) { // ... } }
Configure it for use in Spring MVC:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd"> <mvc:annotation-driven conversion-service="applicationConversionService" /> <!-- Alternatively if you prefer annotations for DI: 1. Add @Component to the factory bean. 2. Add a component-scan element (from the context custom namespace) here. 3. Remove XML bean declaration below. --> <bean id="applicationConversionService" class="somepackage.ApplicationConversionServiceFactoryBean">
Connection the Web Flow DefaultConversionService
to the same "applicationConversionService" bean used in Spring MVC:
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices" ... /> <webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" conversion-service="defaultConversionService" ... /> <bean id="defaultConversionService" class="org.springframework.binding.convert.service.DefaultConversionService"> <constructor-arg ref="applicationConversionSevice"/> </bean>
Of course it is also possible to mix and match.
Register new Spring 3 Formatter
types through the "applicationConversionService".
Register existing Spring Binding Converter
types through the "defaultConversionService".
An important concept to understand is the difference between type converters and formatters.
Type converters in Spring 3, provided in org.springframework.core
, are for general-purpose type conversion between any two object types.
In addition to the most simple Converter
type, two other interfaces are ConverterFactory
and GenericConverter
.
Formatters in Spring 3, provided in org.springframework.context
, have the more specialized purpose of representing Objects as Strings.
The Formatter
interface extends the Printer
and Parser
interfaces for converting an Object to a String and turning a String into an Object.
Web developers will find the Formatter
interface most relevant because it fits the needs of web applications for type conversion.
Note | |
---|---|
An important point to be made is that Object-to-Object conversion is a generalization of the more specific Object-to-String conversion.
In fact in the end |
One of the best features of the new type conversion is the ability to use annotations for a better control over formatting in a concise manner.
Annotations can be placed on model attributes and on arguments of @Controller methods that are mapped to requests.
Out of the box Spring provides two annotations NumberFormat
and DateTimeFormat
but you can create your own and have them registered along with the associated formatting logic.
You can see examples of the DateTimeFormat
annotation in the Spring Travel and in the Petcare along with other samples in the Spring Samples repository.
The DateTimeFormat
annotation implies use of Joda Time.
If that is present on the classpath the use of this annotation is enabled automatically.
By default neither Spring MVC nor Web Flow register any other date formatters or converters.
Therefore it is important for applications to register a custom formatter to specify the default way for printing and parsing dates.
The DateTimeFormat
annotation on the other hand provides more fine-grained control where it is necessary to deviate from the default.
For more information on working with Spring 3 type conversion and formatting please refer to the relevant sections of the Spring documentation.
Use the bind
attribute to suppress model binding and validation for particular view events.
The following example suppresses binding when the cancel
event occurs:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking"> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking"> <transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" bind="false" /> </view-state>
Use the binder
element to configure the exact set of model bindings usable by the view.
This is particularly useful in a Spring MVC environment for restricting the set of "allowed fields" per view.
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking"> <binder> <binding property="creditCard" /> <binding property="creditCardName" /> <binding property="creditCardExpiryMonth" /> <binding property="creditCardExpiryYear" /> </binder> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking" /> <transition on="cancel" to="cancel" bind="false" /> </view-state>
If the binder element is not specified, all public properties of the model are eligible for binding by the view. With the binder element specified, only the explicitly configured bindings are allowed.
Each binding may also apply a converter to format the model property value for display in a custom manner. If no converter is specified, the default converter for the model property's type will be used.
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking"> <binder> <binding property="checkinDate" converter="shortDate" /> <binding property="checkoutDate" converter="shortDate" /> <binding property="creditCard" /> <binding property="creditCardName" /> <binding property="creditCardExpiryMonth" /> <binding property="creditCardExpiryYear" /> </binder> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking" /> <transition on="cancel" to="cancel" bind="false" /> </view-state>
In the example above, the shortDate
converter is bound to the
checkinDate
and checkoutDate
properties.
Custom converters may be registered with the application's ConversionService.
Each binding may also apply a required check that will generate a validation error if the user provided value is null on form postback:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking"> <binder> <binding property="checkinDate" converter="shortDate" required="true" /> <binding property="checkoutDate" converter="shortDate" required="true" /> <binding property="creditCard" required="true" /> <binding property="creditCardName" required="true" /> <binding property="creditCardExpiryMonth" required="true" /> <binding property="creditCardExpiryYear" required="true" /> </binder> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking"> <transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" bind="false" /> </view-state>
In the example above, all of the bindings are required. If one or more blank input values are bound, validation errors will be generated and the view will re-render with those errors.
Model validation is driven by constraints specified against a model object. Web Flow supports enforcing such constraints programatically as well as declaratively with JSR-303 Bean Validation annotations.
Web Flow provides built-in support for the JSR-303 Bean Validation API
building on equivalent support available in Spring MVC.
To enable JSR-303 validation configure the flow-builder-services with
Spring MVC's LocalValidatorFactoryBean
:
<webflow:flow-registry flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices" /> <webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" validator="validator" /> <bean id="validator" class="org.springframework.validation.beanvalidation.LocalValidatorFactoryBean" />
With the above in place, the configured validator will be applied to all model attributes after data binding.
Note that JSR-303 bean validation and validation by convention (explained in the next section) are not mutually exclusive. In other words Web Flow will apply all available validation mechanisms.
JSR-303 Bean Validation supports partial validation through validation groups. For example:
@NotNull @Size(min = 2, max = 30, groups = State1.class) private String name;
In a flow definition you can specify validation hints on a view state or on a transition and those will be resolved to validation groups. For example:
<view-state id="state1" model="myModel" validation-hints="'group1,group2'">
The validation-hints attribute is an expression
that in the above example resolves to a comma-delimited String consisting
of the hints "group1" and "group2". A ValidationHintResolver
is used to resolve these hints. The BeanValidationHintResolver
used by default tries to resolve these strings to Class-based bean validation
groups. To do that it looks for matching inner types in the model or its parent.
For example given org.example.MyModel
with inner types
Group1
and Group2
it is
sufficient to supply the simple type names, i.e. "group1" and "group2".
You can also provide fully qualified type names.
A hint with the value "default" has a special meaning and is translated
to the default validation group in Bean Validation
javax.validation.groups.Default
.
A custom ValidationHintResolver
can be configured if necessary through the validationHintResolver property
of the flow-builder-services element:
<webflow:flow-registry flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices" /> <webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" validator=".." validation-hint-resolver=".." />
There are two ways to perform model validation programatically.
The first is to implement validation logic in your model object.
The second is to implement an external Validator
.
Both ways provide you with a ValidationContext
to record error messages and access information about the current user.
Defining validation logic in your model object is the simplest way to validate its state.
Once such logic is structured according to Web Flow conventions, Web Flow will automatically invoke that logic during the view-state postback lifecycle.
Web Flow conventions have you structure model validation logic by view-state, allowing you to easily validate the subset of model properties that are editable on that view.
To do this, simply create a public method with the name validate${state}
, where ${state}
is the id of your view-state where you want validation to run.
For example:
public class Booking { private Date checkinDate; private Date checkoutDate; ... public void validateEnterBookingDetails(ValidationContext context) { MessageContext messages = context.getMessageContext(); if (checkinDate.before(today())) { messages.addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error().source("checkinDate"). defaultText("Check in date must be a future date").build()); } else if (!checkinDate.before(checkoutDate)) { messages.addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error().source("checkoutDate"). defaultText("Check out date must be later than check in date").build()); } } }
In the example above, when a transition is triggered in a enterBookingDetails
view-state that is editing a Booking
model,
Web Flow will invoke the validateEnterBookingDetails(ValidationContext)
method automatically unless validation has been suppressed for that transition.
An example of such a view-state is shown below:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails" model="booking"> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking"> </view-state>
Any number of validation methods are defined. Generally, a flow edits a model over a series of views. In that case, a validate method would be defined for each view-state where validation needs to run.
The second way is to define a separate object, called a Validator, which validates your model object.
To do this, first create a class whose name has the pattern ${model}Validator, where ${model}
is the capitialized form of the model expression, such as booking
.
Then define a public method with the name validate${state}
, where ${state}
is the id of your view-state, such as enterBookingDetails
.
The class should then be deployed as a Spring bean. Any number of validation methods can be defined.
For example:
@Component public class BookingValidator { public void validateEnterBookingDetails(Booking booking, ValidationContext context) { MessageContext messages = context.getMessageContext(); if (booking.getCheckinDate().before(today())) { messages.addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error().source("checkinDate"). defaultText("Check in date must be a future date").build()); } else if (!booking.getCheckinDate().before(booking.getCheckoutDate())) { messages.addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error().source("checkoutDate"). defaultText("Check out date must be later than check in date").build()); } } }
In the example above, when a transition is triggered in a enterBookingDetails
view-state that is editing a Booking
model,
Web Flow will invoke the validateEnterBookingDetails(Booking, ValidationContext)
method automatically unless validation has been suppressed for that transition.
A Validator can also accept a Spring MVC Errors
object, which is required for invoking existing Spring Validators.
Validators must be registered as Spring beans employing the naming convention ${model}Validator
to be detected and invoked automatically.
In the example above, Spring 2.5 classpath-scanning would detect the @Component
and automatically register it as a bean with the name bookingValidator
.
Then, anytime the booking
model needs to be validated, this bookingValidator
instance would be invoked for you.
A Validator class can also define a method called validate
not associated (by convention) with any specific view-state.
@Component public class BookingValidator { public void validate(Booking booking, ValidationContext context) { //... } }
In the above code sample the method validate
will be called every time a Model of type Booking
is validated (unless validation has been suppressed for that transition).
If needed the default method can also be called in addition to an existing state-specific method. Consider the following example:
@Component public class BookingValidator { public void validate(Booking booking, ValidationContext context) { //... } public void validateEnterBookingDetails(Booking booking, ValidationContext context) { //... } }
In above code sample the method validateEnterBookingDetails
will be called first.
The default validate
method will be called next.
A ValidationContext allows you to obtain a MessageContext
to record messages during validation.
It also exposes information about the current user, such as the signaled userEvent
and the current user's Principal
identity.
This information can be used to customize validation logic based on what button or link was activated in the UI, or who is authenticated.
See the API Javadocs for ValidationContext
for more information.
Use the validate
attribute to suppress model validation for particular view events:
<view-state id="chooseAmenities" model="booking"> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking"> <transition on="back" to="enterBookingDetails" validate="false" /> </view-state>
In this example, data binding will still occur on back
but validation will be suppressed.
Define one or more transition
elements to handle user events that may occur on the view.
A transition may take the user to another view, or it may simply execute an action and re-render the current view.
A transition may also request the rendering of parts of a view called "fragments" when handling an Ajax event.
Finally, "global" transitions that are shared across all views may also be defined.
Implementing view transitions is illustrated in the following sections.
A view-state transition can execute one or more actions before executing. These actions may return an error result to prevent the transition from exiting the current view-state. If an error result occurs, the view will re-render and should display an appropriate message to the user.
If the transition action invokes a plain Java method, the invoked method may return false to prevent the transition from executing. This technique can be used to handle exceptions thrown by service-layer methods. The example below invokes an action that calls a service and handles an exceptional situation:
<transition on="submit" to="bookingConfirmed"> <evaluate expression="bookingAction.makeBooking(booking, messageContext)" /> </transition>
public class BookingAction { public boolean makeBooking(Booking booking, MessageContext context) { try { bookingService.make(booking); return true; } catch (RoomNotAvailableException e) { context.addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error(). .defaultText("No room is available at this hotel").build()); return false; } } }
Note | |
---|---|
When there is more than one action defined on a transition, if one returns an error result the remaining actions in the set will not be executed. If you need to ensure one transition action's result cannot impact the execution of another, define a single transition action that invokes a method that encapsulates all the action logic. |
Use the flow's global-transitions
element to create transitions that apply across all views.
Global-transitions are often used to handle global menu links that are part of the layout.
<global-transitions> <transition on="login" to="login" /> <transition on="logout" to="logout" /> </global-transitions>
From a view-state, transitions without targets can also be defined. Such transitions are called "event handlers":
<transition on="event"> <!-- Handle event --> </transition>
These event handlers do not change the state of the flow. They simply execute their actions and re-render the current view or one or more fragments of the current view.
Use the render
element within a transition to request partial re-rendering of the current view after handling the event:
<transition on="next"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.nextPage()" /> <render fragments="searchResultsFragment" /> </transition>
The fragments attribute should reference the id(s) of the view element(s) you wish to re-render. Specify multiple elements to re-render by separating them with a comma delimiter.
Such partial rendering is often used with events signaled by Ajax to update a specific zone of the view.
Spring Web Flow's MessageContext
is an API for recording messages during the course of flow executions.
Plain text messages can be added to the context, as well as internationalized messages resolved by a Spring MessageSource
.
Messages are renderable by views and automatically survive flow execution redirects.
Three distinct message severities are provided: info
, warning
, and error
.
In addition, a convenient MessageBuilder
exists for fluently constructing messages.
MessageContext context = ... MessageBuilder builder = new MessageBuilder(); context.addMessage(builder.error().source("checkinDate") .defaultText("Check in date must be a future date").build()); context.addMessage(builder.warn().source("smoking") .defaultText("Smoking is bad for your health").build()); context.addMessage(builder.info() .defaultText("We have processed your reservation - thank you and enjoy your stay").build());
MessageContext context = ... MessageBuilder builder = new MessageBuilder(); context.addMessage(builder.error().source("checkinDate").code("checkinDate.notFuture").build()); context.addMessage(builder.warn().source("smoking").code("notHealthy") .resolvableArg("smoking").build()); context.addMessage(builder.info().code("reservationConfirmation").build());
Internationalized messages are defined in message bundles accessed by a Spring MessageSource
.
To create a flow-specific message bundle, simply define messages.properties
file(s) in your flow's directory.
Create a default messages.properties
file and a .properties file for each additional Locale
you need to support.
#messages.properties checkinDate=Check in date must be a future date notHealthy={0} is bad for your health reservationConfirmation=We have processed your reservation - thank you and enjoy your stay
From within a view or a flow, you may also access message resources using the resourceBundle
EL variable:
<h:outputText value="#{resourceBundle.reservationConfirmation}" />
There are several places where Web Flow itself will generate messages to display to the user. One important place this occurs is during view-to-model data binding. When a binding error occurs, such as a type conversion error, Web Flow will map that error to a message retrieved from your resource bundle automatically. To lookup the message to display, Web Flow tries resource keys that contain the binding error code and target property name.
As an example, consider a binding to a checkinDate
property of a Booking
object.
Suppose the user typed in a alphabetic string.
In this case, a type conversion error will be raised.
Web Flow will map the 'typeMismatch' error code to a message by first querying your resource bundle for a message with the following key:
booking.checkinDate.typeMismatch
The first part of the key is the model class's short name. The second part of the key is the property name. The third part is the error code. This allows for the lookup of a unique message to display to the user when a binding fails on a model property. Such a message might say:
booking.checkinDate.typeMismatch=The check in date must be in the format yyyy-mm-dd.
If no such resource key can be found of that form, a more generic key will be tried. This key is simply the error code. The field name of the property is provided as a message argument.
typeMismatch=The {0} field is of the wrong type.
Use the popup
attribute to render a view in a modal popup dialog:
<view-state id="changeSearchCriteria" view="enterSearchCriteria.xhtml" popup="true">
When using Web Flow with the Spring Javascript, no client side code is necessary for the popup to display. Web Flow will send a response to the client requesting a redirect to the view from a popup, and the client will honor the request.
By default, when you exit a view state and transition to a new view state, you can go back to the previous state using the browser back button.
These view state history policies are configurable on a per-transition basis by using the history
attribute.
Set the history attribute to discard
to prevent backtracking to a view:
<transition on="cancel" to="bookingCancelled" history="discard">
This chapter shows you how to use the action-state
element to control the execution of an action at a point within a flow.
It will also show how to use the decision-state
element to make a flow routing decision.
Finally, several examples of invoking actions from the various points possible within a flow will be discussed.
Use the action-state
element when you wish to invoke an action, then transition to another state based on the action's outcome:
<action-state id="moreAnswersNeeded"> <evaluate expression="interview.moreAnswersNeeded()" /> <transition on="yes" to="answerQuestions" /> <transition on="no" to="finish" /> </action-state>
The full example below illustrates a interview flow that uses the action-state above to determine if more answers are needed to complete the interview:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <on-start> <evaluate expression="interviewFactory.createInterview()" result="flowScope.interview" /> </on-start> <view-state id="answerQuestions" model="questionSet"> <on-entry> <evaluate expression="interview.getNextQuestionSet()" result="viewScope.questionSet" /> </on-entry> <transition on="submitAnswers" to="moreAnswersNeeded"> <evaluate expression="interview.recordAnswers(questionSet)" /> </transition> </view-state> <action-state id="moreAnswersNeeded"> <evaluate expression="interview.moreAnswersNeeded()" /> <transition on="yes" to="answerQuestions" /> <transition on="no" to="finish" /> </action-state> <end-state id="finish" /> </flow>
Use the decision-state
element as an alternative to the action-state to make a routing decision using a convenient if/else syntax.
The example below shows the moreAnswersNeeded
state above now implemented as a decision state instead of an action-state:
<decision-state id="moreAnswersNeeded"> <if test="interview.moreAnswersNeeded()" then="answerQuestions" else="finish" /> </decision-state>
Actions often invoke methods on plain Java objects. When called from action-states and decision-states, these method return values can be used to drive state transitions. Since transitions are triggered by events, a method return value must first be mapped to an Event object. The following table describes how common return value types are mapped to Event objects:
Table 6.1. Action method return value to event id mappings
Method return type | Mapped Event identifier expression |
---|---|
java.lang.String | the String value |
java.lang.Boolean | yes (for true), no (for false) |
java.lang.Enum | the Enum name |
any other type | success |
This is illustrated in the example action state below, which invokes a method that returns a boolean value:
<action-state id="moreAnswersNeeded"> <evaluate expression="interview.moreAnswersNeeded()" /> <transition on="yes" to="answerQuestions" /> <transition on="no" to="finish" /> </action-state>
While writing action code as POJO logic is the most common, there are several other action implementation options.
Sometimes you need to write action code that needs access to the flow context.
You can always invoke a POJO and pass it the flowRequestContext as an EL variable.
Alternatively, you may implement the Action
interface or extend from the MultiAction
base class.
These options provide stronger type safety when you have a natural coupling between your action code and Spring Web Flow APIs.
Examples of each of these approaches are shown below.
<evaluate expression="pojoAction.method(flowRequestContext)" />
public class PojoAction { public String method(RequestContext context) { ... } }
<evaluate expression="customAction" />
public class CustomAction implements Action { public Event execute(RequestContext context) { ... } }
Actions often invoke services that encapsulate complex business logic. These services may throw business exceptions that the action code should handle.
The following example invokes an action that catches a business exception, adds a error message to the context, and returns a result event identifier. The result is treated as a flow event which the calling flow can then respond to.
<evaluate expression="bookingAction.makeBooking(booking, flowRequestContext)" />
public class BookingAction { public String makeBooking(Booking booking, RequestContext context) { try { BookingConfirmation confirmation = bookingService.make(booking); context.getFlowScope().put("confirmation", confirmation); return "success"; } catch (RoomNotAvailableException e) { context.addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error(). .defaultText("No room is available at this hotel").build()); return "error"; } } }
The following example is functionally equivlant to the last, but implemented as a MultiAction instead of a POJO action.
The MultiAction requires its action methods to be of the signature Event ${methodName}(RequestContext)
, providing stronger type safety, while a POJO action allows for more freedom.
<evaluate expression="bookingAction.makeBooking" />
public class BookingAction extends MultiAction { public Event makeBooking(RequestContext context) { try { Booking booking = (Booking) context.getFlowScope().get("booking"); BookingConfirmation confirmation = bookingService.make(booking); context.getFlowScope().put("confirmation", confirmation); return success(); } catch (RoomNotAvailableException e) { context.getMessageContext().addMessage(new MessageBuilder().error(). .defaultText("No room is available at this hotel").build()); return error(); } } }
In general it is recommended to catch exceptions in actions and return result
events that drive standard transitions, it is also possible to add an
exception-handler
sub-element to any state type with a
bean
attribute referencing a bean of type
FlowExecutionExceptionHandler
. This is an advanced
option that if used incorrectly can leave the flow execution in an invalid state.
Consider the build-in TransitionExecutingFlowExecutionExceptionHandler
as example of a correct implementation.
The following example shows an action that creates a new Booking object by invoking a method on a service:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <input name="hotelId" /> <on-start> <evaluate expression="bookingService.createBooking(hotelId, currentUser.name)" result="flowScope.booking" /> </on-start> </flow>
The following example shows a state entry action that sets the special fragments
variable that causes the view-state to render a partial fragment of its view:
<view-state id="changeSearchCriteria" view="enterSearchCriteria.xhtml" popup="true"> <on-entry> <render fragments="hotelSearchForm" /> </on-entry> </view-state>
The following example shows a state exit action that releases a lock on a record being edited:
<view-state id="editOrder"> <on-entry> <evaluate expression="orderService.selectForUpdate(orderId, currentUser)" result="viewScope.order" /> </on-entry> <transition on="save" to="finish"> <evaluate expression="orderService.update(order, currentUser)" /> </transition> <on-exit> <evaluate expression="orderService.releaseLock(order, currentUser)" /> </on-exit> </view-state>
The following example shows the equivalent object locking behavior using flow start and end actions:
<flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <input name="orderId" /> <on-start> <evaluate expression="orderService.selectForUpdate(orderId, currentUser)" result="flowScope.order" /> </on-start> <view-state id="editOrder"> <transition on="save" to="finish"> <evaluate expression="orderService.update(order, currentUser)" /> </transition> </view-state> <on-end> <evaluate expression="orderService.releaseLock(order, currentUser)" /> </on-end> </flow>
The following example shows a render action that loads a list of hotels to display before the view is rendered:
<view-state id="reviewHotels"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render> <transition on="select" to="reviewHotel"> <set name="flowScope.hotel" value="hotels.selectedRow" /> </transition> </view-state>
The following example shows a transition action adds a subflow outcome event attribute to a collection:
<subflow-state id="addGuest" subflow="createGuest"> <transition on="guestCreated" to="reviewBooking"> <evaluate expression="booking.guestList.add(currentEvent.attributes.newGuest)" /> </transition> </subfow-state>
The following example shows how to execute a chain of actions in an action-state. The name of each action becomes a qualifier for the action's result event.
<action-state id="doTwoThings"> <evaluate expression="service.thingOne()"> <attribute name="name" value="thingOne" /> </evaluate> <evaluate expression="service.thingTwo()"> <attribute name="name" value="thingTwo" /> </evaluate> <transition on="thingTwo.success" to="showResults" /> </action-state>
In this example, the flow will transition to showResults
when thingTwo
completes successfully.
Sometimes an Action needs to stream a custom response back to the client. An example might be a flow that renders a PDF document when handling a print event. This can be achieved by having the action stream the content then record "Response Complete" status on the ExternalContext. The responseComplete flag tells the pausing view-state not to render the response because another object has taken care of it.
<view-state id="reviewItinerary"> <transition on="print"> <evaluate expression="printBoardingPassAction" /> </transition> </view-state>
public class PrintBoardingPassAction extends AbstractAction { public Event doExecute(RequestContext context) { // stream PDF content here... // - Access HttpServletResponse by calling context.getExternalContext().getNativeResponse(); // - Mark response complete by calling context.getExternalContext().recordResponseComplete(); return success(); } }
In this example, when the print event is raised the flow will call the printBoardingPassAction. The action will render the PDF then mark the response as complete.
Another common task is to use Web Flow to handle multipart file uploads in combination with Spring MVC's
MultipartResolver
. Once the resolver is set up correctly as described here and the submitting
HTML form is configured with enctype="multipart/form-data"
, you can easily handle the file upload in a
transition action.
Note | |
---|---|
The file upload example below below is not relevant when using Web Flow with JSF. See Section 13.10, “Handling File Uploads with JSF” for details of how to upload files using JSF. |
Given a form such as:
<form:form modelAttribute="fileUploadHandler" enctype="multipart/form-data"> Select file: <input type="file" name="file"/> <input type="submit" name="_eventId_upload" value="Upload" /> </form:form>
and a backing object for handling the upload such as:
package org.springframework.webflow.samples.booking; import org.springframework.web.multipart.MultipartFile; public class FileUploadHandler { private transient MultipartFile file; public void processFile() { //Do something with the MultipartFile here } public void setFile(MultipartFile file) { this.file = file; } }
you can process the upload using a transition action as in the following example:
<view-state id="uploadFile" model="uploadFileHandler"> <var name="fileUploadHandler" class="org.springframework.webflow.samples.booking.FileUploadHandler" /> <transition on="upload" to="finish" > <evaluate expression="fileUploadHandler.processFile()"/> </transition> <transition on="cancel" to="finish" bind="false"/> </view-state>
The MultipartFile
will be bound to the FileUploadHandler
bean as
part of the normal form binding process so that it will be available to process during the
execution of the transition action.
Most applications access data in some way. Many modify data shared by multiple users and therefore require transactional data access properties. They often transform relational data sets into domain objects to support application processing. Web Flow offers "flow managed persistence" where a flow can create, commit, and close a object persistence context for you. Web Flow integrates both Hibernate and JPA object persistence technologies.
Apart from flow-managed persistence, there is the pattern of fully encapsulating PersistenceContext management within the service layer of your application. In that case, the web layer does not get involved with persistence, instead it works entirely with detached objects that are passed to and returned by your service layer. This chapter will focus on the flow-managed persistence, exploring how and when to use this feature.
This pattern creates a PersistenceContext
in flowScope
on flow startup,
uses that context for data access during the course of flow execution, and commits changes made to persistent entities at the end.
This pattern provides isolation of intermediate edits by only committing changes to the database at the end of flow execution.
This pattern is often used in conjunction with an optimistic locking strategy to protect the integrity of data modified in parallel by multiple users.
To support saving and restarting the progress of a flow over an extended period of time, a durable store for flow state must be used.
If a save and restart capability is not required, standard HTTP session-based storage of flow state is sufficient.
In that case, session expiration or termination before commit could potentially result in changes being lost.
To use the FlowScoped PersistenceContext pattern, first mark your flow as a persistence-context
:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <flow xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow/spring-webflow-2.0.xsd"> <persistence-context /> </flow>
Then configure the correct FlowExecutionListener
to apply this pattern to your flow.
If using Hibernate, register the HibernateFlowExecutionListener
. If using JPA, register the JpaFlowExecutionListener
.
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor" flow-registry="flowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-execution-listeners> <webflow:listener ref="jpaFlowExecutionListener" /> </webflow:flow-execution-listeners> </webflow:flow-executor> <bean id="jpaFlowExecutionListener" class="org.springframework.webflow.persistence.JpaFlowExecutionListener"> <constructor-arg ref="entityManagerFactory" /> <constructor-arg ref="transactionManager" /> </bean>
To trigger a commit at the end, annotate your end-state with the commit attribute:
<end-state id="bookingConfirmed" commit="true" />
That is it. When your flow starts, the listener will handle allocating a new EntityManager
in flowScope
.
Reference this EntityManager at anytime from within your flow by using the special persistenceContext
variable.
In addition, any data access that occurs using a Spring managed data access object will use this EntityManager automatically.
Such data access operations should always execute non transactionally or in read-only transactions to maintain isolation of intermediate edits.
A flow managed PersistenceContext
is automatically extended
(propagated) to subflows assuming the subflow also has the <perstistence-context/>
variable. When a subflow re-uses the PersistenceContext
started by its parent it ignores
commit flags when an end state is reached thereby deferring the final decision (to commit or not) to
its parent.
Security is an important concept for any application. End users should not be able to access any portion of a site simply by guessing the URL. Areas of a site that are sensitive must ensure that only authorized requests are processed. Spring Security is a proven security platform that can integrate with your application at multiple levels. This section will focus on securing flow execution.
Securing flow execution is a three step process:
Configure Spring Security with authentication and authorization rules
Annotate the flow definition with the secured element to define the security rules
Add the SecurityFlowExecutionListener to process the security rules.
Each of these steps must be completed or else flow security rules will not be applied.
The secured element designates that its containing element should apply the authorization check before fully entering. This may not occur more then once per stage of the flow execution that is secured.
Three phases of flow execution can be secured: flows, states and transitions. In each case the syntax for the secured element is identical. The secured element is located inside the element it is securing. For example, to secure a state the secured element occurs directly inside that state:
<view-state id="secured-view"> <secured attributes="ROLE_USER" /> ... </view-state>
The attributes
attribute is a comma separated list of Spring Security authorization attributes.
Often, these are specific security roles.
The attributes are compared against the user's granted attributes by a Spring Security access decision manager.
<secured attributes="ROLE_USER" />
By default, a role based access decision manager is used to determine if the user is allowed access. This will need to be overridden if your application is not using authorization roles.
There are two types of matching available: any
and all
.
Any, allows access if at least one of the required security attributes is granted to the user.
All, allows access only if each of the required security attributes are granted to the user.
<secured attributes="ROLE_USER, ROLE_ANONYMOUS" match="any" />
This attribute is optional.
If not defined, the default value is any
.
The match
attribute will only be respected if the default access decision manager is used.
Defining security rules in the flow by themselves will not protect the flow execution.
A SecurityFlowExecutionListener
must also be defined in the webflow configuration and applied to the flow executor.
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor" flow-registry="flowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-execution-listeners> <webflow:listener ref="securityFlowExecutionListener" /> </webflow:flow-execution-listeners> </webflow:flow-executor> <bean id="securityFlowExecutionListener" class="org.springframework.webflow.security.SecurityFlowExecutionListener" />
If access is denied to a portion of the application an AccessDeniedException
will be thrown.
This exception will later be caught by Spring Security and used to prompt the user to authenticate.
It is important that this exception be allowed to travel up the execution stack uninhibited, otherwise the end user may not be prompted to authenticate.
If your application is using authorities that are not role based, you will need to configure a custom AccessDecisionManager
.
You can override the default decision manager by setting the accessDecisionManager
property on the security listener.
Please consult the Spring Security reference documentation to learn more about decision managers.
<bean id="securityFlowExecutionListener" class="org.springframework.webflow.security.SecurityFlowExecutionListener"> <property name="accessDecisionManager" ref="myCustomAccessDecisionManager" /> </bean>
Spring Security has robust configuration options available. As every application and environment has its own security requirements, the Spring Security reference documentation is the best place to learn the available options.
Both the booking-faces
and booking-mvc
sample applications are configured to use Spring Security.
Configuration is needed at both the Spring and web.xml levels.
The Spring configuration defines http
specifics (such as protected URLs and login/logout mechanics) and the authentication-provider
.
For the sample applications, a local authentication provider is configured.
<security:http auto-config="true"> <security:form-login login-page="/spring/login" login-processing-url="/spring/loginProcess" default-target-url="/spring/main" authentication-failure-url="/spring/login?login_error=1" /> <security:logout logout-url="/spring/logout" logout-success-url="/spring/logout-success" /> </security:http> <security:authentication-provider> <security:password-encoder hash="md5" /> <security:user-service> <security:user name="keith" password="417c7382b16c395bc25b5da1398cf076" authorities="ROLE_USER,ROLE_SUPERVISOR" /> <security:user name="erwin" password="12430911a8af075c6f41c6976af22b09" authorities="ROLE_USER,ROLE_SUPERVISOR" /> <security:user name="jeremy" password="57c6cbff0d421449be820763f03139eb" authorities="ROLE_USER" /> <security:user name="scott" password="942f2339bf50796de535a384f0d1af3e" authorities="ROLE_USER" /> </security:user-service> </security:authentication-provider>
In the web.xml
file, a filter
is defined to intercept all requests.
This filter will listen for login/logout requests and process them accordingly.
It will also catch AccesDeniedException
s and redirect the user to the login page.
<filter> <filter-name>springSecurityFilterChain</filter-name> <filter-class>org.springframework.web.filter.DelegatingFilterProxy</filter-class> </filter> <filter-mapping> <filter-name>springSecurityFilterChain</filter-name> <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern> </filter-mapping>
Flow inheritance allows one flow to inherit the configuration of another flow. Inheritance can occur at both the flow and state levels. A common use case is for a parent flow to define global transitions and exception handlers, then each child flow can inherit those settings.
In order for a parent flow to be found, it must be added to the flow-registry
just like any other flow.
Flow inheritance is similar to Java inheritance in that elements defined in a parent are exposed via the child, however, there are key differences.
A child flow cannot override an element from a parent flow. Similar elements between the parent and child flows will be merged. Unique elements in the parent flow will be added to the child.
A child flow can inherit from multiple parent flows. Java inheritance is limited to a single class.
Flow level inheritance is defined by the parent
attribute on the flow
element.
The attribute contains a comma separated list of flow identifiers to inherit from.
The child flow will inherit from each parent in the order it is listed adding elements and content to the resulting flow.
The resulting flow from the first merge will be considered the child in the second merge, and so on.
<flow parent="common-transitions, common-states">
State level inheritance is similar to flow level inheritance, except only one state inherits from the parent, instead of the entire flow.
Unlike flow inheritance, only a single parent is allowed. Additionally, the identifier of the flow state to inherit from must also be defined. The identifiers for the flow and the state within that flow are separated by a #.
The parent and child states must be of the same type. For instance a view-state cannot inherit from an end-state, only another view-state.
<view-state id="child-state" parent="parent-flow#parent-view-state">
Note | |
---|---|
The intent for flow-level inheritance is to define common states to be added to and shared among multiple flow definitions while the intent for state-level inheritance is to extend from and merge with a single parent state. Flow-level inheritance is a good fit for composition and multiple inheritance but at the state level you can still only inherit from a single parent state. |
Often parent flows are not designed to be executed directly.
In order to protect these flows from running, they can be marked as abstract
.
If an abstract flow attempts to run, a FlowBuilderException
will be thrown.
<flow abstract="true">
When a child flow inherits from it's parent, essentially what happens is that the parent and child are merged together to create a new flow. There are rules for every element in the Web Flow definition language that govern how that particular element is merged.
There are two types of elements: mergeable and non-mergeable. Mergeable elements will always attempt to merge together if the elements are similar. Non-mergeable elements in a parent or child flow will always be contained in the resulting flow intact. They will not be modified as part of the merge process.
Note | |
---|---|
Paths to external resources in the parent flow should be absolute. Relative paths will break when the two flows are merged unless the parent and child flow are in the same directory. Once merged, all relative paths in the parent flow will become relative to the child flow. |
If the elements are of the same type and their keyed attribute are identical, the content of the parent element will be merged with the child element. The merge algorithm will continue to merge each sub-element of the merging parent and child. Otherwise the parent element is added as a new element to the child.
In most cases, elements from a parent flow that are added will be added after elements in the child flow. Exceptions to this rule include action elements (evaluate, render and set) which will be added at the beginning. This allows for the results of parent actions to be used by child actions.
Mergeable elements are:
action-state: id
attribute: name
decision-state: id
end-state: id
flow: always merges
if: test
on-end: always merges
on-entry: always merges
on-exit: always merges
on-render: always merges
on-start: always merges
input: name
output: name
secured: attributes
subflow-state: id
transition: on and on-exception
view-state: id
This chapter shows you how to setup the Web Flow system for use in any web environment.
Web Flow provides dedicated configuration support for both Java and XML-based configuration.
To get started with XML based configuration declare the webflow config XML namespace:
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:webflow="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config/spring-webflow-config-2.4.xsd"> <!-- Setup Web Flow here --> </beans>
To get started with Java configuration extend
AbstractFlowConfiguration
in an
@Configuration
class:
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration; import org.springframework.webflow.config.AbstractFlowConfiguration; @Configuration public class WebFlowConfig extends AbstractFlowConfiguration { }
The next section shows the minimal configuration required to set up the Web Flow system in your application.
Register your flows in a FlowRegistry
in XML:
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry>
Register your flows in a FlowRegistry
in Java:
@Bean public FlowDefinitionRegistry flowRegistry() { return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml") .build(); }
Deploy a FlowExecutor, the central service for executing flows in XML:
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor" />
Deploy a FlowExecutor, the central service for executing flows in Java:
@Bean public FlowExecutor flowExecutor() { return getFlowExecutorBuilder(flowRegistry()).build(); }
See the Spring MVC and Spring Faces sections of this guide on how to integrate the Web Flow system with the MVC and JSF environment, respectively.
This section explores flow-registry configuration options.
Use the location
element to specify paths to flow definitions to register.
By default, flows will be assigned registry identifiers equal to their filenames minus
the file extension, unless a registry bath path is defined.
In XML:
<webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml" />
In Java:
return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml") .build();
Specify an id to assign a custom registry identifier to a flow in XML:
<webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml" id="bookHotel" />
Specify an id to assign a custom registry identifier to a flow in Java:
return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml", "bookHotel") .build();
Use the flow-definition-attributes
element to assign custom meta-attributes to a registered flow.
In XML:
<webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml"> <webflow:flow-definition-attributes> <webflow:attribute name="caption" value="Books a hotel" /> </webflow:flow-definition-attributes> </webflow:flow-location>
In Java:
Map<String, Object> attrs = ... ; return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml", null, attrs) .build();
Use the flow-location-patterns
element to register flows that match a specific resource location pattern:
In XML:
<webflow:flow-location-pattern value="/WEB-INF/flows/**/*-flow.xml" />
In Java:
return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .addFlowLocationPattern("/WEB-INF/flows/**/*-flow.xml") .build();
Use the base-path
attribute to define a base location for all flows in the application.
All flow locations are then relative to the base path.
The base path can be a resource path such as '/WEB-INF' or a location on the classpath like 'classpath:org/springframework/webflow/samples'.
In XML:
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" base-path="/WEB-INF"> <webflow:flow-location path="/hotels/booking/booking.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry>
In Java:
return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .setBasePath("/WEB-INF") .addFlowLocationPattern("/hotels/booking/booking.xml") .build();
With a base path defined, the algorithm that assigns flow identifiers changes slightly. Flows will now be assigned registry identifiers equal to the the path segment between their base path and file name. For example, if a flow definition is located at '/WEB-INF/hotels/booking/booking-flow.xml' and the base path is '/WEB-INF' the remaining path to this flow is 'hotels/booking' which becomes the flow id.
Directory per flow definition | |
---|---|
Recall it is a best practice to package each flow definition in a unique directory. This improves modularity, allowing dependent resources to be packaged with the flow definition. It also prevents two flows from having the same identifiers when using the convention. |
If no base path is not specified or if the flow definition is directly on the base path, flow id assignment from the filename (minus the extension) is used. For example, if a flow definition file is 'booking.xml', the flow identifier is simply 'booking'.
Location patterns are particularly powerful when combined with a registry base path. Instead of the flow identifiers becoming '*-flow', they will be based on the directory path. For example in XML:
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" base-path="/WEB-INF"> <webflow:flow-location-pattern value="/**/*-flow.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry>
In Java:
return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .setBasePath("/WEB-INF") .addFlowLocationPattern("/**/*-flow.xml") .build();
In the above example, suppose you had flows located in /user/login
, /user/registration
, /hotels/booking
, and /flights/booking
directories within WEB-INF
,
you'd end up with flow ids of user/login
, user/registration
, hotels/booking
, and flights/booking
, respectively.
Use the parent
attribute to link two flow registries together in a hierarchy.
When the child registry is queried, if it cannot find the requested flow it will delegate to its parent.
In XML:
<!-- my-system-config.xml --> <webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" parent="sharedFlowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry> <!-- shared-config.xml --> <webflow:flow-registry id="sharedFlowRegistry"> <!-- Global flows shared by several applications --> </webflow:flow-registry>
In Java:
@Configuration public class WebFlowConfig extends AbstractFlowConfiguration { @Autowired private SharedConfig sharedConfig; @Bean public FlowDefinitionRegistry flowRegistry() { return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .setParent(this.sharedConfig.sharedFlowRegistry()) .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml") .build(); } } @Configuration public class SharedConfig extends AbstractFlowConfiguration { @Bean public FlowDefinitionRegistry sharedFlowRegistry() { return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/shared.xml") .build(); } }
Use the flow-builder-services
attribute to customize the services and settings used to build flows in a flow-registry.
If no flow-builder-services tag is specified, the default service implementations are used.
When the tag is defined, you only need to reference the services you want to customize.
In XML:
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices"> <webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry> <webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" />
In Java:
@Bean public FlowDefinitionRegistry flowRegistry() { return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder(flowBuilderServices()) .addFlowLocation("/WEB-INF/flows/booking/booking.xml") .build(); } @Bean public FlowBuilderServices flowBuilderServices() { return getFlowBuilderServicesBuilder().build(); }
The configurable services are the conversion-service
, expression-parser
, and view-factory-creator
.
These services are configured by referencing custom beans you define.
For example in XML:
<webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" conversion-service="conversionService" expression-parser="expressionParser" view-factory-creator="viewFactoryCreator" /> <bean id="conversionService" class="..." /> <bean id="expressionParser" class="..." /> <bean id="viewFactoryCreator" class="..." />
In Java:
@Bean public FlowBuilderServices flowBuilderServices() { return getFlowBuilderServicesBuilder() .setConversionService(conversionService()) .setExpressionParser(expressionParser) .setViewFactoryCreator(mvcViewFactoryCreator()) .build(); } @Bean public ConversionService conversionService() { // ... } @Bean public ExpressionParser expressionParser() { // ... } @Bean public ViewFactoryCreator viewFactoryCreator() { // ... }
Use the conversion-service
attribute to customize the ConversionService
used by the Web Flow system.
Type conversion is used to convert from one type to another when required during flow execution such as when processing request parameters, invoking actions, and so on.
Many common object types such as numbers, classes, and enums are supported.
However you'll probably need to provide your own type conversion and formatting logic for custom data types.
Please read Section 5.7, “Performing type conversion” for important information on how to provide custom type conversion logic.
Use the expression-parser
attribute to customize the ExpressionParser
used by the Web Flow system.
The default ExpressionParser uses the Unified EL if available on the classpath, otherwise OGNL is used.
Use the view-factory-creator
attribute to customize the ViewFactoryCreator
used by the Web Flow system.
The default ViewFactoryCreator produces Spring MVC ViewFactories capable of rendering JSP, Velocity, and Freemarker views.
The configurable settings are development
.
These settings are global configuration attributes that can be applied during the flow construction process.
This section explores flow-executor configuration options.
Use the flow-execution-listeners
element to register listeners that observe the lifecycle
of flow executions. For example in XML:
<webflow:flow-execution-listeners> <webflow:listener ref="securityListener"/> <webflow:listener ref="persistenceListener"/> </webflow:flow-execution-listeners>
In Java:
@Bean public FlowExecutor flowExecutor() { return getFlowExecutorBuilder(flowRegistry()) .addFlowExecutionListener(securityListener()) .addFlowExecutionListener(persistenceListener()) .build(); }
You may also configure a listener to observe only certain flows. For example in XML:
<webflow:listener ref="securityListener" criteria="securedFlow1,securedFlow2"/>
In Java:
@Bean public FlowExecutor flowExecutor() { return getFlowExecutorBuilder(flowRegistry()) .addFlowExecutionListener(securityListener(), "securedFlow1,securedFlow2") .build(); }
Use the flow-execution-repository
element to tune flow execution persistence settings.
For example in XML:
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor" flow-registry="flowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-execution-repository max-executions="5" max-execution-snapshots="30" /> </webflow:flow-executor>
In Java:
@Bean public FlowExecutor flowExecutor() { return getFlowExecutorBuilder(flowRegistry()) .setMaxFlowExecutions(5) .setMaxFlowExecutionSnapshots(30) .build(); }
Tune the max-executions
attribute to place a cap on the number of flow executions that can be created per user session.
When the maximum number of executions is exceeded, the oldest execution is removed.
Note | |
---|---|
The |
Tune the max-execution-snapshots
attribute to place a cap on the number of history snapshots that can be taken per flow execution.
To disable snapshotting, set this value to 0. To enable an unlimited number of snapshots, set this value to -1.
Note | |
---|---|
History snapshots enable browser back button support. When snapshotting is disabled pressing the browser back button will not work. It will result in using an execution key that points to a snapshot that has not be recorded. |
This chapter shows how to integrate Web Flow into a Spring MVC web
application. The booking-mvc
sample application is a good
reference for Spring MVC with Web Flow. This application is a simplified
travel site that allows users to search for and book hotel rooms.
The first step to using Spring MVC is to configure the
DispatcherServlet
in web.xml
. You typically do
this once per web application.
The example below maps all requests that begin with
/spring/
to the DispatcherServlet. An init-param
is used to provide the contextConfigLocation
. This is the
configuration file for the web application.
<servlet> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class> <init-param> <param-name>contextConfigLocation</param-name> <param-value>/WEB-INF/web-application-config.xml</param-value> </init-param> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/spring/*</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
The DispatcherServlet
maps requests for application
resources to handlers. A flow is one type of handler.
The first step to dispatching requests to flows is to enable flow
handling within Spring MVC. To this, install the
FlowHandlerAdapter
:
<!-- Enables FlowHandler URL mapping --> <bean class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.servlet.FlowHandlerAdapter"> <property name="flowExecutor" ref="flowExecutor" /> </bean>
Once flow handling is enabled, the next step is to map specific
application resources to your flows. The simplest way to do this is to
define a FlowHandlerMapping
:
<!-- Maps request paths to flows in the flowRegistry; e.g. a path of /hotels/booking looks for a flow with id "hotels/booking" --> <bean class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.servlet.FlowHandlerMapping"> <property name="flowRegistry" ref="flowRegistry"/> <property name="order" value="0"/> </bean>
Configuring this mapping allows the Dispatcher to map application
resource paths to flows in a flow registry. For example, accessing the
resource path /hotels/booking
would result in a registry
query for the flow with id hotels/booking
. If a flow is
found with that id, that flow will handle the request. If no flow is
found, the next handler mapping in the Dispatcher's ordered chain will
be queried or a "noHandlerFound" response will be returned.
When a valid flow mapping is found, the
FlowHandlerAdapter
figures out whether to start a new
execution of that flow or resume an existing execution based on
information present the HTTP request. There are a number of defaults
related to starting and resuming flow executions the adapter
employs:
HTTP request parameters are made available in the input map of all starting flow executions.
When a flow execution ends without sending a final response, the default handler will attempt to start a new execution in the same request.
Unhandled exceptions are propagated to the Dispatcher unless the exception is a NoSuchFlowExecutionException. The default handler will attempt to recover from a NoSuchFlowExecutionException by starting over a new execution.
Consult the API documentation for FlowHandlerAdapter
for more information. You may override these defaults by subclassing or
by implementing your own FlowHandler, discussed in the next
section.
FlowHandler
is the extension point that can be used to
customize how flows are executed in a HTTP servlet environment. A
FlowHandler
is used by the FlowHandlerAdapter
and is responsible for:
Returning the id
of a flow definition to
execute
Creating the input to pass new executions of that flow as they are started
Handling outcomes returned by executions of that flow as they end
Handling any exceptions thrown by executions of that flow as they occur
These responsibilities are illustrated in the definition of the
org.springframework.mvc.servlet.FlowHandler
interface:
public interface FlowHandler { public String getFlowId(); public MutableAttributeMap createExecutionInputMap(HttpServletRequest request); public String handleExecutionOutcome(FlowExecutionOutcome outcome, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response); public String handleException(FlowException e, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response); }
To implement a FlowHandler, subclass
AbstractFlowHandler
. All these operations are optional, and
if not implemented the defaults will apply. You only need to override the
methods that you need. Specifically:
Override getFlowId(HttpServletRequest)
when the id
of your flow cannot be directly derived from the HTTP request. By
default, the id of the flow to execute is derived from the pathInfo
portion of the request URI. For example,
http://localhost/app/hotels/booking?hotelId=1
results in
a flow id of hotels/booking
by default.
Override
createExecutionInputMap(HttpServletRequest)
when you need
fine-grained control over extracting flow input parameters from the
HttpServletRequest. By default, all request parameters are treated as
flow input parameters.
Override handleExecutionOutcome
when you need to
handle specific flow execution outcomes in a custom manner. The
default behavior sends a redirect to the ended flow's URL to restart a
new execution of the flow.
Override handleException
when you need fine-grained
control over unhandled flow exceptions. The default behavior attempts
to restart the flow when a client attempts to access an ended or
expired flow execution. Any other exception is rethrown to the Spring
MVC ExceptionResolver infrastructure by default.
A common interaction pattern between Spring MVC And Web Flow is for a Flow to redirect to a @Controller when it ends. FlowHandlers allow this to be done without coupling the flow definition itself with a specific controller URL. An example FlowHandler that redirects to a Spring MVC Controller is shown below:
public class BookingFlowHandler extends AbstractFlowHandler { public String handleExecutionOutcome(FlowExecutionOutcome outcome, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) { if (outcome.getId().equals("bookingConfirmed")) { return "/booking/show?bookingId=" + outcome.getOutput().get("bookingId"); } else { return "/hotels/index"; } } }
Since this handler only needs to handle flow execution outcomes in
a custom manner, nothing else is overridden. The
bookingConfirmed
outcome will result in a redirect to show
the new booking. Any other outcome will redirect back to the hotels
index page.
To install a custom FlowHandler, simply deploy it as a bean. The bean name must match the id of the flow the handler should apply to.
<bean name="hotels/booking" class="org.springframework.webflow.samples.booking.BookingFlowHandler" />
With this configuration, accessing the resource
/hotels/booking
will launch the hotels/booking
flow using the custom BookingFlowHandler. When the booking flow ends,
the FlowHandler will process the flow execution outcome and redirect to
the appropriate controller.
A FlowHandler handling a FlowExecutionOutcome or FlowException
returns a String
to indicate the resource to redirect to
after handling. In the previous example, the
BookingFlowHandler
redirects to the
booking/show
resource URI for bookingConfirmed
outcomes, and the hotels/index
resource URI for all other
outcomes.
By default, returned resource locations are relative to the current servlet mapping. This allows for a flow handler to redirect to other Controllers in the application using relative paths. In addition, explicit redirect prefixes are supported for cases where more control is needed.
The explicit redirect prefixes supported are:
servletRelative:
- redirect to a resource
relative to the current servlet
contextRelative:
- redirect to a resource
relative to the current web application context path
serverRelative:
- redirect to a resource relative
to the server root
http://
or https://
- redirect to a
fully-qualified resource URI
These same redirect prefixes are also supported within a flow
definition when using the externalRedirect:
directive in
conjunction with a view-state or end-state; for example,
view="externalRedirect:http://springframework.org"
Web Flow 2 maps selected view identifiers to files located within
the flow's working directory unless otherwise specified. For existing
Spring MVC + Web Flow applications, an external ViewResolver
is likely already handling this mapping for you. Therefore, to continue
using that resolver and to avoid having to change how your existing flow
views are packaged, configure Web Flow as follows:
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices"> <webflow:location path="/WEB-INF/hotels/booking/booking.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry> <webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" view-factory-creator="mvcViewFactoryCreator"/> <bean id="mvcViewFactoryCreator" class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.builder.MvcViewFactoryCreator"> <property name="viewResolvers" ref="myExistingViewResolverToUseForFlows"/> </bean>
The MvcViewFactoryCreator is the factory that allows you to
configure how the Spring MVC view system is used inside Spring Web Flow.
Use it to configure existing ViewResolvers, as well as other services such
as a custom MessageCodesResolver. You may also enable data binding use
Spring MVC's native BeanWrapper by setting the
useSpringBinding
flag to true. This is an alternative to
using OGNL or the Unified EL for view-to-model data binding. See the
JavaDoc API of this class for more information.
When a flow enters a view-state it pauses, redirects the user to its execution URL, and waits for a user event to resume. Events are generally signaled by activating buttons, links, or other user interface commands. How events are decoded server-side is specific to the view technology in use. This section shows how to trigger events from HTML-based views generated by templating engines such as JSP, Velocity, or Freemarker.
The example below shows two buttons on the same form that signal
proceed
and cancel
events when clicked,
respectively.
<input type="submit" name="_eventId_proceed" value="Proceed" /> <input type="submit" name="_eventId_cancel" value="Cancel" />
When a button is pressed Web Flow finds a request parameter name
beginning with _eventId_
and treats the remaining substring
as the event id. So in this example, submitting
_eventId_proceed
becomes proceed
. This style
should be considered when there are several different events that can be
signaled from the same form.
The example below shows a form that signals the
proceed
event when submitted:
<input type="submit" value="Proceed" /> <input type="hidden" name="_eventId" value="proceed" />
Here, Web Flow simply detects the special _eventId
parameter and uses its value as the event id. This style should only be
considered when there is one event that can be signaled on the
form.
The example below shows a link that signals the
cancel
event when activated:
<a href="${flowExecutionUrl}&_eventId=cancel">Cancel</a>
Firing an event results in a HTTP request being sent back to the
server. On the server-side, the flow handles decoding the event from
within its current view-state. How this decoding process works is
specific to the view implementation. Recall a Spring MVC view
implementation simply looks for a request parameter named
_eventId
. If no _eventId
parameter is found,
the view will look for a parameter that starts with
_eventId_
and will use the remaining substring as the event
id. If neither cases exist, no flow event is triggered.
By default when a flow enters a view state, it executes a client-side redirect before rendering the view. This approach is known as POST-REDIRECT-GET. It has the advantage of separating the form processing for one view from the rendering of the next view. As a result the browser Back and Refresh buttons work seamlessly without causing any browser warnings.
Normally the client-side redirect is transparent from a user's perspective. However, there are situations where POST-REDIRECT-GET may not bring the same benefits. For example a flow may be embedded on a page and driven via Ajax requests refreshing only the area of the page that belongs to the flow. Not only is it unnecessary to use client-side redirects in this case, it is also not the desired behavior with regards to keeping the surrounding content of the page intact.
The Section 12.5, “Handling Ajax Requests” explains how to do partial rendering during Ajax requests. The focus of this section is to explain how to control flow execution redirect behavior during Ajax requests. To indicate a flow should execute in "page embedded" mode all you need to do is append an extra parameter when launching the flow:
/hotels/booking?mode=embedded
When launched in "page embedded" mode a flow will not issue flow execution redirects during Ajax requests. The mode=embedded parameter only needs to be passed when launching the flow. Your only other concern is to use Ajax requests and to render only the content required to update the portion of the page displaying the flow.
By default Web Flow does a client-side redirect upon entering every view state. However if you remain in the same view state -- for example a transition without a "to" attribute -- during an Ajax request there will not be a client-side redirect. This behavior should be quite familiar to Spring Web Flow 2 users. It is appropriate for a top-level flow that supports the browser back button while still taking advantage of Ajax and partial rendering for use cases where you remain in the same view such as form validation, paging trough search results, and others. However transitions to a new view state are always followed with a client-side redirect. That makes it impossible to embed a flow on a page or within a modal dialog and execute more than one view state without causing a full-page refresh. Hence if your use case requires embedding a flow you can launch it in "embedded" mode.
If you'd like to see examples of a flow embedded on a page and within a modal dialog please refer to the webflow-showcase project. You can check out the source code locally, build it as you would a Maven project, and import it into Eclipse:
cd some-directory svn co https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-samples/webflow-showcase cd webflow-showcase mvn package # import into Eclipse
Flow output can be automatically saved to MVC flash scope when an end-state
performs an internal redirect. This is particularly useful when displaying a summary
screen at the end of a flow. For backwards compatibility this feature is disabled by
default, to enable set saveOutputToFlashScopeOnRedirect
on your
FlowHandlerAdapter
to true
.
<!-- Enables FlowHandler URL mapping --> <bean class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.servlet.FlowHandlerAdapter"> <property name="flowExecutor" ref="flowExecutor" /> <property name="saveOutputToFlashScopeOnRedirect" value="true" /> </bean>
The following example will add confirmationNumber
to the MVC flash scope
before redirecting to the summary
screen.
<end-state id="finish" view="externalRedirect:summary"> <output name="confirmationNumber" value="booking.confirmationNumber" /> </end-state>
Spring Javascript (spring-js) is a lightweight abstraction over common JavaScript toolkits such as Dojo. It aims to provide a common client-side programming model for progressively enhancing a web page with rich widget behavior and Ajax remoting.
Use of the Spring JS API is demonstrated in the the Spring MVC + Web Flow version of the Spring Travel reference application.
Spring JS provides a generic ResourceServlet
to serve web resources such as JavaScript and CSS files from jar files,
as well as the webapp root directory.
This servlet provides a convenient way to serve Spring.js files to your pages.
To deploy this servlet, declare the following in web.xml
:
<!-- Serves static resource content from .jar files such as spring-js.jar --> <servlet> <servlet-name>Resource Servlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.js.resource.ResourceServlet</servlet-class> </servlet> <!-- Map all /resources requests to the Resource Servlet for handling --> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>Resource Servlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/resources/*</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
Note that starting with version 3.0.4, the Spring Framework includes
a replacement for the ResourceServlet
(see the
Spring Framework documentation).
With the new <mvc:resources> element resource requests (.js, .css) are handled by the
DispatcherSevlet
without the need for a separate ResourceServlet
.
Here is the relevant portion of the Spring MVC configuration in
the mvc-booking sample:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd"> <mvc:annotation-driven/> <mvc:resources mapping="/resources/**" location="/, classpath:/META-INF/web-resources/" /> ... </beans>
This incoming maps requests for /resources
to resources found under
/META-INF/web-resources
on the classpath. That's where Spring JavaScript resources
are bundled. However, you can modify the location attribute in the above configuration in order
to serve resources from any classpath or web application relative location.
Note that the full resource URL depends on how your DispatcherServlet is mapped. In the mvc-booking sample we've chosen to map it with the default servlet mapping '/':
<servlet> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
That means the full URL to load Spring.js
is /myapp/resources/spring/Spring.js
.
If your DispatcherServlet
was instead mapped to /main/*
then the full
URL would be /myapp/main/resources/spring/Spring.js
.
When using of the default servlet mapping it is also recommended to add this to your Spring MVC configuration, which ensures that any resource requests not handled by your Spring MVC mappings will be delegated back to the Servlet container.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd"> ... <mvc:default-servlet-handler /> </beans>
Spring JS is designed such that an implementation of its API can be built for any of the popular Javascript toolkits. The initial implementation of Spring.js builds on the Dojo toolkit.
Using Spring Javascript in a page requires including the underlying toolkit as normal,
the Spring.js
base interface file, and the Spring-(library implementation).js
file for the underlying toolkit.
As an example, the following includes obtain the Dojo implementation of Spring.js using the ResourceServlet
:
<script type="text/javascript" src="<c:url value="/resources/dojo/dojo.js" />"> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="<c:url value="/resources/spring/Spring.js" />"> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="<c:url value="/resources/spring/Spring-Dojo.js" />"> </script>
When using the widget system of an underlying library, typically you must also include some CSS resources to obtain the desired look and feel.
For the booking-mvc reference application, Dojo's tundra.css
is included:
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="<c:url value="/resources/dijit/themes/tundra/tundra.css" />" />
A central concept in Spring Javascript is the notion of applying decorations to existing DOM nodes.
This technique is used to progressively enhance a web page such that the page will still be functional in a less capable browser.
The addDecoration
method is used to apply decorations.
The following example illustrates enhancing a Spring MVC <form:input>
tag with rich suggestion behavior:
<form:input id="searchString" path="searchString"/> <script type="text/javascript"> Spring.addDecoration(new Spring.ElementDecoration({ elementId: "searchString", widgetType: "dijit.form.ValidationTextBox", widgetAttrs: { promptMessage : "Search hotels by name, address, city, or zip." }})); </script>
The ElementDecoration
is used to apply rich widget behavior to an existing DOM node.
This decoration type does not aim to completely hide the underlying toolkit, so the toolkit's native widget type and attributes are used directly.
This approach allows you to use a common decoration model to integrate any widget from the underlying toolkit in a consistent manner.
See the booking-mvc
reference application for more examples of applying decorations to do things from suggestions to client-side validation.
When using the ElementDecoration
to apply widgets that have rich validation behavior, a common need is to prevent the form from being submitted to the server until validation passes.
This can be done with the ValidateAllDecoration
:
<input type="submit" id="proceed" name="_eventId_proceed" value="Proceed" /> <script type="text/javascript"> Spring.addDecoration(new Spring.ValidateAllDecoration({ elementId:'proceed', event:'onclick' })); </script>
This decorates the "Proceed" button with a special onclick event handler that fires the client side validators and does not allow the form to submit until they pass successfully.
An AjaxEventDecoration
applies a client-side event listener that fires a remote Ajax request to the server. It also auto-registers a callback function to link in the response:
<a id="prevLink" href="search?searchString=${criteria.searchString}&page=${criteria.page - 1}">Previous</a> <script type="text/javascript"> Spring.addDecoration(new Spring.AjaxEventDecoration({ elementId: "prevLink", event: "onclick", params: { fragments: "body" } })); </script>
This decorates the onclick event of the "Previous Results" link with an Ajax call, passing along a special parameter that specifies the fragment to be re-rendered in the response. Note that this link would still be fully functional if Javascript was unavailable in the client. (See Section 12.5, “Handling Ajax Requests” for details on how this request is handled on the server.)
It is also possible to apply more than one decoration to an element. The following example shows a button being decorated with Ajax and validate-all submit suppression:
<input type="submit" id="proceed" name="_eventId_proceed" value="Proceed" /> <script type="text/javascript"> Spring.addDecoration(new Spring.ValidateAllDecoration({elementId:'proceed', event:'onclick'})); Spring.addDecoration(new Spring.AjaxEventDecoration({elementId:'proceed', event:'onclick',formId:'booking', params:{fragments:'messages'}})); </script>
It is also possible to apply a decoration to multiple elements in a single statement using Dojo's query API. The following example decorates a set of checkbox elements as Dojo Checkbox widgets:
<div id="amenities"> <form:checkbox path="amenities" value="OCEAN_VIEW" label="Ocean View" /></li> <form:checkbox path="amenities" value="LATE_CHECKOUT" label="Late Checkout" /></li> <form:checkbox path="amenities" value="MINIBAR" label="Minibar" /></li> <script type="text/javascript"> dojo.query("#amenities input[type='checkbox']").forEach(function(element) { Spring.addDecoration(new Spring.ElementDecoration({ elementId: element.id, widgetType : "dijit.form.CheckBox", widgetAttrs : { checked : element.checked } })); }); </script> </div>
Spring Javascript's client-side Ajax response handling is built upon the notion of receiving "fragments" back from the server. These fragments are just standard HTML that is meant to replace portions of the existing page. The key piece needed on the server is a way to determine which pieces of a full response need to be pulled out for partial rendering.
In order to be able to render partial fragments of a full response, the full response must be built using a templating technology that allows the use of composition for constructing the response, and for the member parts of the composition to be referenced and rendered individually. Spring Javascript provides some simple Spring MVC extensions that make use of Tiles to achieve this. The same technique could theoretically be used with any templating system supporting composition.
Spring Javascript's Ajax remoting functionality is built upon the notion that the core handling code for an Ajax request should not differ from a standard browser request, thus no special knowledge of an Ajax request is needed directly in the code and the same hanlder can be used for both styles of request.
The key interface for integrating various Ajax libraries with the Ajax-aware behavior of Web Flow (such as not redirecting for a
partial page update) is org.springframework.js.AjaxHandler
. A SpringJavascriptAjaxHandler
is configured by default that is able to
detect an Ajax request submitted via the Spring JS client-side API and can respond appropriately in the case where a redirect is required. In
order to integrate a different Ajax library (be it a pure JavaScript library, or a higher-level abstraction such as an Ajax-capable JSF
component library), a custom AjaxHandler
can be injected into the FlowHandlerAdapter
or FlowController
.
In order to handle Ajax requests with Spring MVC controllers, all that is needed is the configuration of the provided Spring MVC extensions in your Spring application context for rendering the partial response (note that these extensions require the use of Tiles for templating):
<bean id="tilesViewResolver" class="org.springframework.js.ajax.AjaxUrlBasedViewResolver"> <property name="viewClass" value="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.view.FlowAjaxTilesView"/> </bean>
This configures the AjaxUrlBasedViewResolver
which in turn interprets Ajax requests and creates FlowAjaxTilesView
objects to handle rendering of the appropriate fragments.
Note that FlowAjaxTilesView
is capable of handling the rendering for both Web Flow and pure Spring MVC requests.
The fragments correspond to individual attributes of a Tiles view definition. For example, take the following Tiles view definition:
<definition name="hotels/index" extends="standardLayout"> <put-attribute name="body" value="index.body" /> </definition> <definition name="index.body" template="/WEB-INF/hotels/index.jsp"> <put-attribute name="hotelSearchForm" value="/WEB-INF/hotels/hotelSearchForm.jsp" /> <put-attribute name="bookingsTable" value="/WEB-INF/hotels/bookingsTable.jsp" /> </definition>
An Ajax request could specify the "body", "hotelSearchForm" or "bookingsTable" to be rendered as fragments in the request.
Spring Web Flow handles the optional rendering of fragments directly in the flow definition language through use of the render
element.
The benefit of this approach is that the selection of fragments is completely decoupled from client-side code, such that no special parameters need to be passed with the request the way they
currently must be with the pure Spring MVC controller approach.
For example, if you wanted to render the "hotelSearchForm" fragment from the previous example Tiles view into a rich Javascript popup:
<view-state id="changeSearchCriteria" view="enterSearchCriteria.xhtml" popup="true"> <on-entry> <render fragments="hotelSearchForm" /> </on-entry> <transition on="search" to="reviewHotels"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.resetPage()"/> </transition> </view-state>
Spring Web Flow provides a JSF integration that simplifies using JSF with Spring. It lets you use the JSF UI Component Model with Spring MVC and Spring Web Flow controllers. Along with the JSF integration Spring Web Flow provides a Spring Security tag library for use in JSF environments (see Section 13.11, “Using the Spring Security Facelets Tag Library” for more details).
Starting with Spring Web Flow version 2.4, JSF integration requires JSF v2.0 or above. Both Sun Mojarra and Apache MyFaces runtime environments are supported.
Spring Web Flow also supports using JSF in a portlet environment. Spring Web Flow's portlet integration supports Portlets API 2.0. See Chapter 14, Portlet Integration for more on Spring Web Flow's portlet integration.
Spring Web Flow complements the strengths of JSF, its component model, and provides more sophisticated state management and navigation. In addition you have the ability to use Spring MVC @Controller or flow definitions as controllers in the web layer.
JSF applications using Spring Web Flow applications gain benefits in the following areas:
Managed bean facility
Scope management
Event handling
Navigation
Modularization and packaging of views
Cleaner URLs
Model-level validation
Using these features significantly reduce the amount of configuration required in faces-config.xml. They provide a cleaner separation between the view and controller layers along with better modularization of application functionals. These features are detailed in the sections to follow. The majority of these features build on the flow definition language of Spring Web Flow. Therefore it is assumed that you have an understanding of the foundations presented in Chapter 3, Defining Flows.
If you are upgrading from Spring Web Flow 2.3 or earlier you may need to update several aspects of your project. JSF 2.0 is now a minimum requirement and as result some components from previous releases are no longer included.
Previous releases of Spring Web Flow shipped with a component library
which provided Ajax and client-side validation capabilities for JSF 1.2
environments. Applications using these components will need to switch to a
3rd party JSF component library such as PrimeFaces or RichFaces.
Components that have been removed include <sf:clientTextValidator>
,
<sf:clientNumberValidator>
, <sf:clientDateValidator>
,
<sf:validateAllOnClick>
, <sf:resource>
and
<sf:resourceGroup>
.
The swf-booking-faces
sample in the Spring Web Flow distribution
shows an example built with PrimeFaces components.
If your application defines a faces-config.xml
file you should
ensure that the correct schema version is specified. In addition you should remove
any FaceletViewHandler
references as Facelets are now the default rendering
technology for JSF 2.0
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <faces-config xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_2_0.xsd" version="2.0"> </faces-config>
Previous releases of Spring Web Flow would often require additional configuration in order
for 3rd party component libraries to work correctly. JSF 2.0 introduced standard resource
loading mechanisms that removes the need for such custom configuration. As long as you
have a <faces:resources>
element in your Spring configuration, libraries
such as RichFaces or Apache Trinidad you should work.
If you have a previously configured /WEB-INF/springsecurity.taglib.xml
file
you may need to update the contents. See Section 13.11, “Using the Spring Security Facelets Tag Library” for
details.
The first step is to route requests to the
DispatcherServlet
in the web.xml
file. In this
example, we map all URLs that begin with /spring/
to the
servlet. The servlet needs to be configured. An init-param
is
used in the servlet to pass the contextConfigLocation
. This
is the location of the Spring configuration for your web
application.
<servlet> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class> <init-param> <param-name>contextConfigLocation</param-name> <param-value>/WEB-INF/web-application-config.xml</param-value> </init-param> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/spring/*</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
In order for JSF to bootstrap correctly, the
FacesServlet
must be configured in web.xml
as it
normally would even though you generally will not need to route requests
through it at all when using JSF with Spring Web Flow.
<!-- Just here so the JSF implementation can initialize, *not* used at runtime --> <servlet> <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> </servlet> <!-- Just here so the JSF implementation can initialize --> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>*.faces</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
The use of Facelets instead of JSP typically requires this in web.xml:
!-- Use JSF view templates saved as *.xhtml, for use with Facelets --> <context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name> <param-value>.xhtml</param-value> </context-param>
This section explains how to configure Web Flow with JSF. Both Java and XML style configuration are supported. The following is sample configuration for Web Flow and JSF in XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:webflow="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config" xmlns:faces="http://www.springframework.org/schema/faces" si:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config/spring-webflow-config-2.4.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/faces http://www.springframework.org/schema/faces/spring-faces-2.4.xsd"> <!-- Executes flows: the central entry point into the Spring Web Flow system --> <webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor"> <webflow:flow-execution-listeners> <webflow:listener ref="facesContextListener"/> </webflow:flow-execution-listeners> </webflow:flow-executor> <!-- The registry of executable flow definitions --> <webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices" base-path="/WEB-INF"> <webflow:flow-location-pattern value="**/*-flow.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry> <!-- Configures the Spring Web Flow JSF integration --> <faces:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" /> <!-- A listener maintain one FacesContext instance per Web Flow request. --> <bean id="facesContextListener" class="org.springframework.faces.webflow.FlowFacesContextLifecycleListener" /> </beans>
The following is an example of the same in Java configuration:
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration; import org.springframework.faces.config.*; @Configuration public class WebFlowConfig extends AbstractFacesFlowConfiguration { @Bean public FlowExecutor flowExecutor() { return getFlowExecutorBuilder(flowRegistry()) .addFlowExecutionListener(new FlowFacesContextLifecycleListener()) .build(); } @Bean public FlowDefinitionRegistry flowRegistry() { return getFlowDefinitionRegistryBuilder() .setBasePath("/WEB-INF") .addFlowLocationPattern("**/*-flow.xml").build(); }
The main points are the installation of a
FlowFacesContextLifecycleListener
that manages a single
FacesContext for the duration of Web Flow request and the use of the
flow-builder-services
element from the faces
custom namespace to configure rendering for a JSF environment.
In a JSF environment you'll also need this Spring MVC related configuration:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:faces="http://www.springframework.org/schema/faces" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/faces http://www.springframework.org/schema/faces/spring-faces-2.4.xsd"> <faces:resources /> <bean class="org.springframework.faces.webflow.JsfFlowHandlerAdapter"> <property name="flowExecutor" ref="flowExecutor" /> </bean> </beans>
The resources
custom namespace element delegates JSF
resource requests to the JSF resource API. The
JsfFlowHandlerAdapter
is a replacement for the
FlowHandlerAdapter
normally used with Web Flow. This adapter
initializes itself with a JsfAjaxHandler
instead of the
SpringJavaSciprtAjaxHandler
.
When using Java config, the AbstractFacesFlowConfiguration
base class automatically registers JsfResourceRequestHandler
so there is nothing further to do.
When using JSF with Spring Web Flow you can completely replace the JSF managed bean facility with a combination of Web Flow managed variables and Spring managed beans. It gives you a good deal more control over the lifecycle of your managed objects with well-defined hooks for initialization and execution of your domain model. Additionally, since you are presumably already using Spring for your business layer, it reduces the conceptual overhead of having to maintain two different managed bean models.
In doing pure JSF development, you will quickly find that request scope is not long-lived enough for storing conversational model objects that drive complex event-driven views. In JSF the usual option is to begin putting things into session scope, with the extra burden of needing to clean the objects up before progressing to another view or functional area of the application. What is really needed is a managed scope that is somewhere between request and session scope. JSF provides flash and view scopes that can be accessed programmatically via UIViewRoot.getViewMap(). Spring Web Flow provides access to flash, view, flow, and conversation scopes. These scopes are seamlessly integrated through JSF variable resolvers and work the same in all JSF applications.
The easiest and most natural way to declare and manage the model is through the use of flow variables. You can declare these variables at the beginning of the flow:
<var name="searchCriteria" class="com.mycompany.myapp.hotels.search.SearchCriteria"/>
and then reference this variable in one of the flow's JSF view templates through EL:
<h:inputText id="searchString" value="#{searchCriteria.searchString}"/>
Note that you do not need to prefix the variable with its scope when referencing it from the template (though you can do so if you need to be more specific). As with standard JSF beans, all available scopes will be searched for a matching variable, so you could change the scope of the variable in your flow definition without having to modify the EL expressions that reference it.
You can also define view instance variables that are scoped to the current view and get cleaned up automatically upon transitioning to another view. This is quite useful with JSF as views are often constructed to handle multiple in-page events across many requests before transitioning to another view.
To define a view instance variable, you can use the
var
element inside a view-state
definition:
<view-state id="enterSearchCriteria"> <var name="searchCriteria" class="com.mycompany.myapp.hotels.search.SearchCriteria"/> </view-state>
Though defining autowired flow instance variables provides nice modularization and readability, occasions may arise where you want to utilize the other capabilities of the Spring container such as AOP. In these cases, you can define a bean in your Spring ApplicationContext and give it a specific web flow scope:
<bean id="searchCriteria" class="com.mycompany.myapp.hotels.search.SearchCriteria" scope="flow"/>
The major difference with this approach is that the bean will not be fully initialized until it is first accessed via an EL expression. This sort of lazy instantiation via EL is quite similar to how JSF managed beans are typically allocated.
The need to initialize the model before view rendering (such as by loading persistent entities from a database) is quite common, but JSF by itself does not provide any convenient hooks for such initialization. The flow definition language provides a natural facility for this through its Actions . Spring Web Flow provides some extra conveniences for converting the outcome of an action into a JSF-specific data structure. For example:
<on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findBookings(currentUser.name)" result="viewScope.bookings" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render>
This will take the result of the
bookingService.findBookings
method an wrap it in a custom
JSF DataModel so that the list can be used in a standard JSF DataTable
component:
<h:dataTable id="bookings" styleClass="summary" value="#{bookings}" var="booking" rendered="#{bookings.rowCount > 0}"> <h:column> <f:facet name="header">Name</f:facet> #{booking.hotel.name} </h:column> <h:column> <f:facet name="header">Confirmation number</f:facet> #{booking.id} </h:column> <h:column> <f:facet name="header">Action</f:facet> <h:commandLink id="cancel" value="Cancel" action="cancelBooking" /> </h:column> </h:dataTable>
In the example above result-type="dataModel" results in the
wrapping of List<Booking> with custom
DataModel
type. The custom
DataModel
provides extra conveniences such as
being serializable for storage beyond request scope as well as access to
the currently selected row in EL expressions. For example, on postback
from a view where the action event was fired by a component within a
DataTable, you can take action on the selected row's model
instance:
<transition on="cancelBooking"> <evaluate expression="bookingService.cancelBooking(bookings.selectedRow)" /> </transition>
Spring Web Flow provides two custom DataModel types:
OneSelectionTrackingListDataModel
and
ManySelectionTrackingListDataModel
. As the names
indicate they keep track of one or multiple selected rows. This is done
with the help of a
SelectionTrackingActionListener
listener, which
responds to JSF action events and invokes the appopriate methods on the
SelectinAware
data models to record the currently
clicked row.
To understand how this is configured, keep in mind the
FacesConversionService
registers a
DataModelConverter
against the alias "dataModel"
on startup. When result-type="dataModel" is used in a flow definition it
causes the DataModelConverter
to be used. The
converter then wraps the given List with an instance of
OneSelectionTrackingListDataModel
. To use the
ManySelectionTrackingListDataModel
you will need
to register your own custom converter.
Spring Web Flow allows you to handle JSF action events in a decoupled way, requiring no direct dependencies in your Java code on JSF API's. In fact, these events can often be handled completely in the flow definiton language without requiring any custom Java action code at all. This allows for a more agile development process since the artifacts being manipulated in wiring up events (JSF view templates and SWF flow definitions) are instantly refreshable without requiring a build and re-deploy of the whole application.
A simple but common case in JSF is the need to signal an event
that causes manipulation of the model in some way and then redisplays
the same view to reflect the changed state of the model. The flow
definition language has special support for this in the
transition
element.
A good example of this is a table of paged list results. Suppose
you want to be able to load and display only a portion of a large result
list, and allow the user to page through the results. The initial
view-state
definition to load and display the list would
be:
<view-state id="reviewHotels"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render> </view-state>
You construct a JSF DataTable that displays the current
hotels
list, and then place a "More Results" link below the
table:
<h:commandLink id="nextPageLink" value="More Results" action="next"/>
This commandLink signals a "next" event from its action attribute.
You can then handle the event by adding to the view-state
definition:
<view-state id="reviewHotels"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render> <transition on="next"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.nextPage()" /> </transition> </view-state>
Here you handle the "next" event by incrementing the page count on
the searchCriteria instance. The on-render
action is then
called again with the updated criteria, which causes the next page of
results to be loaded into the DataModel. The same view is re-rendered
since there was no to
attribute on the
transition
element, and the changes in the model are
reflected in the view.
The next logical level beyond in-page events are events that require navigation to another view, with some manipulation of the model along the way. Achieving this with pure JSF would require adding a navigation rule to faces-config.xml and likely some intermediary Java code in a JSF managed bean (both tasks requiring a re-deploy). With the flow defintion language, you can handle such a case concisely in one place in a quite similar way to how in-page events are handled.
Continuing on with our use case of manipulating a paged list of
results, suppose we want each row in the displayed DataTable to contain
a link to a detail page for that row instance. You can add a column to
the table containing the following commandLink
component:
<h:commandLink id="viewHotelLink" value="View Hotel" action="select"/>
This raises the "select" event which you can then handle by adding
another transition
element to the existing
view-state
:
<view-state id="reviewHotels"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render> <transition on="next"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.nextPage()" /> </transition> <transition on="select" to="reviewHotel"> <set name="flowScope.hotel" value="hotels.selectedRow" /> </transition> </view-state>
Here the "select" event is handled by pushing the currently
selected hotel instance from the DataTable into flow scope, so that it
may be referenced by the "reviewHotel" view-state
.
JSF provides useful facilities for validating input at field-level before changes are applied to the model, but when you need to then perform more complex validation at the model-level after the updates have been applied, you are generally left with having to add more custom code to your JSF action methods in the managed bean. Validation of this sort is something that is generally a responsibility of the domain model itself, but it is difficult to get any error messages propagated back to the view without introducing an undesirable dependency on the JSF API in your domain layer.
With Web Flow, you can utilize the generic and low-level
MessageContext
in your business code and any messages added
there will then be available to the FacesContext
at render
time.
For example, suppose you have a view where the user enters the
necessary details to complete a hotel booking, and you need to ensure
the Check In and Check Out dates adhere to a given set of business
rules. You can invoke such model-level validation from a
transition
element:
<view-state id="enterBookingDetails"> <transition on="proceed" to="reviewBooking"> <evaluate expression="booking.validateEnterBookingDetails(messageContext)" /> </transition> </view-state>
Here the "proceed" event is handled by invoking a model-level
validation method on the booking instance, passing the generic
MessageContext
instance so that messages may be recorded.
The messages can then be displayed along with any other JSF messages
with the h:messages
component,
JSF provides built-in support for sending Ajax requests and performing partial processing and rendering on the server-side. You can specify a list of id's for partial rendering through the <f:ajax> facelets tag.
In Spring Web Flow you also have the option to specify the ids to use for partial rendering on the server side with the render action:
<view-state id="reviewHotels"> <on-render> <evaluate expression="bookingService.findHotels(searchCriteria)" result="viewScope.hotels" result-type="dataModel" /> </on-render> <transition on="next"> <evaluate expression="searchCriteria.nextPage()" /> <render fragments="hotels:searchResultsFragment" /> </transition> </view-state>
By default when a flow enters a view state, it executes a client-side redirect before rendering the view. This approach is known as POST-REDIRECT-GET. It has the advantage of separating the form processing for one view from the rendering of the next view. As a result the browser Back and Refresh buttons work seamlessly without causing any browser warnings.
Normally the client-side redirect is transparent from a user's perspective. However, there are situations where POST-REDIRECT-GET may not bring the same benefits. For example sometimes it may be useful to embed a flow on a page and drive it via Ajax requests refreshing only the area of the page where the flow is rendered. Not only is it unnecessary to use client-side redirects in this case, it is also not the desired behavior with regards to keeping the surrounding content of the page intact.
To indicate a flow should execute in "page embedded" mode all you need to do is pass an extra flow input attribute called "mode" with a value of "embedded". Below is an example of a top-level container flow invoking a sub-flow in an embedded mode:
<subflow-state id="bookHotel" subflow="booking"> <input name="mode" value="'embedded'"/> </subflow-state>
When launched in "page embedded" mode the sub-flow will not issue flow execution redirects during Ajax requests.
If you'd like to see examples of an embedded flow please refer to the webflow-primefaces-showcase project. You can check out the source code locally, build it as you would a Maven project, and import it into Eclipse:
cd some-directory svn co https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-samples/webflow-primefaces-showcase cd webflow-primefaces-showcase mvn package # import into Eclipse
The specific example you need to look at is under the "Advanced Ajax" tab and is called "Top Flow with Embedded Sub-Flow".
By default Web Flow does a client-side redirect even it it remains in the same view state as long as the current request is not an Ajax request. This is quite useful after form validation failures for example. If the user hits Refresh or Back they won't see any browser warnings. They would if the Web Flow didn't do a redirect.
This can lead to a problem specific to JSF environments where a specific Sun Mojarra listener component caches the FacesContext assuming the same instance is available throughout the JSF lifecycle. In Web Flow however the render phase is temporarily put on hold and a client-side redirect executed.
The default behavior of Web Flow is desirable and it is unlikely JSF applications will experience the issue. This is because Ajax is often enabled the default in JSF component libraries and Web Flow does not redirect during Ajax requests. However if you experience this issue you can disable client-side redirects within the same view as follows:
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor"> <webflow:flow-execution-attributes> <webflow:redirect-in-same-state value="false"/> </webflow:flow-execution-attributes> </webflow:flow-executor>
Most JSF component providers include some form of 'file upload' component. Generally when working
with these components JSF must take complete control of parsing multi-part requests and Spring MVC's
MultipartResolver
cannot be used.
Spring Web Flow has been tested with file upload components from PrimeFaces and RichFaces. Check the documentation of your JSF component library for other providers to see how to configure file upload.
PrimeFaces provides a <p:fileUpload>
component for uploading files. In order
to use the component you need to configure the org.primefaces.webapp.filter.FileUploadFilter
servlet filter. The filter needs to be configured against Spring MVC's
DispatcherServlet
in your web.xml
:
<filter> <filter-name>PrimeFaces FileUpload Filter</filter-name> <filter-class>org.primefaces.webapp.filter.FileUploadFilter</filter-class> </filter> <filter-mapping> <filter-name>PrimeFaces FileUpload Filter</filter-name> <servlet-name>Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet</servlet-name> </filter-mapping>
For more details refer to the PrimeFaces documentation.
RichFaces provides a <rich:fileUpload>
component for uploading files. No
special configuration is required to use the component, however, you will need to perform
some additional steps in your fileUploadListener
.
Here is some typical XHTML markup. In this example the fileUploadBean
refers
to Spring singleton bean.
<rich:fileUpload id="upload" fileUploadListener="#{fileUploadBean.listener}" acceptedTypes="jpg, gif, png, bmp"> </rich:fileUpload>
Within your fileUploadBean
you need to tell Web Flow that the response has been
handled and that it should not attempt any redirects. The org.springframework.webflow.context.ExternalContext
interface provides a recordResponseComplete()
for just such purposes.
In addition, it is imperative that some partial response data is returned to the client. If your
<rich:fileUpload>
component does not specify a render
attribute you
may need to call processPartial(PhaseId.RENDER_RESPONSE)
on the JSF
PartialViewContext
.
public class FileUploadBean { public void listener(FileUploadEvent event) throws Exception{ FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getPartialViewContext().processPartial(PhaseId.RENDER_RESPONSE); ExternalContextHolder.getExternalContext().recordResponseComplete(); UploadedFile file = event.getUploadedFile(); // Do something with the file } }
For more details refer to the RichFaces documentation.
To use the library you'll need to create a .taglib.xml
file and register it in web.xml
.
Create the file
/WEB-INF/springsecurity.taglib.xml
with the following
content:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE facelet-taglib PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Facelet Taglib 1.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/facelet-taglib_1_0.dtd"> <facelet-taglib> <namespace>http://www.springframework.org/security/tags</namespace> <tag> <tag-name>authorize</tag-name> <handler-class>org.springframework.faces.security.FaceletsAuthorizeTagHandler</handler-class> </tag> <function> <function-name>areAllGranted</function-name> <function-class>org.springframework.faces.security.FaceletsAuthorizeTagUtils</function-class> <function-signature>boolean areAllGranted(java.lang.String)</function-signature> </function> <function> <function-name>areAnyGranted</function-name> <function-class>org.springframework.faces.security.FaceletsAuthorizeTagUtils</function-class> <function-signature>boolean areAnyGranted(java.lang.String)</function-signature> </function> <function> <function-name>areNotGranted</function-name> <function-class>org.springframework.faces.security.FaceletsAuthorizeTagUtils</function-class> <function-signature>boolean areNotGranted(java.lang.String)</function-signature> </function> <function> <function-name>isAllowed</function-name> <function-class>org.springframework.faces.security.FaceletsAuthorizeTagUtils</function-class> <function-signature>boolean isAllowed(java.lang.String, java.lang.String)</function-signature> </function> </facelet-taglib>
Next, register the above file taglib in web.xml:
<context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.FACELETS_LIBRARIES</param-name> <param-value>/WEB-INF/springsecurity.taglib.xml</param-value> </context-param>
Now you are ready to use the tag library in your views. You can use the authorize tag to include nested content conditionally:
<!DOCTYPE composition PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:sec="http://www.springframework.org/security/tags"> <sec:authorize ifAllGranted="ROLE_FOO, ROLE_BAR"> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet </sec:authorize> <sec:authorize ifNotGranted="ROLE_FOO, ROLE_BAR"> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet </sec:authorize> <sec:authorize ifAnyGranted="ROLE_FOO, ROLE_BAR"> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet </sec:authorize> </ui:composition>
You can also use one of several EL functions in the rendered or other attribute of any JSF component:
<!DOCTYPE composition PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:sec="http://www.springframework.org/security/tags"> <!-- Rendered only if user has all of the listed roles --> <h:outputText value="Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" rendered="#{sec:areAllGranted('ROLE_FOO, ROLE_BAR')}"/> <!-- Rendered only if user does not have any of the listed roles --> <h:outputText value="Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" rendered="#{sec:areNotGranted('ROLE_FOO, ROLE_BAR')}"/> <!-- Rendered only if user has any of the listed roles --> <h:outputText value="Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" rendered="#{sec:areAnyGranted('ROLE_FOO, ROLE_BAR')}"/> <!-- Rendered only if user has access to given HTTP method/URL as defined in Spring Security configuration --> <h:outputText value="Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" rendered="#{sec:isAllowed('/secured/foo', 'POST')}"/> </ui:composition>
The Spring Web Flow JSF integration strives to be compatible with any third-party JSF component library. By honoring all of the standard semantics of the JSF specification within the SWF-driven JSF lifecycle, third-party libraries in general should "just work". The main thing to remember is that configuration in web.xml will change slightly since Web Flow requests are not routed through the standard FacesServlet. Typically, anything that is traditionally mapped to the FacesServlet should be mapped to the Spring DispatcherServlet instead. (You can also map to both if for example you are migrating a legacy JSF application page-by-page.).
This chapter shows how to use Web Flow in a Portlet environment.
Spring Web Flow requires Portlet API 2.0 to run with.
The booking-portlet-mvc
sample application is a good reference for using Web Flow within a portlet.
This application is a simplified travel site that allows users to search for and book hotel rooms.
The configuration for a portlet depends on the portlet container used. The sample applications, included with Web Flow, are both configured to use Apache Pluto.
In general, the configuration requires adding a servlet mapping in the web.xml
file to dispatch request to the portlet container.
<servlet> <servlet-name>swf-booking-mvc</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.apache.pluto.core.PortletServlet</servlet-class> <init-param> <param-name>portlet-name</param-name> <param-value>swf-booking-mvc</param-value> </init-param> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>swf-booking-mvc</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/PlutoInvoker/swf-booking-mvc</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
The portlet.xml
configuration is a standard portlet configuration.
The portlet-class
needs to be set along with a pair of init-param
s.
Setting the expiration-cache
to 0
is recommended to force Web Flow to always render a fresh view.
<portlet> ... <portlet-class>org.springframework.web.portlet.DispatcherPortlet</portlet-class> <init-param> <name>contextConfigLocation</name> <value>/WEB-INF/web-application-config.xml</value> </init-param> <init-param> <name>viewRendererUrl</name> <value>/WEB-INF/servlet/view</value> </init-param> <expiration-cache>0</expiration-cache> ... </portlet>
The only supported mechanism for bridging a portlet request to Web Flow is a FlowHandler
.
The PortletFlowController
used in Web Flow 1.0 is no longer supported.
The flow handler, similar to the servlet flow handler, provides hooks that can:
select the flow to execute
pass input parameters to the flow on initialization
handle the flow execution outcome
handle exceptions
The AbstractFlowHandler
class is an implementation of FlowHandler
that provides default implementations for these hooks.
In a portlet environment the targeted flow id can not be inferred from the URL and must be defined explicitly in the handler.
public class ViewFlowHandler extends AbstractFlowHandler { public String getFlowId() { return "view"; } }
Spring Portlet MVC provides a rich set of methods to map portlet requests. Complete documentation is available in the Spring Reference Documentation.
The booking-portlet-mvc
sample application uses a PortletModeHandlerMapping
to map portlet requests.
The sample application only supports view
mode, but support for other portlet modes is available.
Other modes can be added and point to the same flow as view
mode, or any other flow.
<bean id="portletModeHandlerMapping" class="org.springframework.web.portlet.handler.PortletModeHandlerMapping"> <property name="portletModeMap"> <map> <entry key="view"> <bean class="org.springframework.webflow.samples.booking.ViewFlowHandler" /> </entry> </map> </property> </bean>
A FlowHandlerAdapter
converts the handler mappings to the flow handlers.
The flow executor is required as a constructor argument.
<bean id="flowHandlerAdapter" class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.portlet.FlowHandlerAdapter"> <property name="flowExecutor" ref="flowExecutor" /> </bean>
In order to facilitate view rendering, a ViewRendererServlet
must be added to the web.xml
file.
This servlet is not invoked directly, but it used by Web Flow to render views in a portlet environment.
<servlet> <servlet-name>ViewRendererServlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.ViewRendererServlet</servlet-class> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>ViewRendererServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/WEB-INF/servlet/view</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
The Portlet API defined three window states: normal, minimized and maximized.
The portlet implementation must decide what to render for each of these window states.
Web Flow exposes the string value of the window state under portletWindowState
via the request map on the external context.
requestContext.getExternalContext().getRequestMap().get("portletWindowState");
externalContext.requestMap.portletWindowState
The Portlet API defined three portlet modes: view, edit and help.
The portlet implementation must decide what to render for each of these modes.
Web Flow exposes the string value of the portlet mode under portletMode
via the request map on the external context.
requestContext.getExternalContext().getRequestMap().get("portletMode");
externalContext.requestMap.portletMode
Prior to version 2.1 of Spring Web Flow, support for JSF Portlets was considered experimental and relied on a Portlet Bridge for JSF implementation. Furthermore JSR-329 (the latest specification in this area), which targets Portlet API 2.0 and JSF 1.2 environments at the time of writing is not yet final causing portlet bridge implementations to also remain incomplete.
A closer comparison of Spring Web Flow and a Portlet Bridge for JSF shows the two have significant overlap. They both drive the JSF lifecycle and they both shield JSF from knowledge about Portlet action and render requests.
Considering all of the above, starting with version 2.2, Spring Web Flow provides support for JSF Portlets using its own internal Portlet integration rather than a Portlet Bridge for JSF. We believe this will provide value for Web Flow users by reducing the number of dependencies in what is already a fairly complex combination of technologies with specifications lagging behind.
What this practically means is the configuration required for JSF Portlets is very similar to what is alread documented in the rest of this chapter with the exception of Section 14.4, “Portlet Views”, which is not necessary with JSF.
Review the swf-booking-portlet-faces
sample in the Web Flow distribution
for a working JSF Portlets example with complete configuration details. The main
things to ensure are that the <faces:resources>
elements is
included as part of your Spring configuration and that your
faces-config.xml
configuration includes a PortletViewHandler
:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE faces-config PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JavaServer Faces Config 1.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd"> <faces-config> <application> <view-handler> org.springframework.faces.webflow.context.portlet.PortletViewHandler </view-handler> </application> </faces-config>
The JSF Portlet support provided with Spring Web Flow requires JSF v2.0 or above. If
you are upgrading from a previous release you should ensure that your faces-config.xml
references org.springframework.faces.webflow.context.portlet.PortletViewHandler
instead
of org.springframework.faces.webflow.application.portlet.PortletFaceletViewHandler
. You
should also ensure that you have added <faces:resources>
to you Spring configuration.
Although JSF v2.0 is a minimum requirement, this has been primarily driven to provide better support in a Servlet environment. Many of the more advanced JSF 2.0 features (for example 'Partial State Saving') are not supported by Spring Web Flow in a Portlet environment.
The Portlet API only allows redirects to be requested from an action request.
Because views are rendered on the render request, views and view-state
s cannot trigger a redirect.
The externalRedirect:
view prefix is a convenience for Servlet based flows.
An IllegalStateException
is thrown if a redirect is requested from a render request.
end-state
redirects can be achieved by implementing FlowHandler.handleExecutionOutcome
.
This callback provides the ActionResponse
object which supports redirects.
The portlet container passes the execution key from the previous flow when switching to a new mode.
Even if the mode is mapped to a different FlowHandler
the flow execution will resume the previous execution.
You may switch the mode programatically in your FlowHandler after ending a flow in an ActionRequest.
One way to start a new flow is to create a URL targeting the mode without the execution key.
To test the execution of a XML-based flow definition, extend AbstractXmlFlowExecutionTests
:
public class BookingFlowExecutionTests extends AbstractXmlFlowExecutionTests { }
At a minimum, you must override getResource(FlowDefinitionResourceFactory)
to return the path to the flow you wish to test:
@Override protected FlowDefinitionResource getResource(FlowDefinitionResourceFactory resourceFactory) { return resourceFactory.createFileResource("src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/hotels/booking/booking.xml"); }
If your flow has dependencies on externally managed services,
also override configureFlowBuilderContext(MockFlowBuilderContext)
to register stubs or mocks of those services:
@Override protected void configureFlowBuilderContext(MockFlowBuilderContext builderContext) { builderContext.registerBean("bookingService", new StubBookingService()); }
If your flow extends from another flow, or has states that extend other states,
also override getModelResources(FlowDefinitionResourceFactory)
to return the path to the parent flows.
@Override protected FlowDefinitionResource[] getModelResources(FlowDefinitionResourceFactory resourceFactory) { return new FlowDefinitionResource[] { resourceFactory.createFileResource("src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/common/common.xml") }; }
Have your first test exercise the startup of your flow:
public void testStartBookingFlow() { Booking booking = createTestBooking(); MutableAttributeMap input = new LocalAttributeMap(); input.put("hotelId", "1"); MockExternalContext context = new MockExternalContext(); context.setCurrentUser("keith"); startFlow(input, context); assertCurrentStateEquals("enterBookingDetails"); assertTrue(getRequiredFlowAttribute("booking") instanceof Booking); }
Assertions generally verify the flow is in the correct state you expect.
Define additional tests to exercise flow event handling behavior.
You goal should be to exercise all paths through the flow.
You can use the convenient setCurrentState(String)
method to jump to the flow state where you wish to begin your test.
public void testEnterBookingDetails_Proceed() { setCurrentState("enterBookingDetails"); getFlowScope().put("booking", createTestBooking()); MockExternalContext context = new MockExternalContext(); context.setEventId("proceed"); resumeFlow(context); assertCurrentStateEquals("reviewBooking"); }
To test calling a subflow, register a mock implementation of the subflow that asserts input was passed in correctly and returns the correct outcome for your test scenario.
public void testBookHotel() { setCurrentState("reviewHotel"); Hotel hotel = new Hotel(); hotel.setId(1L); hotel.setName("Jameson Inn"); getFlowScope().put("hotel", hotel); getFlowDefinitionRegistry().registerFlowDefinition(createMockBookingSubflow()); MockExternalContext context = new MockExternalContext(); context.setEventId("book"); resumeFlow(context); // verify flow ends on 'bookingConfirmed' assertFlowExecutionEnded(); assertFlowExecutionOutcomeEquals("finish"); } public Flow createMockBookingSubflow() { Flow mockBookingFlow = new Flow("booking"); mockBookingFlow.setInputMapper(new Mapper() { public MappingResults map(Object source, Object target) { // assert that 1L was passed in as input assertEquals(1L, ((AttributeMap) source).get("hotelId")); return null; } }); // immediately return the bookingConfirmed outcome so the caller can respond new EndState(mockBookingFlow, "bookingConfirmed"); return mockBookingFlow; }
This chapter shows you how to upgrade existing Web Flow 1 application to Web Flow 2.
The core concepts behind the flow definition language have not changed between Web Flow 1 and 2. However, some of the element and attribute names have changed. These changes allow for the language to be both more concise and expressive. A complete list of mapping changes is available as an appendix.
An automated tool is available to aid in the conversion of existing 1.x flows to the new 2.x style.
The tool will convert all the old tag names to their new equivalents, if needed.
While the tool will make a best effort attempt at conversion, there is not a one-to-one mapping for all version 1 concepts.
If the tool was unable to convert a portion of the flow, it will be marked with a WARNING
comment in the resulting flow.
The conversion tool requires spring-webflow.jar, spring-core.jar and an XSLT 1.0 engine. Saxon 6.5.5 is recommended.
The tool can be run from the command line with the following command. Required libraries must be available on the classpath. The source must be a single flow to convert. The resulting converted flow will be sent to standard output.
java org.springframework.webflow.upgrade.WebFlowUpgrader flow-to-upgrade.xml
Bean actions have been deprecated in favor of EL based evaluate expressions. The EL expression is able to accept method parameters directly, so there is no longer a need for the argument tag. A side effect of this change is that method arguments must be of the correct type before invoking the action.
Inline flows are no longer supported. The contents of the inline flow must be moved into a new top-level flow. The inline flow's content has been converted for your convenience.
Output mappings can no longer add an item to a collection. Only assignment is supported.
The var bean attribute is no longer needed. All spring beans can be resolved via EL.
EL expressions are used heavily throughout the flow definition language. Many of the attributes that appear to be plain text are actually interpreted as EL. The standard EL delimiters (either ${} or #{} in Web Flow 2.0 or just #{} in Web Flow 2.1) are not necessary and will often cause an exception if they are included.
EL delimiters should be removed where necessary by the updater tool.
In Web Flow 1 there were two options available for configuring Web Flow, one using standard spring bean XML and the other using the webflow-config-1.0
schema.
The schema configuration option simplifies the configuration process by keeping long internal class names hidden and enabling contextual auto-complete.
The schema configuration option is the only way to configure Web Flow 2.
The FactoryBean
bean XML configuration method used in Web Flow 1 is no longer supported.
The schema configuration method should be used instead.
In particular beans defining FlowExecutorFactoryBean
and XmlFlowRegistryFactoryBean
should be updated.
Continue reading Web Flow Schema Configuration for details.
The webflow-config
configuration schema has also changed slightly from version 1 to 2.
The simplest way to update your application is modify the version of the schema to 2.0 then fix any errors in a schema aware XML editor.
The most common change is add 'flow-' to the beginning of the elements defined by the schema.
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:webflow="http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config http://www.springframework.org/schema/webflow-config/spring-webflow-config-2.4.xsd">
The flow executor is the core Web Flow configuration element.
This element replaces previous FlowExecutorFactoryBean
bean definitions.
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor" />
Flow execution listeners are also defined in the flow executor. Listeners are defined using standard bean definitions and added by reference.
<webflow:flow-executor id="flowExecutor" flow-registry="flowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-execution-listeners> <webflow:listener ref="securityFlowExecutionListener"/> </webflow:flow-execution-listeners> </webflow:flow-executor> <bean id="securityFlowExecutionListener" class="org.springframework.webflow.security.SecurityFlowExecutionListener" />
The flow-registry
contains a set of flow-location
s.
Every flow definition used by Web Flow must be added to the registry.
This element replaces previous XmlFlowRegistryFactoryBean
bean definitions.
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry"> <webflow:flow-location path="/WEB-INF/hotels/booking/booking.xml" /> </webflow:flow-registry>
The package name for flow controllers has changed from org.springframework.webflow.executor.mvc.FlowController
and is now org.springframework.webflow.mvc.servlet.FlowController
for Servlet MVC requests.
The portlet flow controller org.springframework.webflow.executor.mvc.PortletFlowController
has been replaced by a flow handler adapter available at org.springframework.webflow.mvc.portlet.FlowHandlerAdapter
.
They will need to be updated in the bean definitions.
The default URL handler has changed in Web Flow 2.
The flow identifier is now derived from the URL rather then passed explicitly.
In order to maintain comparability with existing views and URL structures a WebFlow1FlowUrlHandler
is available.
<bean name="/pos.htm" class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.servlet.FlowController"> <property name="flowExecutor" ref="flowExecutor" /> <property name="flowUrlHandler"> <bean class="org.springframework.webflow.context.servlet.WebFlow1FlowUrlHandler" /> </property> </bean>
Web Flow 2 by default will both select and render views. View were previously selected by Web Flow 1 and then rendered by an external view resolver.
In order for version 1 flows to work in Web Flow 2 the default view resolver must be overridden.
A common use case is to use Apache Tiles for view resolution.
The following configuration will replace the default view resolver with a Tiles view resolver.
The tilesViewResolver
in this example can be replaced with any other view resolver.
<webflow:flow-registry id="flowRegistry" flow-builder-services="flowBuilderServices"> <web:flow-location path="..." /> ... </webflow:flow-registry> <webflow:flow-builder-services id="flowBuilderServices" view-factory-creator="viewFactoryCreator"/> <bean id="viewFactoryCreator" class="org.springframework.webflow.mvc.builder.MvcViewFactoryCreator"> <property name="viewResolvers" ref="tilesViewResolver" /> </bean> <bean id="tilesViewResolver" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.UrlBasedViewResolver"> <property name="viewClass" value="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.tiles.TilesJstlView" /> </bean> <bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.tiles.TilesConfigurer"> <property name="definitions" value="/WEB-INF/tiles-def.xml" /> </bean>
Web Flow 1 required Spring MVC based flows to manually call FormAction
methods, notably:
setupForm
, bindAndValidate
to process form views.
Web Flow 2 now provides automatic model setup and binding using the model
attribute for view-state
s.
Please see the Binding to a Model section for details.
Web Flow 1 used OGNL exclusively for expressions within the flow definitions. Web Flow 2 adds support for Unified EL. Web Flow 2.1 uses Spring EL by default. United EL and OGNL can still be plugged in. Please see Chapter 4, Expression Language (EL) for details.
Flash scope in Web Flow 1 lived across the current request and into the next request. This was conceptually similar to Web Flow 2's view scope concept, but the semantics were not as well defined. In Web Flow 2, flash scope is cleared after every view render. This makes flashScope semantics in Web Flow consistent with other web frameworks.
Web Flow 2 offers significantly improved integration with JSF. Please see Chapter 13, JSF Integration for details.
The flow definition language has changed since the 1.0 release. This is a listing of the language elements in the 1.0 release, and how they map to elements in the 2.0 release. While most of the changes are semantic, there are a few structural changes. Please see the upgrade guide for more details about changes between Web Flow 1.0 and 2.0.
Table A.1. Mappings
SWF 1.0 | SWF 2.0 | Comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
action | * | use <evaluate /> | ||
bean | * | |||
name | * | |||
method | * | |||
action-state | action-state | |||
id | id | |||
* | parent | |||
argument | * | use <evaluate expression="func(arg1, arg2, ...)"/> | ||
expression | ||||
parameter-type | ||||
attribute | attribute | |||
name | name | |||
type | type | |||
value | value | |||
attribute-mapper | * | input and output elements can be in flows or subflows directly | ||
bean | * | now subflow-attribute-mapper attribute on subflow-state | ||
bean-action | * | use <evaluate /> | ||
bean | * | |||
name | * | |||
method | * | |||
decision-state | decision-state | |||
id | id | |||
* | parent | |||
end-actions | on-end | |||
end-state | end-state | |||
id | id | |||
view | view | |||
* | parent | |||
* | commit | |||
entry-actions | on-entry | |||
evaluate-action | evaluate | |||
expression | expression | |||
name | * | use <evaluate ...> <attribute name=”name” value="..." /> </evaluate> | ||
* | result | |||
* | result-type | |||
evaluation-result | * | use <evaluate result="..." /> | ||
name | * | |||
scope | * | |||
exception-handler | exception-handler | |||
bean | bean | |||
exit-actions | on-exit | |||
flow | flow | |||
* | start-state | |||
* | parent | |||
* | abstract | |||
global-transitions | global-transitions | |||
if | if | |||
test | test | |||
then | then | |||
else | else | |||
import | bean-import | |||
resource | resource | |||
inline-flow | * | convert to new top-level flow | ||
id | * | |||
input-attribute | input | |||
name | name | |||
scope | * | prefix name with scope <input name="flowScope.foo" /> | ||
required | required | |||
* | type | |||
* | value | |||
input-mapper | * | inputs can be in flows and subflows directly | ||
mapping | input or output | |||
source | name or value | name when in flow element, value when in subflow-state element | ||
target | name or value | value when in flow element, name when in subflow-state element | ||
target-collection | * | no longer supported | ||
from | * | detected automatically | ||
to | type | |||
required | required | |||
method-argument | * | use <evaluate expression="func(arg1, arg2, ...)"/> | ||
method-result | * | use <evaluate result="..." /> | ||
name | * | |||
scope | * | |||
output-attribute | output | |||
name | name | |||
scope | * | prefix name with scope <output name="flowScope.foo" /> | ||
required | required | |||
* | type | |||
* | value | |||
output-mapper | * | output can be in flows and subflows directly | ||
render-actions | on-render | |||
set | set | |||
attribute | name | |||
scope | * | prefix name with scope <set name="flowScope.foo" /> | ||
value | value | |||
name | * | use <set ...> <attribute name=”name” value="..." /> </set> | ||
* | type | |||
start-actions | on-start | |||
start-state | * | now <flow start-state="...">, or defaults to the first state in the flow | ||
idref | * | |||
subflow-state | subflow-state | |||
id | id | |||
flow | subflow | |||
* | parent | |||
* | subflow-attribute-mapper | |||
transition | transition | |||
on | on | |||
on-exception | on-exception | |||
to | to | |||
* | bind | |||
* | validate | |||
* | history | |||
value | value | |||
var | var | |||
name | name | |||
class | class | |||
scope | * | always flow scope | ||
bean | * | all Spring beans can be resolved with EL | ||
view-state | view-state | |||
id | id | |||
view | view | |||
* | parent | |||
* | redirect | |||
* | popup | |||
* | model | |||
* | history | |||
* | persistence-context | |||
* | render | |||
* | fragments | |||
* | secured | |||
* | attributes | |||
* | match |