The Spring Framework provides abstractions for asynchronous execution and scheduling of
tasks with the TaskExecutor
and TaskScheduler
interfaces, respectively. Spring also
features implementations of those interfaces that support thread pools or delegation to
CommonJ within an application server environment. Ultimately the use of these
implementations behind the common interfaces abstracts away the differences between Java
SE 5, Java SE 6 and Java EE environments.
Spring also features integration classes for supporting scheduling with the Timer
,
part of the JDK since 1.3, and the Quartz Scheduler ( http://quartz-scheduler.org).
Both of those schedulers are set up using a FactoryBean
with optional references to
Timer
or Trigger
instances, respectively. Furthermore, a convenience class for both
the Quartz Scheduler and the Timer
is available that allows you to invoke a method of
an existing target object (analogous to the normal MethodInvokingFactoryBean
operation).
Spring 2.0 introduces a new abstraction for dealing with executors. Executors are the Java 5 name for the concept of thread pools. The "executor" naming is due to the fact that there is no guarantee that the underlying implementation is actually a pool; an executor may be single-threaded or even synchronous. Spring’s abstraction hides implementation details between Java SE 1.4, Java SE 5 and Java EE environments.
Spring’s TaskExecutor
interface is identical to the java.util.concurrent.Executor
interface. In fact, its primary reason for existence was to abstract away the need for
Java 5 when using thread pools. The interface has a single method execute(Runnable
task)
that accepts a task for execution based on the semantics and configuration of the
thread pool.
The TaskExecutor
was originally created to give other Spring components an abstraction
for thread pooling where needed. Components such as the ApplicationEventMulticaster
,
JMS’s AbstractMessageListenerContainer
, and Quartz integration all use the
TaskExecutor
abstraction to pool threads. However, if your beans need thread pooling
behavior, it is possible to use this abstraction for your own needs.
There are a number of pre-built implementations of TaskExecutor
included with the
Spring distribution. In all likelihood, you shouldn’t ever need to implement your own.
SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor
This implementation does not reuse any threads, rather it starts up a new thread
for each invocation. However, it does support a concurrency limit which will block
any invocations that are over the limit until a slot has been freed up. If you
re looking for true pooling, keep scrolling further down the page.
SyncTaskExecutor
This implementation doesn’t execute invocations asynchronously. Instead, each
invocation takes place in the calling thread. It is primarily used in situations
where multi-threading isn’t necessary such as simple test cases.
ConcurrentTaskExecutor
This implementation is an adapter for a java.util.concurrent.Executor
object.
There is an alternative, ThreadPoolTaskExecutor, that exposes the `Executor
configuration parameters as bean properties. It is rare to need to use the
ConcurrentTaskExecutor
but if the ThreadPoolTaskExecutor
isn’t flexible enough for your needs, the ConcurrentTaskExecutor
is an alternative.
SimpleThreadPoolTaskExecutor
This implementation is actually a subclass of Quartz’s SimpleThreadPool
which
listens to Spring’s lifecycle callbacks. This is typically used when you have a
thread pool that may need to be shared by both Quartz and non-Quartz components.
ThreadPoolTaskExecutor
This implementation is the most commonly used one. It exposes bean properties for
configuring a java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor` and wraps it in a TaskExecutor
.
If you need to adapt to a different kind of java.util.concurrent.Executor
, it is
recommended that you use a ConcurrentTaskExecutor
instead.
WorkManagerTaskExecutor
This implementation uses the CommonJ WorkManager as its backing implementation and is
the central convenience class for setting up a CommonJ WorkManager reference in a Spring
context. Similar to the SimpleThreadPoolTaskExecutor
,
this class implements the WorkManager interface and therefore can be used directly as a
WorkManager as well.
Spring’s TaskExecutor
implementations are used as simple JavaBeans. In the example
below, we define a bean that uses the ThreadPoolTaskExecutor
to asynchronously print
out a set of messages.
import org.springframework.core.task.TaskExecutor; public class TaskExecutorExample { private class MessagePrinterTask implements Runnable { private String message; public MessagePrinterTask(String message) { this.message = message; } public void run() { System.out.println(message); } } private TaskExecutor taskExecutor; public TaskExecutorExample(TaskExecutor taskExecutor) { this.taskExecutor = taskExecutor; } public void printMessages() { for(int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { taskExecutor.execute(new MessagePrinterTask("Message" + i)); } } }
As you can see, rather than retrieving a thread from the pool and executing yourself,
you add your Runnable
to the queue and the TaskExecutor
uses its internal rules to
decide when the task gets executed.
To configure the rules that the TaskExecutor
will use, simple bean properties have
been exposed.
<bean id="taskExecutor" class="org.springframework.scheduling.concurrent.ThreadPoolTaskExecutor"> <property name="corePoolSize" value="5" /> <property name="maxPoolSize" value="10" /> <property name="queueCapacity" value="25" /> </bean> <bean id="taskExecutorExample" class="TaskExecutorExample"> <constructor-arg ref="taskExecutor" /> </bean>
In addition to the TaskExecutor
abstraction, Spring 3.0 introduces a TaskScheduler
with a variety of methods for scheduling tasks to run at some point in the future.
public interface TaskScheduler { ScheduledFuture schedule(Runnable task, Trigger trigger); ScheduledFuture schedule(Runnable task, Date startTime); ScheduledFuture scheduleAtFixedRate(Runnable task, Date startTime, long period); ScheduledFuture scheduleAtFixedRate(Runnable task, long period); ScheduledFuture scheduleWithFixedDelay(Runnable task, Date startTime, long delay); ScheduledFuture scheduleWithFixedDelay(Runnable task, long delay); }
The simplest method is the one named schedule that takes a Runnable
and Date
only.
That will cause the task to run once after the specified time. All of the other methods
are capable of scheduling tasks to run repeatedly. The fixed-rate and fixed-delay
methods are for simple, periodic execution, but the method that accepts a Trigger is
much more flexible.
The Trigger
interface is essentially inspired by JSR-236, which, as of Spring 3.0, has
not yet been officially implemented. The basic idea of the Trigger
is that execution
times may be determined based on past execution outcomes or even arbitrary conditions.
If these determinations do take into account the outcome of the preceding execution,
that information is available within a TriggerContext
. The Trigger
interface itself
is quite simple:
public interface Trigger { Date nextExecutionTime(TriggerContext triggerContext); }
As you can see, the TriggerContext
is the most important part. It encapsulates all of
the relevant data, and is open for extension in the future if necessary. The
TriggerContext
is an interface (a SimpleTriggerContext
implementation is used by
default). Here you can see what methods are available for Trigger
implementations.
public interface TriggerContext { Date lastScheduledExecutionTime(); Date lastActualExecutionTime(); Date lastCompletionTime(); }
Spring provides two implementations of the Trigger
interface. The most interesting one
is the CronTrigger
. It enables the scheduling of tasks based on cron expressions. For
example, the following task is being scheduled to run 15 minutes past each hour but only
during the 9-to-5 "business hours" on weekdays.
scheduler.schedule(task, new CronTrigger("0 15 9-17 * * MON-FRI"));
The other out-of-the-box implementation is a PeriodicTrigger
that accepts a fixed
period, an optional initial delay value, and a boolean to indicate whether the period
should be interpreted as a fixed-rate or a fixed-delay. Since the TaskScheduler
interface already defines methods for scheduling tasks at a fixed-rate or with a
fixed-delay, those methods should be used directly whenever possible. The value of the
PeriodicTrigger
implementation is that it can be used within components that rely on
the Trigger
abstraction. For example, it may be convenient to allow periodic triggers,
cron-based triggers, and even custom trigger implementations to be used interchangeably.
Such a component could take advantage of dependency injection so that such Triggers
could be configured externally and therefore easily modified or extended.
As with Spring’s TaskExecutor
abstraction, the primary benefit of the TaskScheduler
is that code relying on scheduling behavior need not be coupled to a particular
scheduler implementation. The flexibility this provides is particularly relevant when
running within Application Server environments where threads should not be created
directly by the application itself. For such cases, Spring provides a
TimerManagerTaskScheduler
that delegates to a CommonJ TimerManager instance, typically
configured with a JNDI-lookup.
A simpler alternative, the ThreadPoolTaskScheduler
, can be used whenever external
thread management is not a requirement. Internally, it delegates to a
ScheduledExecutorService
instance. ThreadPoolTaskScheduler
actually implements
Spring’s TaskExecutor
interface as well, so that a single instance can be used for
asynchronous execution as soon as possible as well as scheduled, and potentially
recurring, executions.
Spring provides annotation support for both task scheduling and asynchronous method execution.
To enable support for @Scheduled
and @Async
annotations add @EnableScheduling
and
@EnableAsync
to one of your @Configuration
classes:
@Configuration @EnableAsync @EnableScheduling public class AppConfig { }
You are free to pick and choose the relevant annotations for your application. For
example, if you only need support for @Scheduled
, simply omit @EnableAsync
. For more
fine-grained control you can additionally implement the SchedulingConfigurer
and/or
AsyncConfigurer
interfaces. See the javadocs for full details.
If you prefer XML configuration use the <task:annotation-driven>
element.
<task:annotation-driven executor="myExecutor" scheduler="myScheduler"/> <task:executor id="myExecutor" pool-size="5"/> <task:scheduler id="myScheduler" pool-size="10"/>
Notice with the above XML that an executor reference is provided for handling those
tasks that correspond to methods with the @Async
annotation, and the scheduler
reference is provided for managing those methods annotated with @Scheduled
.
The @Scheduled annotation can be added to a method along with trigger metadata. For example, the following method would be invoked every 5 seconds with a fixed delay, meaning that the period will be measured from the completion time of each preceding invocation.
@Scheduled(fixedDelay=5000) public void doSomething() { // something that should execute periodically }
If a fixed rate execution is desired, simply change the property name specified within the annotation. The following would be executed every 5 seconds measured between the successive start times of each invocation.
@Scheduled(fixedRate=5000) public void doSomething() { // something that should execute periodically }
For fixed-delay and fixed-rate tasks, an initial delay may be specified indicating the number of milliseconds to wait before the first execution of the method.
@Scheduled(initialDelay=1000, fixedRate=5000) public void doSomething() { // something that should execute periodically }
If simple periodic scheduling is not expressive enough, then a cron expression may be provided. For example, the following will only execute on weekdays.
@Scheduled(cron="*/5 * * * * MON-FRI") public void doSomething() { // something that should execute on weekdays only }
Tip | |
---|---|
You can additionally use the |
Notice that the methods to be scheduled must have void returns and must not expect any arguments. If the method needs to interact with other objects from the Application Context, then those would typically have been provided through dependency injection.
Note | |
---|---|
Make sure that you are not initializing multiple instances of the same @Scheduled annotation class at runtime, unless you do want to schedule callbacks to each such instance. Related to this, make sure that you do not use @Configurable on bean classes which are annotated with @Scheduled and registered as regular Spring beans with the container: You would get double initialization otherwise, once through the container and once through the @Configurable aspect, with the consequence of each @Scheduled method being invoked twice. |
The @Async
annotation can be provided on a method so that invocation of that method
will occur asynchronously. In other words, the caller will return immediately upon
invocation and the actual execution of the method will occur in a task that has been
submitted to a Spring TaskExecutor
. In the simplest case, the annotation may be
applied to a void
-returning method.
@Async void doSomething() { // this will be executed asynchronously }
Unlike the methods annotated with the @Scheduled
annotation, these methods can expect
arguments, because they will be invoked in the "normal" way by callers at runtime rather
than from a scheduled task being managed by the container. For example, the following is
a legitimate application of the @Async
annotation.
@Async void doSomething(String s) { // this will be executed asynchronously }
Even methods that return a value can be invoked asynchronously. However, such methods
are required to have a Future
typed return value. This still provides the benefit of
asynchronous execution so that the caller can perform other tasks prior to calling
get()
on that Future.
@Async Future<String> returnSomething(int i) { // this will be executed asynchronously }
@Async
can not be used in conjunction with lifecycle callbacks such as
@PostConstruct
. To asynchronously initialize Spring beans you currently have to use a
separate initializing Spring bean that invokes the @Async
annotated method on the
target then.
public class SampleBeanImpl implements SampleBean { @Async void doSomething() { // ... } } public class SampleBeanInititalizer { private final SampleBean bean; public SampleBeanInitializer(SampleBean bean) { this.bean = bean; } @PostConstruct public void initialize() { bean.doSomething(); } }
By default when specifying @Async
on a method, the executor that will be used is the
one supplied to the annotation-driven element as described above. However, the value
attribute of the @Async
annotation can be used when needing to indicate that an
executor other than the default should be used when executing a given method.
@Async("otherExecutor") void doSomething(String s) { // this will be executed asynchronously by "otherExecutor" }
In this case, "otherExecutor" may be the name of any Executor
bean in the Spring
container, or may be the name of a qualifier associated with any Executor
, e.g. as
specified with the <qualifier>
element or Spring’s @Qualifier
annotation.
When an @Async
method has a Future
typed return value, it is easy to manage
an exception that was thrown during the method execution as this exception will
be thrown when calling get
on the Future
result. With a void return type
however, the exception is uncaught and cannot be transmitted. For those cases, an
AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler
can be provided to handle such exceptions.
public class MyAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler implements AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler { @Override public void handleUncaughtException(Throwable ex, Method method, Object... params) { // handle exception } }
By default, the exception is simply logged. A custom AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler
can
be defined via AsyncConfigurer
or the task:annotation-driven
XML element.
Beginning with Spring 3.0, there is an XML namespace for configuring TaskExecutor
and
TaskScheduler
instances. It also provides a convenient way to configure tasks to be
scheduled with a trigger.
The following element will create a ThreadPoolTaskScheduler
instance with the
specified thread pool size.
<task:scheduler id="scheduler" pool-size="10"/>
The value provided for the id attribute will be used as the prefix for thread names within the pool. The scheduler element is relatively straightforward. If you do not provide a pool-size attribute, the default thread pool will only have a single thread. There are no other configuration options for the scheduler.
The following will create a ThreadPoolTaskExecutor
instance:
<task:executor id="executor" pool-size="10"/>
As with the scheduler above, the value provided for the id attribute will be used as
the prefix for thread names within the pool. As far as the pool size is concerned, the
executor element supports more configuration options than the scheduler element. For
one thing, the thread pool for a ThreadPoolTaskExecutor
is itself more configurable.
Rather than just a single size, an executor’s thread pool may have different values for
the core and the max size. If a single value is provided then the executor will
have a fixed-size thread pool (the core and max sizes are the same). However, the
executor element’s pool-size attribute also accepts a range in the form of "min-max".
<task:executor id="executorWithPoolSizeRange" pool-size="5-25" queue-capacity="100"/>
As you can see from that configuration, a queue-capacity value has also been provided. The configuration of the thread pool should also be considered in light of the executor’s queue capacity. For the full description of the relationship between pool size and queue capacity, consult the documentation for ThreadPoolExecutor. The main idea is that when a task is submitted, the executor will first try to use a free thread if the number of active threads is currently less than the core size. If the core size has been reached, then the task will be added to the queue as long as its capacity has not yet been reached. Only then, if the queue’s capacity has been reached, will the executor create a new thread beyond the core size. If the max size has also been reached, then the executor will reject the task.
By default, the queue is unbounded, but this is rarely the desired configuration,
because it can lead to OutOfMemoryErrors
if enough tasks are added to that queue while
all pool threads are busy. Furthermore, if the queue is unbounded, then the max size has
no effect at all. Since the executor will always try the queue before creating a new
thread beyond the core size, a queue must have a finite capacity for the thread pool to
grow beyond the core size (this is why a fixed size pool is the only sensible case
when using an unbounded queue).
In a moment, we will review the effects of the keep-alive setting which adds yet another
factor to consider when providing a pool size configuration. First, let’s consider the
case, as mentioned above, when a task is rejected. By default, when a task is rejected,
a thread pool executor will throw a TaskRejectedException
. However, the rejection
policy is actually configurable. The exception is thrown when using the default
rejection policy which is the AbortPolicy
implementation. For applications where some
tasks can be skipped under heavy load, either the DiscardPolicy
or
DiscardOldestPolicy
may be configured instead. Another option that works well for
applications that need to throttle the submitted tasks under heavy load is the
CallerRunsPolicy
. Instead of throwing an exception or discarding tasks, that policy
will simply force the thread that is calling the submit method to run the task itself.
The idea is that such a caller will be busy while running that task and not able to
submit other tasks immediately. Therefore it provides a simple way to throttle the
incoming load while maintaining the limits of the thread pool and queue. Typically this
allows the executor to "catch up" on the tasks it is handling and thereby frees up some
capacity on the queue, in the pool, or both. Any of these options can be chosen from an
enumeration of values available for the rejection-policy attribute on the executor
element.
<task:executor id="executorWithCallerRunsPolicy" pool-size="5-25" queue-capacity="100" rejection-policy="CALLER_RUNS"/>
Finally, the keep-alive
setting determines the time limit (in seconds) for which threads
may remain idle before being terminated. If there are more than the core number of threads
currently in the pool, after waiting this amount of time without processing a task, excess
threads will get terminated. A time value of zero will cause excess threads to terminate
immediately after executing a task without remaining follow-up work in the task queue.
<task:executor id="executorWithKeepAlive" pool-size="5-25" keep-alive="120"/>
The most powerful feature of Spring’s task namespace is the support for configuring tasks to be scheduled within a Spring Application Context. This follows an approach similar to other "method-invokers" in Spring, such as that provided by the JMS namespace for configuring Message-driven POJOs. Basically a "ref" attribute can point to any Spring-managed object, and the "method" attribute provides the name of a method to be invoked on that object. Here is a simple example.
<task:scheduled-tasks scheduler="myScheduler"> <task:scheduled ref="beanA" method="methodA" fixed-delay="5000"/> </task:scheduled-tasks> <task:scheduler id="myScheduler" pool-size="10"/>
As you can see, the scheduler is referenced by the outer element, and each individual task includes the configuration of its trigger metadata. In the preceding example, that metadata defines a periodic trigger with a fixed delay indicating the number of milliseconds to wait after each task execution has completed. Another option is fixed-rate, indicating how often the method should be executed regardless of how long any previous execution takes. Additionally, for both fixed-delay and fixed-rate tasks an initial-delay parameter may be specified indicating the number of milliseconds to wait before the first execution of the method. For more control, a "cron" attribute may be provided instead. Here is an example demonstrating these other options.
<task:scheduled-tasks scheduler="myScheduler"> <task:scheduled ref="beanA" method="methodA" fixed-delay="5000" initial-delay="1000"/> <task:scheduled ref="beanB" method="methodB" fixed-rate="5000"/> <task:scheduled ref="beanC" method="methodC" cron="*/5 * * * * MON-FRI"/> </task:scheduled-tasks> <task:scheduler id="myScheduler" pool-size="10"/>
Quartz uses Trigger
, Job
and JobDetail
objects to realize scheduling of all kinds
of jobs. For the basic concepts behind Quartz, have a look at
http://quartz-scheduler.org. For convenience purposes, Spring offers a couple of
classes that simplify the usage of Quartz within Spring-based applications.
Quartz JobDetail
objects contain all information needed to run a job. Spring provides a
JobDetailFactoryBean
which provides bean-style properties for XML configuration purposes.
Let’s have a look at an example:
<bean name="exampleJob" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.JobDetailFactoryBean"> <property name="jobClass" value="example.ExampleJob"/> <property name="jobDataAsMap"> <map> <entry key="timeout" value="5"/> </map> </property> </bean>
The job detail configuration has all information it needs to run the job (ExampleJob
).
The timeout is specified in the job data map. The job data map is available through the
JobExecutionContext
(passed to you at execution time), but the JobDetail
also gets
its properties from the job data mapped to properties of the job instance. So in this
case, if the ExampleJob
contains a bean property named timeout
, the JobDetail
will have it applied automatically:
package example; public class ExampleJob extends QuartzJobBean { private int timeout; /** * Setter called after the ExampleJob is instantiated * with the value from the JobDetailFactoryBean (5) */ public void setTimeout(int timeout) { this.timeout = timeout; } protected void executeInternal(JobExecutionContext ctx) throws JobExecutionException { // do the actual work } }
All additional properties from the job data map are of course available to you as well.
Note | |
---|---|
Using the |
Often you just need to invoke a method on a specific object. Using the
MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean
you can do exactly this:
<bean id="jobDetail" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean"> <property name="targetObject" ref="exampleBusinessObject"/> <property name="targetMethod" value="doIt"/> </bean>
The above example will result in the doIt
method being called on the
exampleBusinessObject
method (see below):
public class ExampleBusinessObject { // properties and collaborators public void doIt() { // do the actual work } }
<bean id="exampleBusinessObject" class="examples.ExampleBusinessObject"/>
Using the MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean
, you don’t need to create one-line jobs
that just invoke a method, and you only need to create the actual business object and
wire up the detail object.
By default, Quartz Jobs are stateless, resulting in the possibility of jobs interfering
with each other. If you specify two triggers for the same JobDetail
, it might be
possible that before the first job has finished, the second one will start. If
JobDetail
classes implement the Stateful
interface, this won’t happen. The second
job will not start before the first one has finished. To make jobs resulting from the
MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean
non-concurrent, set the concurrent
flag to
false
.
<bean id="jobDetail" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean"> <property name="targetObject" ref="exampleBusinessObject"/> <property name="targetMethod" value="doIt"/> <property name="concurrent" value="false"/> </bean>
Note | |
---|---|
By default, jobs will run in a concurrent fashion. |
We’ve created job details and jobs. We’ve also reviewed the convenience bean that allows
you to invoke a method on a specific object. Of course, we still need to schedule the
jobs themselves. This is done using triggers and a SchedulerFactoryBean
. Several
triggers are available within Quartz and Spring offers two Quartz FactoryBean
implementations with convenient defaults: CronTriggerFactoryBean
and
SimpleTriggerFactoryBean
.
Triggers need to be scheduled. Spring offers a SchedulerFactoryBean
that exposes
triggers to be set as properties. SchedulerFactoryBean
schedules the actual jobs with
those triggers.
Find below a couple of examples:
<bean id="simpleTrigger" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SimpleTriggerFactoryBean"> <!-- see the example of method invoking job above --> <property name="jobDetail" ref="jobDetail"/> <!-- 10 seconds --> <property name="startDelay" value="10000"/> <!-- repeat every 50 seconds --> <property name="repeatInterval" value="50000"/> </bean> <bean id="cronTrigger" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.CronTriggerFactoryBean"> <property name="jobDetail" ref="exampleJob"/> <!-- run every morning at 6 AM --> <property name="cronExpression" value="0 0 6 * * ?"/> </bean>
Now we’ve set up two triggers, one running every 50 seconds with a starting delay of 10
seconds and one every morning at 6 AM. To finalize everything, we need to set up the
SchedulerFactoryBean
:
<bean class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SchedulerFactoryBean"> <property name="triggers"> <list> <ref bean="cronTrigger"/> <ref bean="simpleTrigger"/> </list> </property> </bean>
More properties are available for the SchedulerFactoryBean
for you to set, such as the
calendars used by the job details, properties to customize Quartz with, etc. Have a look
at the
SchedulerFactoryBean
javadocs for more information.