@Target(value=TYPE) @Retention(value=RUNTIME) @Documented @Import(value=TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.class) public @interface EnableTransactionManagement
<tx:*>
XML namespace. To be used on
@Configuration
classes to configure traditional, imperative transaction management or
reactive transaction management.
The following example demonstrates imperative transaction management
using a PlatformTransactionManager
. For reactive transaction management, configure a
ReactiveTransactionManager
instead.
@Configuration @EnableTransactionManagement public class AppConfig { @Bean public FooRepository fooRepository() { // configure and return a class having @Transactional methods return new JdbcFooRepository(dataSource()); } @Bean public DataSource dataSource() { // configure and return the necessary JDBC DataSource } @Bean public PlatformTransactionManager txManager() { return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource()); } }
For reference, the example above can be compared to the following Spring XML configuration:
<beans> <tx:annotation-driven/> <bean id="fooRepository" class="com.foo.JdbcFooRepository"> <constructor-arg ref="dataSource"/> </bean> <bean id="dataSource" class="com.vendor.VendorDataSource"/> <bean id="transactionManager" class="org.sfwk...DataSourceTransactionManager"> <constructor-arg ref="dataSource"/> </bean> </beans>In both of the scenarios above,
@EnableTransactionManagement
and <tx:annotation-driven/>
are responsible for registering the necessary Spring
components that power annotation-driven transaction management, such as the
TransactionInterceptor and the proxy- or AspectJ-based advice that weave the
interceptor into the call stack when JdbcFooRepository
's @Transactional
methods are invoked.
A minor difference between the two examples lies in the naming of the TransactionManager
bean: In the @Bean
case, the name is
"txManager" (per the name of the method); in the XML case, the name is
"transactionManager". The <tx:annotation-driven/>
is hard-wired to
look for a bean named "transactionManager" by default, however
@EnableTransactionManagement
is more flexible; it will fall back to a by-type
lookup for any TransactionManager
bean in the container. Thus the name
can be "txManager", "transactionManager", or "tm": it simply does not matter.
For those that wish to establish a more direct relationship between
@EnableTransactionManagement
and the exact transaction manager bean to be used,
the TransactionManagementConfigurer
callback interface may be implemented -
notice the implements
clause and the @Override
-annotated method below:
@Configuration @EnableTransactionManagement public class AppConfig implements TransactionManagementConfigurer { @Bean public FooRepository fooRepository() { // configure and return a class having @Transactional methods return new JdbcFooRepository(dataSource()); } @Bean public DataSource dataSource() { // configure and return the necessary JDBC DataSource } @Bean public PlatformTransactionManager txManager() { return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource()); } @Override public PlatformTransactionManager annotationDrivenTransactionManager() { return txManager(); } }
This approach may be desirable simply because it is more explicit, or it may be
necessary in order to distinguish between two TransactionManager
beans
present in the same container. As the name suggests, the
annotationDrivenTransactionManager()
will be the one used for processing
@Transactional
methods. See TransactionManagementConfigurer
Javadoc
for further details.
The mode()
attribute controls how advice is applied: If the mode is
AdviceMode.PROXY
(the default), then the other attributes control the behavior
of the proxying. Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through
the proxy only; local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way.
Note that if the mode() is set to AdviceMode.ASPECTJ
, then the
value of the proxyTargetClass()
attribute will be ignored. Note also that in
this case the spring-aspects
module JAR must be present on the classpath, with
compile-time weaving or load-time weaving applying the aspect to the affected classes.
There is no proxy involved in such a scenario; local calls will be intercepted as well.
TransactionManagementConfigurer
,
TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector
,
ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration
,
AspectJTransactionManagementConfiguration
Modifier and Type | Optional Element and Description |
---|---|
AdviceMode |
mode
Indicate how transactional advice should be applied.
|
int |
order
Indicate the ordering of the execution of the transaction advisor
when multiple advices are applied at a specific joinpoint.
|
boolean |
proxyTargetClass
Indicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created (
true ) as
opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies (false ). |
public abstract boolean proxyTargetClass
true
) as
opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies (false
). The default is
false
. Applicable only if mode()
is set to
AdviceMode.PROXY
.
Note that setting this attribute to true
will affect all
Spring-managed beans requiring proxying, not just those marked with
@Transactional
. For example, other beans marked with Spring's
@Async
annotation will be upgraded to subclass proxying at the same
time. This approach has no negative impact in practice unless one is explicitly
expecting one type of proxy vs another, e.g. in tests.
public abstract AdviceMode mode
The default is AdviceMode.PROXY
.
Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through the proxy
only. Local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way; an
Transactional
annotation on such a method within a local call will be
ignored since Spring's interceptor does not even kick in for such a runtime
scenario. For a more advanced mode of interception, consider switching this to
AdviceMode.ASPECTJ
.
public abstract int order
The default is Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE
.