This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Security 6.3.4! |
Authorize HttpServletRequest with FilterSecurityInterceptor
FilterSecurityInterceptor is in the process of being replaced by AuthorizationFilter .
Consider using that instead.
|
This section builds on Servlet Architecture and Implementation by digging deeper into how authorization works within Servlet based applications.
The FilterSecurityInterceptor
provides authorization for HttpServletRequest
s.
It is inserted into the FilterChainProxy as one of the Security Filters.
-
First, the
FilterSecurityInterceptor
obtains an Authentication from the SecurityContextHolder. -
Second,
FilterSecurityInterceptor
creates aFilterInvocation
from theHttpServletRequest
,HttpServletResponse
, andFilterChain
that are passed into theFilterSecurityInterceptor
. -
Next, it passes the
FilterInvocation
toSecurityMetadataSource
to get theConfigAttribute
s. -
Finally, it passes the
Authentication
,FilterInvocation
, andConfigAttribute
s to the xref:servlet/authorization.adoc#authz-access-decision-manager`AccessDecisionManager`.-
If authorization is denied, an
AccessDeniedException
is thrown. In this case theExceptionTranslationFilter
handles theAccessDeniedException
. -
If access is granted,
FilterSecurityInterceptor
continues with the FilterChain which allows the application to process normally.
-
By default, Spring Security’s authorization will require all requests to be authenticated. The explicit configuration looks like:
We can configure Spring Security to have different rules by adding more rules in order of precedence.
-
Java
-
XML
-
Kotlin
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
// ...
.authorizeRequests(authorize -> authorize (1)
.mvcMatchers("/resources/**", "/signup", "/about").permitAll() (2)
.mvcMatchers("/admin/**").hasRole("ADMIN") (3)
.mvcMatchers("/db/**").access("hasRole('ADMIN') and hasRole('DBA')") (4)
.anyRequest().denyAll() (5)
);
}
<http> (1)
<!-- ... -->
(2)
<intercept-url pattern="/resources/**" access="permitAll"/>
<intercept-url pattern="/signup" access="permitAll"/>
<intercept-url pattern="/about" access="permitAll"/>
<intercept-url pattern="/admin/**" access="hasRole('ADMIN')"/> (3)
<intercept-url pattern="/db/**" access="hasRole('ADMIN') and hasRole('DBA')"/> (4)
<intercept-url pattern="/**" access="denyAll"/> (5)
</http>
fun configure(http: HttpSecurity) {
http {
authorizeRequests { (1)
authorize("/resources/**", permitAll) (2)
authorize("/signup", permitAll)
authorize("/about", permitAll)
authorize("/admin/**", hasRole("ADMIN")) (3)
authorize("/db/**", "hasRole('ADMIN') and hasRole('DBA')") (4)
authorize(anyRequest, denyAll) (5)
}
}
}
1 | There are multiple authorization rules specified. Each rule is considered in the order they were declared. |
2 | We specified multiple URL patterns that any user can access. Specifically, any user can access a request if the URL starts with "/resources/", equals "/signup", or equals "/about". |
3 | Any URL that starts with "/admin/" will be restricted to users who have the role "ROLE_ADMIN".
You will notice that since we are invoking the hasRole method we do not need to specify the "ROLE_" prefix. |
4 | Any URL that starts with "/db/" requires the user to have both "ROLE_ADMIN" and "ROLE_DBA".
You will notice that since we are using the hasRole expression we do not need to specify the "ROLE_" prefix. |
5 | Any URL that has not already been matched on is denied access. This is a good strategy if you do not want to accidentally forget to update your authorization rules. |