|
This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Data Commons 3.3.5! |
Custom Repository Implementations
Spring Data provides various options to create query methods with little coding. But when those options don’t fit your needs you can also provide your own custom implementation for repository methods. This section describes how to do that.
Customizing Individual Repositories
To enrich a repository with custom functionality, you must first define a fragment interface and an implementation for the custom functionality, as follows:
interface CustomizedUserRepository {
void someCustomMethod(User user);
}class CustomizedUserRepositoryImpl implements CustomizedUserRepository {
public void someCustomMethod(User user) {
// Your custom implementation
}
}
The most important part of the class name that corresponds to the fragment interface is the Impl postfix.
|
The implementation itself does not depend on Spring Data and can be a regular Spring bean.
Consequently, you can use standard dependency injection behavior to inject references to other beans (such as a JdbcTemplate), take part in aspects, and so on.
Then you can let your repository interface extend the fragment interface, as follows:
interface UserRepository extends CrudRepository<User, Long>, CustomizedUserRepository {
// Declare query methods here
}Extending the fragment interface with your repository interface combines the CRUD and custom functionality and makes it available to clients.
Spring Data repositories are implemented by using fragments that form a repository composition. Fragments are the base repository, functional aspects (such as QueryDsl), and custom interfaces along with their implementations. Each time you add an interface to your repository interface, you enhance the composition by adding a fragment. The base repository and repository aspect implementations are provided by each Spring Data module.
The following example shows custom interfaces and their implementations:
interface HumanRepository {
void someHumanMethod(User user);
}
class HumanRepositoryImpl implements HumanRepository {
public void someHumanMethod(User user) {
// Your custom implementation
}
}
interface ContactRepository {
void someContactMethod(User user);
User anotherContactMethod(User user);
}
class ContactRepositoryImpl implements ContactRepository {
public void someContactMethod(User user) {
// Your custom implementation
}
public User anotherContactMethod(User user) {
// Your custom implementation
}
}The following example shows the interface for a custom repository that extends CrudRepository:
interface UserRepository extends CrudRepository<User, Long>, HumanRepository, ContactRepository {
// Declare query methods here
}Repositories may be composed of multiple custom implementations that are imported in the order of their declaration. Custom implementations have a higher priority than the base implementation and repository aspects. This ordering lets you override base repository and aspect methods and resolves ambiguity if two fragments contribute the same method signature. Repository fragments are not limited to use in a single repository interface. Multiple repositories may use a fragment interface, letting you reuse customizations across different repositories.
The following example shows a repository fragment and its implementation:
save(…)interface CustomizedSave<T> {
<S extends T> S save(S entity);
}
class CustomizedSaveImpl<T> implements CustomizedSave<T> {
public <S extends T> S save(S entity) {
// Your custom implementation
}
}The following example shows a repository that uses the preceding repository fragment:
interface UserRepository extends CrudRepository<User, Long>, CustomizedSave<User> {
}
interface PersonRepository extends CrudRepository<Person, Long>, CustomizedSave<Person> {
}Configuration
The repository infrastructure tries to autodetect custom implementation fragments by scanning for classes below the package in which it found a repository.
These classes need to follow the naming convention of appending a postfix defaulting to Impl.
The following example shows a repository that uses the default postfix and a repository that sets a custom value for the postfix:
-
Java
-
XML
@EnableJpaRepositories(repositoryImplementationPostfix = "MyPostfix")
class Configuration { … }<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" />
<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" repository-impl-postfix="MyPostfix" />The first configuration in the preceding example tries to look up a class called com.acme.repository.CustomizedUserRepositoryImpl to act as a custom repository implementation.
The second example tries to look up com.acme.repository.CustomizedUserRepositoryMyPostfix.
Resolution of Ambiguity
If multiple implementations with matching class names are found in different packages, Spring Data uses the bean names to identify which one to use.
Given the following two custom implementations for the CustomizedUserRepository shown earlier, the first implementation is used.
Its bean name is customizedUserRepositoryImpl, which matches that of the fragment interface (CustomizedUserRepository) plus the postfix Impl.
class CustomizedUserRepositoryImpl implements CustomizedUserRepository {
// Your custom implementation
}@Component("specialCustomImpl")
class CustomizedUserRepositoryImpl implements CustomizedUserRepository {
// Your custom implementation
}If you annotate the UserRepository interface with @Component("specialCustom"), the bean name plus Impl then matches the one defined for the repository implementation in com.acme.impl.two, and it is used instead of the first one.
Manual Wiring
If your custom implementation uses annotation-based configuration and autowiring only, the preceding approach shown works well, because it is treated as any other Spring bean. If your implementation fragment bean needs special wiring, you can declare the bean and name it according to the conventions described in the preceding section. The infrastructure then refers to the manually defined bean definition by name instead of creating one itself. The following example shows how to manually wire a custom implementation:
-
Java
-
XML
class MyClass {
MyClass(@Qualifier("userRepositoryImpl") UserRepository userRepository) {
…
}
}<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository" />
<beans:bean id="userRepositoryImpl" class="…">
<!-- further configuration -->
</beans:bean>Customize the Base Repository
The approach described in the preceding section requires customization of each repository interfaces when you want to customize the base repository behavior so that all repositories are affected. To instead change behavior for all repositories, you can create an implementation that extends the persistence technology-specific repository base class. This class then acts as a custom base class for the repository proxies, as shown in the following example:
class MyRepositoryImpl<T, ID>
extends SimpleJpaRepository<T, ID> {
private final EntityManager entityManager;
MyRepositoryImpl(JpaEntityInformation entityInformation,
EntityManager entityManager) {
super(entityInformation, entityManager);
// Keep the EntityManager around to used from the newly introduced methods.
this.entityManager = entityManager;
}
@Transactional
public <S extends T> S save(S entity) {
// implementation goes here
}
}
The class needs to have a constructor of the super class which the store-specific repository factory implementation uses.
If the repository base class has multiple constructors, override the one taking an EntityInformation plus a store specific infrastructure object (such as an EntityManager or a template class).
|
The final step is to make the Spring Data infrastructure aware of the customized repository base class.
In configuration, you can do so by using the repositoryBaseClass, as shown in the following example:
-
Java
-
XML
@Configuration
@EnableJpaRepositories(repositoryBaseClass = MyRepositoryImpl.class)
class ApplicationConfiguration { … }<repositories base-package="com.acme.repository"
base-class="….MyRepositoryImpl" />
