This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Integration 6.4.0! |
Security in Spring Integration
Security is one of the important functions in any modern enterprise (or cloud) application.
Moreover, it is critical for distributed systems, such as those built on Enterprise Integration Patterns.
Messaging independence and loose coupling let target systems communicate with each other with any type of data in the message’s payload
.
We can either trust all those messages or secure our service against “infecting” messages.
Spring Integration, together with Spring Security, provides a simple and comprehensive way to secure message channels, as well as other part of the integration solution.
Starting with version 6.0, the ChannelSecurityInterceptor
as well as its configuration via @SecuredChannel
annotation and XML <secured-channels>
have been deprecation in favor of using AuthorizationChannelInterceptor
from the spring-security-messaging
module.
The respective AuthorizationManager
infrastructure fully covers the previously supported role-based authentication, plus it allows the configuration of any other possible authorization strategies.
The only remaining Spring Integration SecurityContextPropagationChannelInterceptor
class has been deprecated and promoted to the mentioned spring-security-messaging
module as an org.springframework.security.messaging.context.SecurityContextPropagationChannelInterceptor
class.
Therefore, starting with version 6.2
the whole spring-integration-security
module is considered as deprecated in favor of an API proposed by the more common spring-security-messaging
library.
This module is scheduled for removal in the next 6.3
version.
Securing channels
To secure message channels in the integration flow, an AuthorizationChannelInterceptor
has to be added to those channels, or it can be configured as a global channel interceptor with respective pattern:
-
Java
-
XML
@Bean
@GlobalChannelInterceptor(patterns = "secured*")
AuthorizationChannelInterceptor authorizationChannelInterceptor() {
return new AuthorizationChannelInterceptor(AuthorityAuthorizationManager.hasAnyRole("ADMIN", "PRESIDENT"));
}
<channel-interceptor pattern="securedChannel*">
<beans:bean class="org.springframework.security.messaging.access.intercept.AuthorizationChannelInterceptor">
<beans:constructor-arg>
<beans:bean class="org.springframework.security.authorization.AuthorityAuthorizationManager"
factory-method="hasAnyRole">
<beans:constructor-arg>
<beans:array>
<beans:value>ADMIN</beans:value>
<beans:value>PRESIDENT</beans:value>
</beans:array>
</beans:constructor-arg>
</beans:bean>
</beans:constructor-arg>
</beans:bean>
</channel-interceptor>
See Global Channel Interceptor Configuration for more information.
Security Context Propagation
To be sure that our interaction with the application is secure, according to its security system rules, we should supply some security context with an authentication (principal) object.
The Spring Security project provides a flexible, canonical mechanism to authenticate our application clients over HTTP, WebSocket, or SOAP protocols (as can be done for any other integration protocol with a simple Spring Security extension).
It also provides a SecurityContext
for further authorization checks on the application objects, such as message channels.
By default, the SecurityContext
is tied to the execution state of the current Thread
by using the (ThreadLocalSecurityContextHolderStrategy
).
It is accessed by an AOP (Aspect-oriented Programming) interceptor on secured methods to check (for example) whether that principal
of the invocation has sufficient permissions to call that method.
This works well with the current thread.
Often, though, processing logic can be performed on another thread, on several threads, or even on external systems.
Standard thread-bound behavior is easy to configure if our application is built on the Spring Integration components and its message channels.
In this case, the secured objects can be any service activator or transformer, secured with a
MethodSecurityInterceptor
in their <request-handler-advice-chain>
(see Adding Behavior to Endpoints) or even MessageChannel
(see Securing channels, earlier).
When using DirectChannel
communication, the SecurityContext
is automatically available, because the downstream flow runs on the current thread.
However, in the cases of the QueueChannel
, ExecutorChannel
, and PublishSubscribeChannel
with an Executor
, messages are transferred from one thread to another (or several) by the nature of those channels.
In order to support such scenarios, we have two choices:
-
Transfer an
Authentication
object within the message headers and extract and authenticate it on the other side before secured object access. -
Propagate the
SecurityContext
to the thread that receives the transferred message.
This is implemented as a org.springframework.security.messaging.context.SecurityContextPropagationChannelInterceptor
in the spring-security-messaging
module, which can be added to any MessageChannel
or configured as a @GlobalChannelInterceptor
.
The logic of this interceptor is based on the SecurityContext
extraction from the current thread (from the preSend()
method) and its populating to another thread from the postReceive()
(beforeHandle()
) method.
See the SecurityContextPropagationChannelInterceptor
Javadocs for more information.
Propagation and population of SecurityContext
is just one half of the work.
Since the message is not an owner of the threads in the message flow, and the system should be sure that it is secured against any incoming messages, the SecurityContext
has to be cleaned up from ThreadLocal
.
The SecurityContextPropagationChannelInterceptor
provides the afterMessageHandled()
interceptor method implementation.
It cleans up operation by freeing the thread at the end of invocation from that propagated principal.
This means that, when the thread that processes the handed-off message finishes processing the message (successful or otherwise), the context is cleared so that it cannot inadvertently be used when processing another message.
When working with an asynchronous gateway, you should use an appropriate
|