This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Framework 6.2.0! |
Asynchronous Requests
Spring MVC has an extensive integration with Servlet asynchronous request processing:
-
DeferredResult
andCallable
return values in controller methods provide basic support for a single asynchronous return value. -
Controllers can stream multiple values, including SSE and raw data.
-
Controllers can use reactive clients and return reactive types for response handling.
For an overview of how this differs from Spring WebFlux, see the Async Spring MVC compared to WebFlux section below.
DeferredResult
Once the asynchronous request processing feature is enabled
in the Servlet container, controller methods can wrap any supported controller method
return value with DeferredResult
, as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@GetMapping("/quotes")
@ResponseBody
public DeferredResult<String> quotes() {
DeferredResult<String> deferredResult = new DeferredResult<>();
// Save the deferredResult somewhere..
return deferredResult;
}
// From some other thread...
deferredResult.setResult(result);
@GetMapping("/quotes")
@ResponseBody
fun quotes(): DeferredResult<String> {
val deferredResult = DeferredResult<String>()
// Save the deferredResult somewhere..
return deferredResult
}
// From some other thread...
deferredResult.setResult(result)
The controller can produce the return value asynchronously, from a different thread — for example, in response to an external event (JMS message), a scheduled task, or other event.
Callable
A controller can wrap any supported return value with java.util.concurrent.Callable
,
as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@PostMapping
public Callable<String> processUpload(final MultipartFile file) {
return () -> "someView";
}
@PostMapping
fun processUpload(file: MultipartFile) = Callable<String> {
// ...
"someView"
}
The return value can then be obtained by running the given task through the
configured AsyncTaskExecutor
.
Processing
Here is a very concise overview of Servlet asynchronous request processing:
-
A
ServletRequest
can be put in asynchronous mode by callingrequest.startAsync()
. The main effect of doing so is that the Servlet (as well as any filters) can exit, but the response remains open to let processing complete later. -
The call to
request.startAsync()
returnsAsyncContext
, which you can use for further control over asynchronous processing. For example, it provides thedispatch
method, which is similar to a forward from the Servlet API, except that it lets an application resume request processing on a Servlet container thread. -
The
ServletRequest
provides access to the currentDispatcherType
, which you can use to distinguish between processing the initial request, an asynchronous dispatch, a forward, and other dispatcher types.
DeferredResult
processing works as follows:
-
The controller returns a
DeferredResult
and saves it in some in-memory queue or list where it can be accessed. -
Spring MVC calls
request.startAsync()
. -
Meanwhile, the
DispatcherServlet
and all configured filters exit the request processing thread, but the response remains open. -
The application sets the
DeferredResult
from some thread, and Spring MVC dispatches the request back to the Servlet container. -
The
DispatcherServlet
is invoked again, and processing resumes with the asynchronously produced return value.
Callable
processing works as follows:
-
The controller returns a
Callable
. -
Spring MVC calls
request.startAsync()
and submits theCallable
to anAsyncTaskExecutor
for processing in a separate thread. -
Meanwhile, the
DispatcherServlet
and all filters exit the Servlet container thread, but the response remains open. -
Eventually the
Callable
produces a result, and Spring MVC dispatches the request back to the Servlet container to complete processing. -
The
DispatcherServlet
is invoked again, and processing resumes with the asynchronously produced return value from theCallable
.
For further background and context, you can also read the blog posts that introduced asynchronous request processing support in Spring MVC 3.2.
Exception Handling
When you use a DeferredResult
, you can choose whether to call setResult
or
setErrorResult
with an exception. In both cases, Spring MVC dispatches the request back
to the Servlet container to complete processing. It is then treated either as if the
controller method returned the given value or as if it produced the given exception.
The exception then goes through the regular exception handling mechanism (for example, invoking
@ExceptionHandler
methods).
When you use Callable
, similar processing logic occurs, the main difference being that
the result is returned from the Callable
or an exception is raised by it.
Interception
HandlerInterceptor
instances can be of type AsyncHandlerInterceptor
, to receive the
afterConcurrentHandlingStarted
callback on the initial request that starts asynchronous
processing (instead of postHandle
and afterCompletion
).
HandlerInterceptor
implementations can also register a CallableProcessingInterceptor
or a DeferredResultProcessingInterceptor
, to integrate more deeply with the
lifecycle of an asynchronous request (for example, to handle a timeout event). See
AsyncHandlerInterceptor
for more details.
DeferredResult
provides onTimeout(Runnable)
and onCompletion(Runnable)
callbacks.
See the javadoc of DeferredResult
for more details. Callable
can be substituted for WebAsyncTask
that exposes additional
methods for timeout and completion callbacks.
Async Spring MVC compared to WebFlux
The Servlet API was originally built for making a single pass through the Filter-Servlet
chain. Asynchronous request processing lets applications exit the Filter-Servlet chain
but leave the response open for further processing. The Spring MVC asynchronous support
is built around that mechanism. When a controller returns a DeferredResult
, the
Filter-Servlet chain is exited, and the Servlet container thread is released. Later, when
the DeferredResult
is set, an ASYNC
dispatch (to the same URL) is made, during which the
controller is mapped again but, rather than invoking it, the DeferredResult
value is used
(as if the controller returned it) to resume processing.
By contrast, Spring WebFlux is neither built on the Servlet API, nor does it need such an asynchronous request processing feature, because it is asynchronous by design. Asynchronous handling is built into all framework contracts and is intrinsically supported through all stages of request processing.
From a programming model perspective, both Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux support asynchronous and Reactive Types as return values in controller methods. Spring MVC even supports streaming, including reactive back pressure. However, individual writes to the response remain blocking (and are performed on a separate thread), unlike WebFlux, which relies on non-blocking I/O and does not need an extra thread for each write.
Another fundamental difference is that Spring MVC does not support asynchronous or reactive
types in controller method arguments (for example, @RequestBody
, @RequestPart
, and others),
nor does it have any explicit support for asynchronous and reactive types as model attributes.
Spring WebFlux does support all that.
Finally, from a configuration perspective the asynchronous request processing feature must be enabled at the Servlet container level.
HTTP Streaming
You can use DeferredResult
and Callable
for a single asynchronous return value.
What if you want to produce multiple asynchronous values and have those written to the
response? This section describes how to do so.
Objects
You can use the ResponseBodyEmitter
return value to produce a stream of objects, where
each object is serialized with an
HttpMessageConverter
and written to the
response, as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@GetMapping("/events")
public ResponseBodyEmitter handle() {
ResponseBodyEmitter emitter = new ResponseBodyEmitter();
// Save the emitter somewhere..
return emitter;
}
// In some other thread
emitter.send("Hello once");
// and again later on
emitter.send("Hello again");
// and done at some point
emitter.complete();
@GetMapping("/events")
fun handle() = ResponseBodyEmitter().apply {
// Save the emitter somewhere..
}
// In some other thread
emitter.send("Hello once")
// and again later on
emitter.send("Hello again")
// and done at some point
emitter.complete()
You can also use ResponseBodyEmitter
as the body in a ResponseEntity
, letting you
customize the status and headers of the response.
When an emitter
throws an IOException
(for example, if the remote client went away), applications
are not responsible for cleaning up the connection and should not invoke emitter.complete
or emitter.completeWithError
. Instead, the servlet container automatically initiates an
AsyncListener
error notification, in which Spring MVC makes a completeWithError
call.
This call, in turn, performs one final ASYNC
dispatch to the application, during which Spring MVC
invokes the configured exception resolvers and completes the request.
SSE
SseEmitter
(a subclass of ResponseBodyEmitter
) provides support for
Server-Sent Events, where events sent from the server
are formatted according to the W3C SSE specification. To produce an SSE
stream from a controller, return SseEmitter
, as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@GetMapping(path="/events", produces=MediaType.TEXT_EVENT_STREAM_VALUE)
public SseEmitter handle() {
SseEmitter emitter = new SseEmitter();
// Save the emitter somewhere..
return emitter;
}
// In some other thread
emitter.send("Hello once");
// and again later on
emitter.send("Hello again");
// and done at some point
emitter.complete();
@GetMapping("/events", produces = [MediaType.TEXT_EVENT_STREAM_VALUE])
fun handle() = SseEmitter().apply {
// Save the emitter somewhere..
}
// In some other thread
emitter.send("Hello once")
// and again later on
emitter.send("Hello again")
// and done at some point
emitter.complete()
While SSE is the main option for streaming into browsers, note that Internet Explorer does not support Server-Sent Events. Consider using Spring’s WebSocket messaging with SockJS fallback transports (including SSE) that target a wide range of browsers.
See also previous section for notes on exception handling.
Raw Data
Sometimes, it is useful to bypass message conversion and stream directly to the response
OutputStream
(for example, for a file download). You can use the StreamingResponseBody
return value type to do so, as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@GetMapping("/download")
public StreamingResponseBody handle() {
return new StreamingResponseBody() {
@Override
public void writeTo(OutputStream outputStream) throws IOException {
// write...
}
};
}
@GetMapping("/download")
fun handle() = StreamingResponseBody {
// write...
}
You can use StreamingResponseBody
as the body in a ResponseEntity
to
customize the status and headers of the response.
Reactive Types
Spring MVC supports use of reactive client libraries in a controller (also read
Reactive Libraries in the WebFlux section).
This includes the WebClient
from spring-webflux
and others, such as Spring Data
reactive data repositories. In such scenarios, it is convenient to be able to return
reactive types from the controller method.
Reactive return values are handled as follows:
-
A single-value promise is adapted to, similar to using
DeferredResult
. Examples includeMono
(Reactor) orSingle
(RxJava). -
A multi-value stream with a streaming media type (such as
application/x-ndjson
ortext/event-stream
) is adapted to, similar to usingResponseBodyEmitter
orSseEmitter
. Examples includeFlux
(Reactor) orObservable
(RxJava). Applications can also returnFlux<ServerSentEvent>
orObservable<ServerSentEvent>
. -
A multi-value stream with any other media type (such as
application/json
) is adapted to, similar to usingDeferredResult<List<?>>
.
Spring MVC supports Reactor and RxJava through the
ReactiveAdapterRegistry from
spring-core , which lets it adapt from multiple reactive libraries.
|
For streaming to the response, reactive back pressure is supported, but writes to the
response are still blocking and are run on a separate thread through the
configured
AsyncTaskExecutor
, to avoid blocking the upstream source such as a Flux
returned
from WebClient
.
Context Propagation
It is common to propagate context via java.lang.ThreadLocal
. This works transparently
for handling on the same thread, but requires additional work for asynchronous handling
across multiple threads. The Micrometer
Context Propagation
library simplifies context propagation across threads, and across context mechanisms such
as ThreadLocal
values,
Reactor context,
GraphQL Java context,
and others.
If Micrometer Context Propagation is present on the classpath, when a controller method
returns a reactive type such as Flux
or Mono
, all
ThreadLocal
values, for which there is a registered io.micrometer.ThreadLocalAccessor
,
are written to the Reactor Context
as key-value pairs, using the key assigned by the
ThreadLocalAccessor
.
For other asynchronous handling scenarios, you can use the Context Propagation library directly. For example:
// Capture ThreadLocal values from the main thread ...
ContextSnapshot snapshot = ContextSnapshot.captureAll();
// On a different thread: restore ThreadLocal values
try (ContextSnapshot.Scope scope = snapshot.setThreadLocals()) {
// ...
}
The following ThreadLocalAccessor
implementations are provided out of the box:
-
LocaleContextThreadLocalAccessor
— propagatesLocaleContext
viaLocaleContextHolder
-
RequestAttributesThreadLocalAccessor
— propagatesRequestAttributes
viaRequestContextHolder
The above are not registered automatically. You need to register them via ContextRegistry.getInstance()
on startup.
For more details, see the documentation of the Micrometer Context Propagation library.
Disconnects
The Servlet API does not provide any notification when a remote client goes away. Therefore, while streaming to the response, whether through SseEmitter or reactive types, it is important to send data periodically, since the write fails if the client has disconnected. The send could take the form of an empty (comment-only) SSE event or any other data that the other side would have to interpret as a heartbeat and ignore.
Alternatively, consider using web messaging solutions (such as STOMP over WebSocket or WebSocket with SockJS) that have a built-in heartbeat mechanism.
Configuration
The asynchronous request processing feature must be enabled at the Servlet container level. The MVC configuration also exposes several options for asynchronous requests.
Servlet Container
Filter and Servlet declarations have an asyncSupported
flag that needs to be set to true
to enable asynchronous request processing. In addition, Filter mappings should be
declared to handle the ASYNC
jakarta.servlet.DispatchType
.
In Java configuration, when you use AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer
to initialize the Servlet container, this is done automatically.
In web.xml
configuration, you can add <async-supported>true</async-supported>
to the
DispatcherServlet
and to Filter
declarations and add
<dispatcher>ASYNC</dispatcher>
to filter mappings.
Spring MVC
The MVC configuration exposes the following options for asynchronous request processing:
-
Java configuration: Use the
configureAsyncSupport
callback onWebMvcConfigurer
. -
XML namespace: Use the
<async-support>
element under<mvc:annotation-driven>
.
You can configure the following:
-
The default timeout value for async requests depends on the underlying Servlet container, unless it is set explicitly.
-
AsyncTaskExecutor
to use for blocking writes when streaming with Reactive Types and for executingCallable
instances returned from controller methods. The one used by default is not suitable for production under load. -
DeferredResultProcessingInterceptor
implementations andCallableProcessingInterceptor
implementations.
Note that you can also set the default timeout value on a DeferredResult
,
a ResponseBodyEmitter
, and an SseEmitter
. For a Callable
, you can use
WebAsyncTask
to provide a timeout value.