This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Boot 3.4.1! |
Generating Your Own Metadata by Using the Annotation Processor
You can easily generate your own configuration metadata file from items annotated with @ConfigurationProperties
by using the spring-boot-configuration-processor
jar.
The jar includes a Java annotation processor which is invoked as your project is compiled.
Configuring the Annotation Processor
When building with Maven, configure the compiler plugin (3.12.0 or later) to add spring-boot-configuration-processor
to the annotation processor paths:
<project>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<annotationProcessorPaths>
<path>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-configuration-processor</artifactId>
</path>
</annotationProcessorPaths>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
With Gradle, a dependency should be declared in the annotationProcessor
configuration, as shown in the following example:
dependencies {
annotationProcessor "org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-configuration-processor"
}
If you are using an additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json
file, the compileJava
task should be configured to depend on the processResources
task, as shown in the following example:
tasks.named('compileJava') {
inputs.files(tasks.named('processResources'))
}
This dependency ensures that the additional metadata is available when the annotation processor runs during compilation.
If you are using AspectJ in your project, you need to make sure that the annotation processor runs only once.
There are several ways to do this.
With Maven, you can configure the
|
If you are using Lombok in your project, you need to make sure that its annotation processor runs before |
Automatic Metadata Generation
The processor picks up both classes and methods that are annotated with @ConfigurationProperties
.
Custom annotations that are meta-annotated with @ConfigurationProperties are not supported.
|
If the class has a single parameterized constructor, one property is created per constructor parameter, unless the constructor is annotated with @Autowired
.
If the class has a constructor explicitly annotated with @ConstructorBinding
, one property is created per constructor parameter for that constructor.
Otherwise, properties are discovered through the presence of standard getters and setters with special handling for collection and map types (that is detected even if only a getter is present).
The annotation processor also supports the use of the @Data
, @Value
, @Getter
, and @Setter
lombok annotations.
Consider the following example:
import org.springframework.boot.context.properties.ConfigurationProperties;
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "my.server")
public class MyServerProperties {
/**
* Name of the server.
*/
private String name;
/**
* IP address to listen to.
*/
private String ip = "127.0.0.1";
/**
* Port to listener to.
*/
private int port = 9797;
// getters/setters ...
public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getIp() {
return this.ip;
}
public void setIp(String ip) {
this.ip = ip;
}
public int getPort() {
return this.port;
}
public void setPort(int port) {
this.port = port;
}
// fold:off
}
This exposes three properties where my.server.name
has no default and my.server.ip
and my.server.port
defaults to "127.0.0.1"
and 9797
respectively.
The Javadoc on fields is used to populate the description
attribute. For instance, the description of my.server.ip
is "IP address to listen to.".
You should only use plain text with @ConfigurationProperties field Javadoc, since they are not processed before being added to the JSON.
|
If you use @ConfigurationProperties
with record class then record components' descriptions should be provided via class-level Javadoc tag @param
(there are no explicit instance fields in record classes to put regular field-level Javadocs on).
The annotation processor applies a number of heuristics to extract the default value from the source model.
Default values have to be provided statically. In particular, do not refer to a constant defined in another class.
Also, the annotation processor cannot auto-detect default values for Collections
s.
For cases where the default value could not be detected, manual metadata should be provided. Consider the following example:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import org.springframework.boot.context.properties.ConfigurationProperties;
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "my.messaging")
public class MyMessagingProperties {
private List<String> addresses = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList("a", "b"));
private ContainerType containerType = ContainerType.SIMPLE;
// getters/setters ...
public List<String> getAddresses() {
return this.addresses;
}
public void setAddresses(List<String> addresses) {
this.addresses = addresses;
}
public ContainerType getContainerType() {
return this.containerType;
}
public void setContainerType(ContainerType containerType) {
this.containerType = containerType;
}
public enum ContainerType {
SIMPLE, DIRECT
}
}
In order to document default values for properties in the class above, you could add the following content to the manual metadata of the module:
{"properties": [
{
"name": "my.messaging.addresses",
"defaultValue": ["a", "b"]
},
{
"name": "my.messaging.container-type",
"defaultValue": "simple"
}
]}
Only the name of the property is required to document additional metadata for existing properties.
|
Nested Properties
The annotation processor automatically considers inner classes as nested properties.
Rather than documenting the ip
and port
at the root of the namespace, we could create a sub-namespace for it.
Consider the updated example:
import org.springframework.boot.context.properties.ConfigurationProperties;
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "my.server")
public class MyServerProperties {
private String name;
private Host host;
// getters/setters ...
public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public Host getHost() {
return this.host;
}
public void setHost(Host host) {
this.host = host;
}
public static class Host {
private String ip;
private int port;
// getters/setters ...
public String getIp() {
return this.ip;
}
public void setIp(String ip) {
this.ip = ip;
}
public int getPort() {
return this.port;
}
public void setPort(int port) {
this.port = port;
}
// @fold:off // getters/setters ...
}
}
The preceding example produces metadata information for my.server.name
, my.server.host.ip
, and my.server.host.port
properties.
You can use the @NestedConfigurationProperty
annotation on a field or a getter method to indicate that a regular (non-inner) class should be treated as if it were nested.
This has no effect on collections and maps, as those types are automatically identified, and a single metadata property is generated for each of them. |
Adding Additional Metadata
Spring Boot’s configuration file handling is quite flexible, and it is often the case that properties may exist that are not bound to a @ConfigurationProperties
bean.
You may also need to tune some attributes of an existing key.
To support such cases and let you provide custom "hints", the annotation processor automatically merges items from META-INF/additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json
into the main metadata file.
If you refer to a property that has been detected automatically, the description, default value, and deprecation information are overridden, if specified. If the manual property declaration is not identified in the current module, it is added as a new property.
The format of the additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json
file is exactly the same as the regular spring-configuration-metadata.json
.
The additional properties file is optional.
If you do not have any additional properties, do not add the file.